Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🇫🇷 —= L’ALLiAnce Strikes Back 17 =— 🇫🇷

Channel

🇫🇷 —= L’ALLiAnce Strikes Back 17 =— 🇫🇷

@Alliance_strike_back_17

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,826subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001524484561
TypeChannel
Username@Alliance_strike_back_17
Created21 August 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Alliance_strike_back_17

Growth

1,8211,8331,8277 August 2026 — 1,833 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,829 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,824 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,821 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,826 subscribers1,8267 August 202617 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 11 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,819–1,835 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 13:461,826+5
14 Aug 2026, 05:281,821-3
11 Aug 2026, 05:421,824-5
7 Aug 2026, 19:461,829-4
7 Aug 2026, 00:311,833first reading

Engagement

35 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.88%
avg views ÷ 1,826 subscribers
Avg views / post
70.9
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.46%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
35
of 35 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 20 of 27 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held35 (6 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total1,914
Reactions total58
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
12m 50s
Average length
4m 17s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

58 reactions across 20 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 12.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🖕712.1%
🙏712.1%
👏610.3%
👾58.62%
🌚46.90%
🎉46.90%
😎46.90%
❤‍🔥35.17%
💯35.17%
🕊35.17%
😱35.17%
🦄35.17%
23.45%
🤡23.45%
🤣11.72%
🤮11.72%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 58reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC11 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

🌎 — La Terre n’est ni plate ni parfaitement sphérique [00:00]. En raison de sa rotation sur elle-même, elle adopte une forme légèrement aplatie aux pôles et bombée à l’équateur [01:12]. ——— Professeur @FabrizioBucella Effet de la rotation et vitesse : Lorsqu’elle tourne, la vitesse de rotation est nettement plus élevée à l’équateur qu’aux pôles [00:13]. Principe d’inertie : En vertu de l’inertie (principe de Galil

Signed Mohamed ALI

7 Aug 2026, 16:39 UTC13 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎬 • Oui. Marjorie Prime (2017 • Michael Almereyda) • est particulièrement intéressant dans ton enchaînement, parce qu’il précède de plusieurs années les exemples réels que tu viens de donner. Le film sorti en 2017, imagine un futur proche où une technologie appelée « Prime » permet de recréer sous forme holographique des personnes disparues. Marjorie, âgée et atteinte de démence, converse ainsi avec une version jeun

👾2

Signed Mohamed ALI

7 Aug 2026, 16:35 UTC14 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🇪🇸 — L’artiste espagnole Alicia Framis a organisé le 9 novembre 2024, au Depot du Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen à Rotterdam, un mariage avec Ailex, un hologramme interactif alimenté par l’intelligence artificielle. Le musée présente l’événement comme la première fois qu’une femme épouse un hologramme d’IA. —— boijman. L’œuvre, intitulée « The Hybrid Couple », est une performance artistique qui explore la possibilit

🖕1

Signed Mohamed ALI

7 Aug 2026, 16:28 UTC16 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🇬🇧 — L’épisode raconte l’histoire de Pam Cronrath, qui, après la mort de son mari Bill, a fait créer une représentation holographique réaliste de lui, capable de parler et d’apparaître devant les invités. ——— BBC. Son objectif était de tenir une promesse faite à Bill : organiser un « super wake », une veillée funéraire hors du commun. Lors de la cérémonie, environ 200 personnes ont vu apparaître l’image de Bill, qu

🤡1

Signed Mohamed ALI

7 Aug 2026, 16:26 UTC17 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🇬🇧🇫🇷 — L’article de Mirror et Closer, publié le 4 décembre 2025, raconte l’histoire de Katrine Martinussen, dont le mari Stephan est mort d’un cancer le 30 décembre 2023. Avant sa mort, le couple avait décidé de créer une version numérique de Stephan à partir de milliers de SMS, photos, vidéos et messages audio. —— mirror. Une société danoise, Fraia, a développé une IA destinée à reproduire sa personnalité, sa mani

🤡1😎1

Signed Mohamed ALI

7 Aug 2026, 16:10 UTC15 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🇺🇸 — Le 6 août 2026, Donald Trump a signé deux décrets visant à limiter l’accès à la citoyenneté américaine de naissance et à lutter contre le « birth tourism » — le fait pour des étrangers de venir aux États-Unis principalement pour y faire naître un enfant qui obtient la citoyenneté américaine. ——— Reuters. Oui. Dans ton Prisme 17, le parallèle avec Project Orb se situe précisément là : « Es-tu un humain ? » La

👾1🖕1

Signed Mohamed ALI

7 Aug 2026, 15:51 UTC19 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🧿 — PRISME 17 — LE PEUPLE-ENFANT ET LA VERTICALITÉ Quand l’État doit entrer à l’aube dans une ferme avec les forces de l’ordre pour imposer une mesure sanitaire à un éleveur qui ne reconnaît plus spontanément la légitimité de la décision, le problème n’est plus uniquement sanitaire : il devient une question de confiance entre le peuple et l’institution. ——— La verticalité du système décide pour tous parce qu’elle

🖕1

Signed Mohamed ALI

7 Aug 2026, 14:56 UTC22 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🇫🇷🇺🇸🇷🇺 — Rencontres officielles entre les trois dirigeants — Emmanuel Macron, Donald Trump et Vladimir Poutine — il faut distinguer les rencontres bilatérales des rencontres à trois. ——— Rencontres Macron–Poutine 29 mai 2017 — Versailles : première rencontre Macron–Poutine, à l’occasion de la visite du président russe en France. 27 août 2019 — Fort de Brégançon : rencontre bilatérale consacrée notamment à l’Ukrain

🖕1

Signed Mohamed ALI

7 Aug 2026, 14:06 UTC21 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🇷🇺 • POUTINE — LA FOI ORTHODOXE • PRISME 17 🇷🇺 La foi orthodoxe de Vladimir Putin ne se lit pas uniquement comme une conviction religieuse personnelle : elle devient également un vecteur symbolique entre l’individu, la tradition et l’État. 1️⃣ La croix — le symbole intérieur La croix offerte par sa mère représente, dans cette lecture, une transmission personnelle : la mémoire familiale et la continuité spirituelle.

Signed Mohamed ALI

7 Aug 2026, 13:56 UTC19 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🧿 *- PRISME 17 — L’or réduit à son volume réel L’affirmation « tout l’or du monde tient dans un cube d’environ 22 m de côté » est une image particulièrement forte dans le Prisme 17. ——— invest. Si l’on considère l’or extrait mondialement comme une seule masse, sa densité extrêmement élevée fait disparaître l’illusion de son immense volume : 22 m × 22 m × 22 m ≈ 10 648 m³. Dans le langage du Prisme 17, le symbole

Signed Mohamed ALI

7 Aug 2026, 13:54 UTC18 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🇮🇳 INDE — OR, DÉMOGRAPHIE ET RÉALITÉ PHYSIQUE L’Inde est souvent présentée comme l’un des plus grands consommateurs d’or au monde, avec une demande fortement associée aux mariages, aux bijoux et aux fêtes religieuses. Mais derrière ces chiffres se trouve une question fondamentale : sur quelle démographie et sur quel nombre réel de mariages ces estimations reposent-elles ? Les chiffres démographiques de l’Inde sont

Signed Mohamed ALI

Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @Alliance_strike_back_17. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,231,844 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🇫🇷 —= L’ALLiAnce Strikes Back 17 =— 🇫🇷” (@Alliance_strike_back_17), 1,826 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Alliance_strike_back_17.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.