Проверка связи
🔥1

Channel
@AmazingFuckingMarketing
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
16subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001372399833 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AmazingFuckingMarketing |
| Description | Покажи fuck своим конкурентам! 🤘🏻 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AmazingFuckingMarketing |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 16 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:23 | 16 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 April 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
19 reactions across 16 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 12 | 63.2% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 36.8% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 April 2022 to 3 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Проверка связи
🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
Что делать, если ты хочешь быстрых результатов, но боишься их? Да, как показывает практика, многие их боятся. Именно по этой причине, они хотят и не делают. Но тут скорее всего все зависит от суммы этих результатов. Сейчас поясню. Хотеть и сделать 50к за месяц или даже за неделю - это норм. Сумма не очень большая и тут как правило ступоров не возникает. Это может показаться нереальным только для того, кто только п…
👍1
Есть тут кто живой?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Хм... А я чёт и забыл совсем что тут у меня канал есть)))
👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
Хочешь больше денег? МЕНЯЙСЯ! Совершенно без разницы чем ты занимаешь и какая у тебя должность. Работаешь на фрилансе и продаешь свои или чужие услуги, делаешь что-то по ночам на кухне и продаешь, у тебя небольшой оффлайн магазин или огромный завод по производству чего либо. Если ты сейчас делаешь, то что делаешь и результаты, тебя не устраивают, то начни меняться. Вот смотри, например: Допустим ты хороший гонщик…
👍2
Есть тут кто живой?))
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
В школе такому не учат и в ВУЗах тоже. Сегодня провел обучающий вебинар для студентов, которые учатся на маркетологов в одном из Питерских вузов. За 1,5 часа показал им как создать чат-бота с нуля и запустить на него таргет для сбора заявок. Сильно перегружать не стал и усложнять бота тоже. Простенький квиз, в котором есть несколько ответвлений и по итогу готовая заявка, которая отправляется админу. По таргету п…
🔥1
Гоу сюда https://t.me/serzhiochannel
👍1
Трудности в бизнесе? Не майся! А к Сержу обращайся! Когда пишут цифры сколько лет в теме – это конечно хорошо, типа сразу виден опыт. Мегатонны отзывов тоже хорошо. Вот только не у всех и не всегда они могут пополнять. Ну если на постоянной основе ведешь 3 проекта больше года. Откуда брать эти самые отзывы?)) Приятно конечно, когда пишут и делятся результатами, но это редкое явление. Поэтому для меня крутой показ…
🔥1
Кайфомарафон. Начало. Я немного продлил запуск, чтобы у тебя была возможность успеть вписаться в этот движ! Если ты сомневаешься, подходит он тебе или нет, то ты всегда можешь написать в личку и спросить об этом. Навязывать я тебе ничего не буду. Вчера например хотели записаться, на Кайфомарафон, а по итогу записались на созвон, на котором решим, что делать дальше. Важную роль играют исходные данные! То в какой…
🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @AmazingFuckingMarketing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Есть тут кто живой?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Есть тут кто живой?))
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 April 2022 to 3 April 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AFM - AmazingFuckingMarketing” (@AmazingFuckingMarketing), 16 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AmazingFuckingMarketing.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.