Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Alpha Transactions

Channel

Alpha Transactions

@AlphaTransactions

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

6subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001263722256
TypeChannel
Username@AlphaTransactions
Created7 August 2019measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/AlphaTransactions

Growth

66 August 2026 — 6 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 6 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5–7 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 19:336no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:056first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 7 August 2019the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 September 2019. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Links
16

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2019, 23:46 UTC138 viewsread 12 August 2026

💞 New Investment Alert 💞 💸 Amount: 0.01307973 LTC 👤 By User: Jonathan 🌐 Transection ID: 62496573c24c37e5507763392927c10234d5cbacc3bf82b158ed1d6c5131e753

22 Aug 2019, 15:30 UTC301 viewsread 12 August 2026

💞 New Investment Alert 💞 💸 Amount: 0.15910000 LTC 👤 By User: 🌐 Transection ID: 5a54132d02a3bd662e783346b2f892a8f3f8146be31fc09aecf86f275767da4c

22 Aug 2019, 12:27 UTC349 viewsread 12 August 2026

💳 New Withdrawal Alert 💳 💸 Amount: 0.01000000 LTC 👤 To User: Lucky 🌐 Transection ID: babe033c297011282bf38c05462d054fcf360a14b0f6d4a5192b9f3356a8815b

22 Aug 2019, 12:27 UTC260 viewsread 12 August 2026

💞 New Investment Alert 💞 💸 Amount: 0.10000000 LTC 👤 By User: HERNAN 🌐 Transection ID: 51b2dbf3a3a5006d0639641f49cd29fc9385872e16f3410b2d30e54c2d237e20

22 Aug 2019, 07:29 UTC205 viewsread 12 August 2026

💞 New Investment Alert 💞 💸 Amount: 0.01199636 LTC 👤 By User: Sf 🌐 Transection ID: 317644fc6597af583363c9d52d56f1a9fba920d5c005f68cb658b8aeb865506b

21 Aug 2019, 07:06 UTC297 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

which next bot currency should we launch?

  1. DOGE48%
  2. BTC52%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

20 Aug 2019, 20:32 UTC289 viewsread 12 August 2026

💳 New Withdrawal Alert 💳 💸 Amount: 0.00250000 LTC 👤 To User: LuckyBoy 🌐 Transection ID: 6b8da8dee1f051be2e8f3531f78bda29ef34a8566494aaaec82588d520468cfd

20 Aug 2019, 20:32 UTC269 viewsread 12 August 2026

💞 New Investment Alert 💞 💸 Amount: 0.02500000 LTC 👤 By User: jhony 🌐 Transection ID: 5f23f330abffc3ccc02ad88af46af12deb09ff23b1d5fc6770e5e53847336acd

20 Aug 2019, 17:10 UTC246 viewsread 12 August 2026

💞 New Investment Alert 💞 💸 Amount: 0.01635201 LTC 👤 By User: ???? 🌐 Transection ID: 648f004e9c54e2fb2ade541d5f46fde65116da85c8879ac2a79a141a8623d23c

20 Aug 2019, 14:54 UTC236 viewsread 12 August 2026

💳 New Withdrawal Alert 💳 💸 Amount: 0.00937677 LTC 👤 To User: Error Ni (Official 2) 🌐 Transection ID: a88bed7db730629a8352f13d6b8a022662aa73dd0a52cf4787d2c6f70a46a10a

20 Aug 2019, 14:54 UTC234 viewsread 12 August 2026

💞 New Investment Alert 💞 💸 Amount: 0.09376770 LTC 👤 By User: ??? ????? ?????? (Nisstobdho) 🌐 Transection ID: 0af171257dd850b1dd3d097016eb9d8ac2ebbaeb8e83c203fa79939e3d353615

20 Aug 2019, 14:06 UTC240 viewsread 12 August 2026

💳 New Withdrawal Alert 💳 💸 Amount: 0.00100000 LTC 👤 To User: LuckyBoy 🌐 Transection ID: 29650cf067e35f35b696d47335a164c935611db08bf1052be9816c61ccb2fecd

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @AlphaTransactions. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

21 Aug 2019, 07:06 UTCAnonymous Poll112 voters

which next bot currency should we launch?

  1. DOGE48%
  2. BTC52%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2019 to 2 September 2019. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,185,779 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Alpha Transactions” (@AlphaTransactions), 6 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AlphaTransactions.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.