Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
32 measurements spanning 43 days, net -170. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,025–18,248 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 11:38
18,051
-10
16 Sept 2026, 02:19
18,061
-11
14 Sept 2026, 10:00
18,072
-15
12 Sept 2026, 22:41
18,087
-1
11 Sept 2026, 00:41
18,088
-26
7 Sept 2026, 23:35
18,114
-16
5 Sept 2026, 00:18
18,130
-12
3 Sept 2026, 06:08
18,142
-8
1 Sept 2026, 21:57
18,150
-3
31 Aug 2026, 23:48
18,153
-1
30 Aug 2026, 22:35
18,154
-4
30 Aug 2026, 00:43
18,158
-10
29 Aug 2026, 00:54
18,168
+1
27 Aug 2026, 00:43
18,167
+3
25 Aug 2026, 23:04
18,164
+1
25 Aug 2026, 01:29
18,163
-12
23 Aug 2026, 16:07
18,175
-10
22 Aug 2026, 04:16
18,185
-6
20 Aug 2026, 21:03
18,191
+4
19 Aug 2026, 21:15
18,187
first reading
Engagement
67 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.45%
avg views ÷ 18,051 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,170
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.34%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 67 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held
67 (29 July 2026 – 1 September 2026)
Views total
9,320
Reactions total
105
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 08:56 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 28s
Average length
2m 28s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,021 reactions across 51 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 92.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
948
92.9%
👍
50
4.90%
🔥
8
0.784%
😢
8
0.784%
💔
2
0.196%
🥰
2
0.196%
✍
1
0.098%
🍓
1
0.098%
💯
1
0.098%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 52 of the 67 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,021 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 67 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
قال رسول اللهﷺ:
" مَنْ جَاءَ مِنْكُمْ الجُمْعَةَ فَلْيَغْتَسِلْ "
قال الإمام الشافعي فكان قولُ رسول الله في
" غسل يوم الجمعة واجب " وأمْرُه بالغسل يحتمل معنيين الظاهرُ منهما أنه واجب فلا تجزئ الطهارَةُ لِصَلاة الجُمْعَةِ إلاَّ بالغسل كما لا يجزئ في طهارة الجُنُبِ غيْرُ الغسل ويحتمل واجبٌ في الاختيار والأخْلاق والنَّظافة .
الأم للشافعي
مناظرة بين الشافعي وأحمد ابن حنبل رضي الله عنهما
حكي أن أحمد ناظر الشافعي في تارك الصلاة فقال له الشافعي: يا أحمد أتقول إنه يكفر
قال: نعم
قال: إذا كان كافرا فبم يسلم
قال: يقول لا إله إلا الله محمد رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم
قال الشافعي: فالرجل مستديم لهذا القول لم يتركه
قال: يسلم بأن يصلي
قال: صلاة الكافر لا تصح ولا يحكم بالإسلام بها فإنقطع أحمد وسكت .
📜طبقات الشافعية الكبرى
قال الشافعي: قال الله تبارك وتعالى لنبيه ﷺ: {خذ من أموالهم صدقة تطهرهم}
والصلاة عليهم الدعاء لهم عند أخذ الصدقة منهم. و قال : فحق على الوالي إذا أخذ صدقة امرئ أن يدعو له، وأحب إلي أن يقول: "آجرك الله فيما أعطيت، وجعلها لك طهورا، وبارك لك فيما أبقيت"، وما دعا له به أجزأه إن شاء الله.
📜الأم للشافعي
قال الشافعي رحمه الله :
قال الله سبحانه لنبيه صلى الله عليه وسلم: {قُلْ مَا كُنْتُ بِدْعًا مِنَ الرُّسُلِ وَمَا أَدْرِي مَا يُفْعَلُ بِي وَلَا بِكُمْ } ثم أنزل الله عز وجل على نبيه، صلى الله عليه وسلم، أن غفر له ما تقدم من ذنبه وما تأخر - يعني قول الله عز وجل: {إِنَّا فَتَحْنَا لَكَ فَتْحًا مُبِينًا لِيَغْفِرَ لَكَ اللَّهُ مَا تَقَدَّمَ مِنْ ذَنْبِكَ وَمَا تَأَخَّرَ } يعني - والله أعلم - ما تقدم من ذنبه قبل الوحي، و…
🌸
قال الإمام الشافعي رحمه الله :
وَأُحِبُّ كَثرة الصلاة على النبي ﷺ في كل حال، وأَنا في يوم الجمعة وليلتها أَشَدّ استحبابًا.
📚 الأم
فالله الله عباد الله لا تملوا مِن الصلاة على النبي ﷺ زَين العباد الّذي خلّصنا به مِن حَرِّ جهنم وبِئسَ المِهَاد.
📚 ابن الجوزيّ | بستان الواعظين.
Showing the 12 most recent of 67 posts we hold for @Alshaf3ey. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
مَوَاعِظُ اِبْنِ الْجَوْزِيِّ @Ibn_Aljuzi · 37,633 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 31 August 2026
صحيح البُخاري ومُسلم @sahehlbokhari · 44,132 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 9 September 2026
الدُّرَرُ البَاهِرَاتُ @Drr_baherat · 43,576 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 28 August 2026
📚 أخلاق إسلامية 📚 @akhlakaslamea · 70,836 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 August 2026
التاريخ الإسلامي @alkelafa · 44,394 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 August 2026
أدهم شرقاوي @adhamsharkw · 94,355 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 August 2026
من أقوال أبن تيمية وأبن القيم @thamar4 · 57,876 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 23 August 2026
● قَنَاة | صَبُور الهَاشِمِيّ @PATIENT_77 · 22,104 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 21 September 2026
((صِبْغَةَ اللَّهِ ً )) @algwere · 42,080 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 August 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“الإمام الشافعي” (@Alshaf3ey), 18,051 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Alshaf3ey.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.