Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Рест|𝑩𝑳𝑶𝑶𝑫𝒀 ᴬᶫᶫᶦ 𝑹𝑶𝑼𝑭

@AllisonRoufep

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

103subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002518319930
TypeChannel
Username@AllisonRoufep
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/AllisonRoufep

Growth

10110310212 Aug 2026, 16:04 — 101 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 16:15 — 101 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 07:53 — 103 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 16:0413 Aug 2026, 07:53
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 101–103 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 07:53103+2
12 Aug 2026, 16:15101no change
12 Aug 2026, 16:04101first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 25 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
171.8%
avg views ÷ 103 subscribers
Avg views / post
177
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
18.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026
Posts held12 (25 June 202627 July 2026)
Views total885
Reactions total95
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

284 reactions across 6 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52175059602804832513713.0%
custom 54676636417864809753512.3%
custom 53346879710838531192910.2%
custom 5265139960796710340289.86%
custom 5289988751785755857207.04%
custom 5323631471133471371207.04%
custom 5260456818651469648196.69%
custom 5364290809833219859175.99%
custom 5260612923532812479165.63%
custom 5254005150707647837155.28%
custom 5292154484749806734155.28%
custom 5253458972601519171144.93%
custom 5400179084112190098103.52%
custom 526041074653728821793.17%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 284reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 12 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @AllisonRoufep. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 June 2026 to 27 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Jul 2026, 18:48 UTC154 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Думаю, пока посижу в ресте. Сейчас пропало какое-либо желание писать посты, и мне нужно просто немного отдохнуть от фандома. В данный момент нет желания продолжать сюжет или раскрывать персонажей, но я надеюсь, что оно вскоре вернётся. Это пока что не закрытие, но посмотрим как пойдёт Приват

custom 52921544847498067348

25 Jul 2026, 14:48 UTC159 views35 reactions11 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🤩 🤩🤩Охотник удалился, и 🤩🤩вновь пространство погрузилось в кромешную мрак. Это была огромная комната, лишенная окон и дверей, но ее просторы пестрели бесчисленными нишами, нагромождениями шкафов, стульев и столов, образуя лабиринт теней и потенциальных укрытий. Тишина здесь была не просто глубокой – она была осязаемой, плотной, словно можно было разрезать ее ножом. Это не та умиротворяющая тишина, что прино

custom 526045681865146964810custom 52899887517857558577custom 52604107465372882176custom 53642908098332198593custom 54676636417864809753custom 52540051507076478372custom 52606129235328124792custom 52921544847498067342

18 Jul 2026, 11:09 UTC207 views52 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🎤𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐂𝐈𝐓𝐘 𝐖𝐀𝐒 𝐁𝐔𝐒𝐓𝐋𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐖𝐈𝐓𝐇 𝐂𝐑𝐎𝐖𝐃𝐒 𝐎𝐅 𝐏𝐄𝐎𝐏𝐋𝐄, 𝐅𝐔𝐋𝐋 𝐎𝐅 𝐁𝐄𝐀𝐔𝐓𝐈𝐅𝐔𝐋 𝐂𝐎𝐒𝐓𝐔𝐌𝐄𝐒.. 🤩🤩🤩😈𝐈𝐟 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞𝐧'𝐭 𝐛𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐡𝐞 , 🤩🤩🤩😈𝐜𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢𝐯𝐚𝐥𝐥, 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞𝐧'𝐭 🤩🤩🤩😈𝐛𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐭𝐨 𝐁𝐫𝐚𝐳𝐢𝐥 😈😈😈 #𝐏𝐎𝐒𝐓 #𝐌𝐄𝐌𝐎𝐑𝐈𝐄𝐒

custom 526061292353281247914custom 528998875178575585713custom 52604568186514696489custom 52921544847498067345custom 52540051507076478374custom 53642908098332198594custom 52604107465372882173

