Doge analysis Like 👍 Retweet 🔁 Follow ✅ 👇 https://x.com/i/status/2085030638042878384

Channel
Altcoins Guy
@AltcoinsGuySignals
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
572subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001316002536 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AltcoinsGuySignals |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AltcoinsGuySignals |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:35 | 572 | +3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:59 | 569 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:18 | 568 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 23.5%
- avg views ÷ 572 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 135
- 18 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 18
- of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (27 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,424 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 06:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
GM ☀️ Our Premium Group #AVAX trade is now up 13% 📈 If you're in the trade, this is a good time to consider taking profits and secure your gains. 𝗪𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗷𝗼𝗶𝗻 𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗣𝗿𝗲𝗺𝗶𝘂𝗺 𝗚𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗽 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗙𝗥𝗘𝗘? 🚀 Create your Bybit account using my link below and complete a $100 trade. Bybit: https://partner.bybit.com/b/158024 After completing your trade, send your Bybit UID to this bot: https://t.me/BybitExclusivebot Once verified, …
Should we BUY LIT again Full details Here 👇 https://x.com/i/status/2084136374207381807 Like 👍 comment Retweet 🔁
کل دو سگنل شیئر کیے تھے ایک فری آپ سب دوستو کے ساتھ LIT کا جس میں تقریباً ابھی تک 7 فیصد منافع ہے اور دوسرا AVAX کا پرائیویٹ گروپ میں شیئر کیا تھا جس میں 9 فیصد منافع ہے تو کس کس نے لیا تھا LIT اور AVAX باقی کسی دوست نے پرائیویٹ گروپ جوائن کرنا ہے وہ ڈیٹیل بھی موجود ہے Full details Here 👇 https://x.com/i/status/2083829428401148085
اِس وقت ہم LIT میں 7 فیصد منافع میں ہے چاہو تو منافع بک کرو چاہو تو SL اوپر لے جاؤ اور دونوں X اکاؤنٹ فالو کرو اگر آپ فری میں ہمارا پرائیویٹ گروپ جوائن کرنا چاہتے ہیں تو میرے Bybit لنک سے اکاؤنٹ بنائیں 👇اور 100 ڈالر کی ٹریڈ کریں Bybit: https://partner.bybit.com/b/158024 ٹریڈ کرنے کے بعد اس BOT کو اپنا BYBIT کا UID بھیجو https://t.me/BybitExclusivebot
If you see this post, please take a few minutes to read it carefully and share it with others. اِس پوسٹ کو پڑھو اور شیئر کرو لازمی یہ دوسروں کا آپ پر حق ہے 👇 https://x.com/i/status/2083767922011328603
https://x.com/i/status/2083745264075190321
#LIT update 👇 https://x.com/i/status/2083565678393741636 Like 👍 Retweet 🔁
From 0.220 to almost 0.30 Congrats to everyone Like 👍 Retweet 🔁 https://x.com/i/status/2083440915398492375
https://x.com/i/status/2082895079849779673
GRVT PRICE PREDICTION + GET 100 #FREE GRVT 👇 https://x.com/i/status/2082564233687130502 Like 👍 Retweet 🔁 Follow ✅GRVT
𝗙𝗿𝗼𝗺 $6 𝘁𝗼 $0.15… 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗵𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 $0𝗚? 🤔 0G Labs was one of the biggest AI + Crypto narratives, backed by massive funding. The project raised over $325M in committed funding, including a $35M pre-seed, $40M seed round, and a $250M token purchase commitment. Despite strong VC support and an AI-focused vision, $0G faced heavy selling pressure after reaching around $6 and is now trading near $0.15. A reminder for e…
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @AltcoinsGuySignals. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 97,215 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Altcoins Guy” (@AltcoinsGuySignals), 572 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AltcoinsGuySignals.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.