🛑 تکمیلی بعد ما میمانیم تسویه حساب با این صیغه زادگان. کاری با آنان خواهیم کرد که به جای گریه برای حسین، روزی هزاران بار به حال خوب بگریند.
💯18🔥2🍌1😁1

Channel
@Almoravide1044
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,001subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1004419345295 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Almoravide1044 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 1 August 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Almoravide1044 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 12:46 | 1,001 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 11:11 | 1,002 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 11:00 | 1,002 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (1 August 2026 – 1 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,318 |
| Reactions total | 128 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 11:11 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
128 reactions across 19 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 43 | 33.6% | |
| 🔥 | 26 | 20.3% | |
| 💯 | 25 | 19.5% | |
| 🤣 | 8 | 6.25% | |
| 🥰 | 8 | 6.25% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 3.91% | |
| 🤝 | 5 | 3.91% | |
| 🍌 | 2 | 1.56% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 1.56% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.781% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.781% | |
| 😎 | 1 | 0.781% | |
| 🥴 | 1 | 0.781% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 128reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🛑 تکمیلی بعد ما میمانیم تسویه حساب با این صیغه زادگان. کاری با آنان خواهیم کرد که به جای گریه برای حسین، روزی هزاران بار به حال خوب بگریند.
💯18🔥2🍌1😁1
🛑 روسیه گزارش شده است یک بمب در محل جشن تولد ژنرال الکساندر چایکو،فرمانده نیروی هوافضای ارتش روسیه منفجر شده است و چندین فرمانده نظامی روس کشته یا زخمی شدهاند!
🔥9
‼️هر داستانی سرانجام به فصل آخر خود میرسد و به نظر میرسد رژیم رافضی نیز به فصل پایانی خود نزدیک شده است. 📖⏳ بازوهای این رژیم به شرح زیر یا از بین رفتهاند یا در حال فروپاشی هستند: 📉🏚️ - حماس: نابودی کامل 💥 - حزبالله: در حال فروپاشی شدید 📉 - حوثیهای یمن: در حال فروپاشی شدید 📉 - بشار اسد: نابودی کامل 💥 - نیروهای نیابتی عراق: در حال فروپاشی شدید 📉 - رژیم رافضی: در حال فروپاشی 📉 ✅@akhbare_taze| اخبار تازه
💯3👍2
از فواید زیارت عرعربعین😂😂😂 یکی از اینها فقط زنده ماند که در کما است، براش دعا کنید.
😁6🤣3👍2
این چند زائر شیعه در مسیر کربلاء تصادف کردند و مردند، یک نفر از آنان به شدت مجروح است.
😁4🤣3👏1🥴1😍1
🛑 تکمیلی بزن دیگه لعنتی خسته مون کردی
😁7🍌1😍1😎1
اکسیوس: ترامپ در حال بررسی امکان صدور دستور فوری برای حمله به تاسیسات برق ایران است.
🔥4
🛑ایران در جریان عملیات نجات خلبانان آمریکایی، نیروهای رژیم ایران میخواستند با دوش پرتاب میثاق بالگرد بزنن اما همگی به درک واصل شدند. فقط در این منطقه ۱۲ نفر توسط پهپاد و جنگنده A10 به درک واصل شدند.
😁4🥰3
🛑فکت بسیاری از کانالهای اخوانی بعد از تسلیم شدن حماس، میگویند این گروهک به خاطر خیانت و انفعال امت شکست خورد و خلع سلاح شد!! والله تا آنجا که ما به خاطر داریم و در مرام نامه سیاسی حماس دیدیم، چیزی به اسم امت اسلام قید نشده است، حتی رهبران سیاسی این گروه از جمله ابوعبیده دجال، همیشه میگفتند (امت عربی) و (آزادگان عالم). البته ایران، قطر و ترکیه هم برای این گروه کم نگذاشتند و در ۱۹ سال گذشته، بالغ بر ۶۰ میلیارد دلا…
💯3
🛑عجیب جت آموزشی یاک ۱۳۰ ارتش ایران از فرودگاه مهرآباد بلند میشود تا پهپاد هرمس ۹۰۰ اسرائیلی را بزند، ولی از قضا یک فروند اف ۳۵ اسرائیلی آن را سرنگون میکند. خلبان اجکت میکند و در کوههای سمت لواسان فرود میآید. جالب اینجا است که جمهوری شیعه اصلاً نمیدانست که خلبان کجا سقوط کرد است. یکی از افراد محلی مکان سقوط خلبان را اطلاع داد😂 در مقابل، وقتی دو تن از خلبانان آمریکایی در ایران سقوط کرده بودند، سربازان آمریکایی …
😁3
🛑طنز عمو، دایی، عمه و خاله؛ حواستون باشه. مراقب بچههاتون باشید و دستش رو بگیرید که امشب بیرون نره. اگر اتفاقی افتاد یا بمباران هوایی شد و کسی آسیب دید، بعداً ناراحت نشید.
😁8
کاخ سفید: خداوند سربازان ما را حفظ کند. ✅@akhbare_taze| اخبار تازه
😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Almoravide1044. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,350,097 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“خبرگزاری المرابطون” (@Almoravide1044), 1,001 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Almoravide1044.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.