https://www.youtube.com/live/LgiaEZbrs7M?si=bSnHe26Zj_q0W4E6

Channel
Medios Alternativos (canal)
@AlternativosCL
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,287subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001273411520 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AlternativosCL |
| Created | 18 July 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AlternativosCL |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 18:34 | 1,287 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:16 | 1,290 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:08 | 1,290 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 3 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 9.23%
- avg views ÷ 1,287 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 119
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (3 February 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 475 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 01:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
https://www.youtube.com/live/9AvkFcu2pu4?si=hm7ustAg_GsNnHiI
https://www.youtube.com/live/ZgfP420-sTM?si=BviUEYU-SlzmTKF3
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
🟢 Ya están publicadas las dos partes de este actualizado estudio denominado: "Dónde estamos y hacia dónde vamos: Acciones de Trump demuestran que está favoreciendo el cumplimiento de la profecía bíblica más rápido de lo que pensábamos." De antemano te invitamos a compartir esta información en tus redes, considerando que queda poco tiempo. La enorme mayoría de las personas ni siquiera se da cuenta que están dividie…
🟢 Se ha hecho viral que agentes gubernamentales norteamericanos se reunieron con pastores de modo que preparen a sus iglesias ante un supuesto contacto extraterrestre. Veamos que tan cierto es todo este alboroto que se ha viralizado en las redes. https://www.nuestraradio.org/analizando-que-hay-de-cierto-en-lo-que-respecta-a-la-revelacion-ovni/
✅ Johannes Kaiser desenmascara la agenda y las mentiras de la ministra de Desarrollo Social María Wulf —Y esta en lo cierto! Están trabajando para eliminar el anonimato en la red, introducir la identidad digital y perfeccionar el comercio de datos. Con esto avanzan en la creación de la infraestructura necesaria para construir una dictadura digital. Nos opondremos. Si quieren proteger a los niños se les impide el ac…
🚨 QUE NO TE ENGRUPAN: Lo que realmente están haciendo es trabajando para eliminar el anonimato en la red, e introducir la identidad digital. El objetivo es construir e instalar una DICTADURA DIGITAL. Si realmente les interesaran los niños, existen miles de formas de cuidarlos. Incluso bastaría con exigir a la plataformas verificar cuentas con menos de 10 años de apertura. Pero no... estos engendros te quieren "i…
👉🏼La Marca de la Bestia de Apocalipsis 13, tiene siete partes. Y en este estudio podrás entender claramente cuáles son. 👉🏼La tecnología que Apocalipsis describe, ya existe. En consecuencia, si quedase más tiempo, la misma tecnología superaría a lo que la Biblia revela. 👉🏼El tiempo que queda es muy breve. Te invitamos a compartir esta información. https://www.nuestraradio.org/escuchar-nuestraradio/
https://www.youtube.com/live/Uk26Tgk_tIg?si=pNPzjhZN_Wye6OVv
https://youtu.be/ELiy-mYXM8M?si=SWKd3VqO8z6dVfGJ
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @AlternativosCL. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 868,035 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Medios Alternativos (canal)” (@AlternativosCL), 1,287 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AlternativosCL.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.