Channel
@Amongus_overheard
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
215subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003060918260 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Amongus_overheard |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Amongus_overheard |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 07:02 | 215 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 215 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 17 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (17 June 2026 – 1 August 2026) |
| Views total | 284 |
| Reactions total | 26 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 20:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
108 reactions across 8 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 43 | 39.8% | |
| 👍 | 14 | 13.0% | |
| 💔 | 14 | 13.0% | |
| 😨 | 9 | 8.33% | |
| custom 5436386324137393695 | 7 | 6.48% | |
| 🕊 | 7 | 6.48% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 3.70% | |
| 💋 | 4 | 3.70% | |
| 💘 | 2 | 1.85% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 1.85% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.926% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.926% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 108reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤩🤩𝘂𝗿𝗽𝗹𝗲🗝𝗶𝗻𝗸﹙𝐜𝐟 + 𝐝𝐚𝐢𝐥𝐲﹚🤩 🍓🔤𝗽𝗮вит𝗰я д𝘆𝗼 П𝗲рпл/Пинк из 𝗮ним𝗮ции 𝑹𝗼𝗱𝗮𝗺𝗿𝗶𝘅 ? 😳 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 🍓🗝𝗼ч𝗲шь вид𝗲ть б𝗼льш𝗲 к𝗼нт𝗲нта 𝗰 ними ? 🧪 😀😀🤩𝗛𝐀𝗕ИГ𝐀ЦИЯ🤩 𝗰𝗿 𝗮𝗿𝘁: @im_alice84 on X
Signed Рикоин
🥳🥳🥹🥹𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐢𝐬 𝐢𝐭? 🔪 𝖶𝖾𝗅𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾 𝗍𝗈.... 🥳🥹𝐖𝐇𝐈𝐓𝐄𝐑𝐄𝐃 𝐂𝐎𝐍𝐅𝐄𝐒𝐒𝐈𝐎𝐍🌟 🤩менно здесь ты найдёшь контент по этому милому пейрингу! ✍️ 🥳🥳🥳𝐻𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑦 𝑢𝑝 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑗𝑜𝑖𝑛 𝑢𝑠!💞
Signed Рикоин
[ 🧸 ] — Всем приветусики !! На связи владелец. Хочу вас всех поблагодарить за 200 подписчиков, я очень рад тому, что мы добились этой цифры, что-ж, а теперь бы мне хотелось отметить некоторые сто процентные будущие изменения в канале : ㅤ➖1⃣🔣Маскот в канале точно скоро будет. ㅤ➖2⃣🔣Будет переоформление под маскота, а так же возможные изменения [ к примеру новые правил, хештеги, оформление тейков и другое ] . ㅤ➖3⃣🔣 Буде…
❤7❤🔥2💘2🥰1
Signed ㅤ— ᴠᴇɴᴛʏ [ sʜᴇ/ᴀɴʏ ]
БОЖЕ МОЙ КАК ЖЕ МЕНЯ БЕСЯТ ФАНАТЫ РОДАМРИКС НЕТ Я НЕ ОБЯЗАН ШАРИТЬ ЗА ЭТО ГОВНО ТОЛЬКО ПОТОМУ ЧТО МНЕ ПОНРАВИЛСЯ ОФФИЦИАЛЬНЫЙ СЕРИАЛ КАКИЕ ГЕНИИ ПРИДУМАЛИ ЧТО Я В ФД АМОНГАСА ДОЛЖЕН ШАРИТЬ ЗА ВСЕ ЧТО ТАМ СДЕЛАНО БЫЛО ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ⮕ Анон || @Among_us_opinion_bot
❤6👍4❤🔥2🤔2
Signed ㅤ— ᴠᴇɴᴛʏ [ sʜᴇ/ᴀɴʏ ]
Почему люди не довольны возвращению инди космикьюб если лучшая возможность закупитьсч вещами которые не успел купить 👀👀 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ⮕ Анон || @Among_us_opinion_bot
👍10❤5custom 54363863241373936952
Signed ᅠ Рикоин 𝗕ׄ͜𝘂ׄ͜n𝗻ׄ͜y
ТВ/КВ: нецензурная лексика, нсфв, наркотики, курение, сх, кровь, яркие цвета, расчленёнка, цп 2 ЧАСТЬ ТЕЙКА ПРО ШЕЙПА 7. Противная манера речи, ужасное отношение к незнакомцам, знакомым, подписчикам и к другим. ( 1-2 картинки ) Вы могли это заметить, если состояли с ним в одном флуде/группе, а также если вы видели его тгк. 8. После того, как мы прекратили общение, он начал писать в моих любимых тгк/кф, "напоминая" о…
💔7😨5
Signed ᅠ Рикоин 𝗕ׄ͜𝘂ׄ͜n𝗻ׄ͜y
ТВ/КВ: нюдсы, износ, сх, пробив данных, суицид 1 ЧАСТЬ ТЕЙКА Доброго времени суток! Хотелось бы рассказать об одном человеке под ником "Шейп", та же "Ульяна Риска" Что же делала данная личность и какая она на самом деле? 1. Не умеет нести ответственность за свои отношения. ( 1-2 картинки ) Он клялся мне в любви и скидывал мне свои откровенные фотографии (причём ждал от меня таких же фоток), находясь в отношениях. А…
💔7😨4
Signed ᅠ Рикоин 𝗕ׄ͜𝘂ׄ͜n𝗻ׄ͜y
Мне очень нравится что в Шоу Голубая и Черная подружки прямо как в сериале Роды с Голубым и Чёрным. Четвером они такие милашки 🌟🌟🤣😔 . ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ⮕ Неанон: Спм || @Among_us_opinion_bot
❤8💋4custom 54363863241373936953👀1
Signed ᅠ Рикоин 𝗕ׄ͜𝘂ׄ͜n𝗻ׄ͜y
Я безумно счастлива от того факта, что после выхода нового офиц. сериала активность комьюнити заметно увеличилась и сама игра стала популярнее 🐾 Взять к примеру амонг конфешн, который за несколько дней набрал ±250 пдп сразу после выхода шоу. Да и сериал сам по себе замечательный, не жалею о том, что его посмотрела 🐾 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ⮕ Неанон: Рикоин || @Among_us_opinion_bot
❤17🕊2custom 54363863241373936952
Signed ᅠ Рикоин ᅠ ᓚᘏᗢᅠ
приветик,мне очень нравится хэдканон что Грей (из vs impostor) приёмный брат Чёрной из шоу по амонгасу ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ⮕ Анон || @Among_us_opinion_bot
🕊5
Signed ~ ᴠᴇɴᴛ [ sʜᴇ/ᴀɴʏ ] | #ɪsᴛᴘ
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @Amongus_overheard. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,057,875 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ᴀʍонᴦ ᴀᴄ ᴨодᴄᴧуɯᴀно 🍂” (@Amongus_overheard), 215 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Amongus_overheard.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.