9 Jul 2026, 11:23 UTC305 views66 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🎤𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐀𝐍𝐎𝐑𝐌𝐈𝐓 𝐓𝐀𝐊𝐄𝐒 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐖𝐇𝐎𝐋𝐄 𝐒𝐎𝐔𝐋 🌟🌟🌟😈𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐚𝐛𝐧𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐥 𝐭𝐚𝐤𝐞𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐰𝐡𝐨𝐥𝐞 🌟🌟🌟😈𝐥𝐞 𝐬𝐨𝐮𝐥, 𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞, 🌟🌟🌟😈𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲, 𝐦𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐬 😈😈😈😈 #𝐏𝐎𝐒𝐓 #𝐂𝐎𝐍𝐍𝐄𝐂𝐓 𝐈𝐯𝐚𝐧𝐨𝐯𝐚 𝐊𝐥𝐚𝐫𝐚 #𝐓𝐇𝐄𝐒𝐊𝐄𝐓𝐂𝐇

custom 526513996079671034016custom 546766364178648097516custom 521750596028048325114custom 54001790841121900988custom 53642908098332198594custom 52534589726015191713custom 53236314711334713713custom 52540051507076478372

1 Jul 2026, 14:21 UTC339 views49 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🎤𝐔𝐏 𝐔𝐏 𝐀𝐍𝐃 𝐎𝐍𝐋𝐘 𝐔𝐏. 𝐁𝐔𝐓 𝐖𝐇𝐀𝐓 𝐈𝐅 𝐈 𝐓𝐀𝐊𝐄 𝐀𝐍 𝐄𝐗𝐓𝐑𝐀 𝐒𝐓𝐄𝐏..? 🤩🤩🤩😈𝑴𝒐𝒖𝒏𝒕𝒂𝒊𝒏𝒔 𝒂𝒓𝒆 𝒂 𝒑𝒍𝒂𝒄𝒆 𝒘𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒆 🤩🤩🤩😈𝒕𝒊𝒎𝒆 𝒔𝒍𝒐𝒘𝒔 𝒅𝒐𝒘𝒏 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒏𝒂𝒕𝒖𝒓𝒆 🤩🤩🤩😈𝒓𝒆𝒊𝒈𝒏𝒔 𝒊𝒏 𝒂𝒍𝒍 𝒊𝒕𝒔 𝒈𝒍𝒐𝒓𝒚 🤩🤩🤩😈𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒈𝒓𝒂𝒏𝒅𝒆𝒖𝒓 😈😈😈😈😈 #𝐏𝐎𝐒𝐓 #𝐑𝐎𝐋𝐄𝐑𝐏𝐎𝐒𝐓

custom 533468797108385311913custom 546766364178648097511custom 52175059602804832518custom 52534589726015191715custom 52651399607967103405custom 52540051507076478372custom 53236314711334713712custom 54001790841121900982

27 Jun 2026, 11:16 UTC360 views74 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🎤𝐀𝐍𝐂𝐈𝐄𝐍𝐓 𝐆𝐑𝐄𝐄𝐊 𝐌𝐘𝐓𝐇𝐒 𝐀𝐑𝐄 𝐍𝐎𝐓 𝐃𝐀𝐍𝐆𝐄𝐑𝐎𝐔𝐒.. 𝐑𝐄𝐀𝐋𝐋𝐘? ⭐⭐⭐⭐😈𝑮𝒓𝒆𝒆𝒄𝒆 — 𝒅𝒂𝒛𝒛𝒍𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒍𝒊𝒈𝒉𝒕 🤩🤩🤩💀😈𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒂 𝒃𝒍𝒖𝒆 𝒔𝒆𝒂 𝒘𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒆 🤩🤩🤩🤩😈𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒊𝒔𝒍𝒂𝒏𝒅𝒔 𝒍𝒐𝒐𝒌 🤩🤩🤩🤩😈𝒍𝒊𝒌𝒆 𝒎𝒂𝒓𝒃𝒍𝒆. 😈😈😈😈😈 #𝐏𝐎𝐒𝐓 #𝐂𝐎𝐍𝐍𝐄𝐂𝐓 𝐌𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐁𝐮𝐥𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐝𝐞 #𝐓𝐇𝐄𝐒𝐊𝐄𝐓𝐂𝐇

custom 533468797108385311916custom 521750596028048325115custom 532363147113347137115custom 52651399607967103407custom 52534589726015191716custom 52540051507076478375custom 53642908098332198595custom 54676636417864809755

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @AllisonRoufep. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 485,238 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Рест|𝑩𝑳𝑶𝑶𝑫𝒀 ᴬᶫᶫᶦ 𝑹𝑶𝑼𝑭” (@AllisonRoufep), 103 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AllisonRoufep.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.