4 measurements spanning 15 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 596–599 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
22 Aug 2026, 17:08
599
+2
14 Aug 2026, 18:18
597
+1
7 Aug 2026, 13:53
596
no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:32
596
first reading
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
26.8%
avg views ÷ 599 subscribers
Avg views / post
161
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.798%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 11 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
11 (4 August 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
1,768
Reactions total
11
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 05:32 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
11 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
6
54.5%
🔥
3
27.3%
👍
1
9.09%
😱
1
9.09%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
@Americastan2®
⚠️ Ўта муҳим
хатони тузатишга, иккинчи имконият бўлмаслиги мумкин
USCIS энди аризаларни қўшимча ҳужжат сўрамасдан ҳам рад этишга ҳақли
Агар ариза билан бирга мажбурий ҳужжатлар ёки исботловчи материаллар топширилмаган бўлса, энди USCIS (United States Citizenship and Immigration Services) дарҳол рад жавобини бериш ҳуқуқига эга. Яъни, сизга аввалгидай Request for Evidence (RFE, хатоларни тузатиш учун…
@Americastan2®
🇺🇿🇺🇸Текширамиз
АҚШга виза ҳолатини қандай текшириш мумкин?
Агар визага ариза топширган бўлсангиз, унинг ҳолатини бепул CEAC (Consular Electronic Application Center) орқали текширишингиз мумкин. Бу ерда ҳам иммиграцион, ҳам ноиммиграцион визаларнинг ҳолати кўринади
Нима қилиш керак:
▪️ CEAC сайтига киринг
▪️ Виза турини танланг:
• Immigrant Visa (IV)
• Nonimmigrant Visa (NIV)
▪️ Case Number ёки …
@Americastan2®
🇺🇸 Шошилманг
ота-онангизга грин-карта олиш учун фақат I-130 топшириш етарли эмас
Энг муҳим талаблардан бири - сиз уларга молиявий ҳомий бўлишингиз шарт
Нималарни билиш керак:
▪️ Ариза фақат 21 ёшдан ошган АҚШ фуқароси томонидан берилади
▪️ Сиз I-864 (Affidavit of Support) шаклини имзолайсиз ва ота-онангизни молиявий таъминлаш мажбуриятини оласиз
▪️ Қонун бўйича даромадингиз камида федерал камбағ…
@Americastan2®
Нега visa bond доимий бўлди
лойиҳа бир йил синов тариқасида ишлатилдиди:
▪️ Давлат тахминан 2 000 киши гаров тўлайди деб ўйлаган
▪️ Амалда эса гаров талаби қарийб 20 000 нафар аризачига қўлланилган
▪️ Уларнинг деярли ярми гаров тўлашдан бош тортган ва виза олмаган
▪️ Гаров туфайли ушбу давлатлар фуқароларига берилган B1/B2 визалари сони 83% га камайган
▪️ Гаров тўлаганлар ҳисобидан вақтинча $115…
@Americastan2®
Фуқаролик нима беради
кўпчилик фуқароликни фақат овоз бериш ҳуқуқи деб ўйлайди. Аслида афзалликлари анча кўп:
▪️ Грин-картани ҳар 10 йилда янгилашга ҳожат қолмайди
▪️ АҚШ паспортини олиш мумкин. У билан юздан зиёд давлатга визасиз ёки соддалаштирилган тартибда сафар қилиш мумкин
▪️ Узоқ вақт чет элда бўлиш грин-картага хавф туғдирмайди
▪️ Депортация хавфи йўқолади ва АҚШга қайтиш ҳуқуқи сақланади…
@Americastan2®
Фуқароликни олгандан сўнг
АҚШ фуқаролигини олдингизми? Бу ишларни орқага сурманг
Қасамёд маросимидан кейин ҳам бир нечта муҳим ишларни бажариш даркор:
▪️ АҚШ паспортига ариза беринг. Бу энди асосий ҳужжатингиз бўлади
▪️ Social Security Administration (SSA)даги маълумотларингизни янгиланг
▪️ Агар фарзандларингиз автоматик фуқаролик олган бўлса, улар учун ҳам фуқаролик ҳужжатларини расмийлаштиринг
…
@Americastan2®
Ҳаммасини ёзинг
N-400да қайси сафарлар, жарималар ва арестларни кўрсатиш керак
Фуқароликка топширганда АҚШдан ташқарига қилган сафарларингизни тўлиқ кўрсатиш керак. Одатда охирги 5 йилдаги, АҚШ фуқароси билан никоҳ орқали топширилса - охирги 3 йилдаги сафарлар сўралади
Паспорт, авиачипталар, банк картаси тарихи ва авиакомпания аккаунти орқали саналарни текшириб олинг. Айниқса, 6 ой ёки ундан кўп да…
@Americastan2®
N-400 чек-лист
Америка фуқаролигига топширишдан олдин нималарни тайёрлаш керак
N-400 аризасида ёзган ҳар бир муҳим маълумотингизни тасдиқлайдиган ҳужжатларни олдиндан йиғиб қўйинг:
▪️ грин-картанинг олд ва орқа томони нусхаси
▪️ охирги 5 йилдаги барча сафарлар, никоҳ орқали топширилса - охирги 3 йил
▪️ шу даврда яшаган барча манзиллар
▪️ ишлаган ва ўқиган жойлар
▪️ турмуш ўртоғи, собиқ турмуш ў…
@Americastan2®
$15 минг йўқ
🇵🇦 Бакс округининг (Bucks County) Уорминстер (Warminster) шаҳарчасида фирибгарлар ўғирланган банк карталари билан $15 минглик гўшт олиб кетишди
Уорминстер - 🔔 Филадельфияга жуда яқин жойлашган кичик шаҳарча. Бу ерда русийзабон аҳоли ҳам кўп
Altomonte's Italian Market & Deli дўконига телефон орқали катта буюртма тушган
Икки эркак қовурға гўшти ва мол думини фургонга ортиб кетган. Бири…
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @Americastan2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 88,573 of 1,584,733entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“@Americastan® - Bakhadyr Kudratov” (@Americastan2), 599 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Americastan2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.