Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ꞌꞋ𝐓𝐚𝐤.

Channel

ꞌꞋ𝐓𝐚𝐤.

@AloneAllTheTime

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

41subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 5 November 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001291548206
TypeChannel
Username@AloneAllTheTime
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded5 November 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/AloneAllTheTime

Growth

415 Nov 2026, 06:22 — 41 subscribers5 Nov 2026, 12:40 — 41 subscribers5 Nov 2026, 06:225 Nov 2026, 12:40
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40–42 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 12:4041no change
5 Nov 2026, 06:2241first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
83.6%
avg views ÷ 41 subscribers
Avg views / post
34.3
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held19 (1 August 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total377
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 06:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
19s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 19 we hold a reading for · 26%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @AloneAllTheTime. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 4 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 11 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 15:42 UTC15 viewsread 5 November 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed َ`𝖧𝖺𝖿𝗌𝖺

4 Nov 2026, 15:42 UTC137 viewsread 5 November 2026

ماری بهم یه روش درست کردن ویش‌لیست یاد داد و من فقط وقت کردم عکساشو درست کنمو چاپ کنم و دیگه هیچکاریشون نکردم جز گهگاهی عکسا رو واسه خودم نگاه کردم ، و الان دارم فکر میکنم همشون به نوعی تیک خوردن یا دارن تیک میخورن اونم زمانایی که بهشون فکر نکردم یا اصن فراموش کرده بودم و دنبالشون هم نبودم

Signed َ`𝖧𝖺𝖿𝗌𝖺

4 Nov 2026, 15:39 UTC15 views0 reactions2 Starsread 5 November 2026

امروزو هیچوقت فراموش نمیکنم ، یکی از خاص‌ترین روزای کل زندگیم بود :)

Signed َ`𝖧𝖺𝖿𝗌𝖺

4 Nov 2026, 15:39 UTC15 viewsread 5 November 2026

اینکه چک‌لیست امسالم یکی یکی داره تیک میخوره برام قشنگه بیشتر پی میبرم چقد فقط خودمو دارم فقط خودم تراپیست خودمم فقط خودمم که برای خودم موندم و دارم از پس خودم برمیام

Signed َ`𝖧𝖺𝖿𝗌𝖺

3 Nov 2026, 14:10 UTC22 viewsread 5 November 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed َ`𝖧𝖺𝖿𝗌𝖺

3 Nov 2026, 14:10 UTC23 viewsread 5 November 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

Signed َ`𝖧𝖺𝖿𝗌𝖺

2 Nov 2026, 12:16 UTC26 viewsread 5 November 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed َ`𝖧𝖺𝖿𝗌𝖺

2 Nov 2026, 12:16 UTC32 viewsread 5 November 2026

کاش کسی ازم درخواست نداشته باشه ، توقع نشده باشه ، انتظار نداشته باشه کاش همه فکر کنن من مردم و وجود خارجی ندارم

Signed َ`𝖧𝖺𝖿𝗌𝖺

30 Oct 2026, 20:20 UTC34 viewsread 5 November 2026
Photo

ChatGPT Opinion About Me : Top Line : Topic Title Bottom Line : Reason for Selection

Signed َ`𝖧𝖺𝖿𝗌𝖺

25 Oct 2026, 21:00 UTC43 viewsread 5 November 2026

از اینکه آدما فکر کنن با قشقرق به پا کردن میتونن به خواستشون برسن بدم میاد ، از اینکه فکر کنن 4تا جمله‌ی بی‌ربط که بار معنایی داره رو وسط یه بحث در قالب منطق بیارن و درکمال بی‌منطقی فکر کنن خیلی دارن منطقی صحبت میکنن بیشتر بدم میاد و از اینکه آدم بزرگا فکر کنن هرچی بلندتر حرف بزنن و چون بزرگترن جوابشونو نباید داد و جواب بدی داری توهین میکنی درصورتی که تو داری محترمانه حرفتو میزنی هم خیلی بیشتر بدم میاد

Signed َ`𝖧𝖺𝖿𝗌𝖺

5 Oct 2026, 21:43 UTC95 viewsread 5 November 2026

هردفعه این نتیجه رو میگیرم ولی باز کاری میکنن حرف بزنم و بعد بازم پشیمونم میکنن و اینجوری میشم که متظاهر رفتار کنم به نفعمه و این چرخه هی ادامه داره .. (میتونید به خودتون بگیرید حرفم مستثنی نداره)

Signed َ`𝖧𝖺𝖿𝗌𝖺

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @AloneAllTheTime. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ꞌꞋ𝐓𝐚𝐤.” (@AloneAllTheTime), 41 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AloneAllTheTime.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.