Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

“عَبدٌ في طَرِيقِ الاستِقامَة"

@All_TRUE_EXCEPT

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,240subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001718304979
TypeChannel
Username@All_TRUE_EXCEPT
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/All_TRUE_EXCEPT

Growth

1,2401,2411,240.511 Aug 2026, 16:46 — 1,241 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 10:33 — 1,240 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 16:4612 Aug 2026, 10:33
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,240–1,241 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 10:331,240-1
11 Aug 2026, 16:461,241first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.6%
avg views ÷ 1,240 subscribers
Avg views / post
181
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held20 (8 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total3,617
Reactions total428
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 16:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

428 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣20447.7%
13030.4%
🏆6415.0%
❤‍🔥153.50%
😭153.50%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 428reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 10:25 UTC123 views23 reactionsread 11 August 2026

دفعتنا من الرعب معش عرفو كيف يستروها معاه

🤣23

Signed Ali Alaroshey

11 Aug 2026, 10:25 UTC124 views24 reactionsread 11 August 2026

⁣💌 وصلتك رسالة جديدة ⏱ وقت الرسالة: 2026/08/11 - 01:23:05 PM ---- https://t.me/All_TRUE_EXCEPT/77609 ليا فترة نتابع في قنوات اشخاص من دفعتك وكنت بنعرف الدكتور ليش زعلان جيت اختصرتها ليا ف رسالة منووور🤣 ---- - تبرع لإستمرار عمل بوت صارحني 🎁

🤣24

Signed Ali Alaroshey

11 Aug 2026, 10:21 UTC126 views30 reactionsread 11 August 2026

كان زعلان منا عشان اجلنا الجزئي عدو الشباب عطوه درع حسيته اليوم كان طارب بعد ما كمل قال انا انقدر الهديه متاعتكم و فرحتني وعطانا درجات بلاش وجو في عقلي مغير تسلم ياجدي طلعنا من العيون وعيوني لكي غير خليك كويس معانا ارجوك

🤣30

Signed Ali Alaroshey

11 Aug 2026, 10:20 UTC126 views22 reactionsread 11 August 2026

اليوم الدكتور عطانا محاضره تقول ثُقب اسود وهوا من سلايد لسلايد وبعد قريب 3 ساعات قال حسني كثرت عليكم 😆 ومانضنيش نكملت اصلا

🤣22

Signed Ali Alaroshey

10 Aug 2026, 21:52 UTC139 views12 reactionsread 11 August 2026

سبحان الله وبحمده سبحان الله العظيم

9🏆3

Signed Ali Alaroshey

10 Aug 2026, 20:50 UTC155 views15 reactionsread 11 August 2026

قالوا يا رَسولَ اللَّهِ، أيُّ الإسْلَامِ أفْضَلُ؟ قالَ: مَن سَلِمَ المُسْلِمُونَ مِن لِسَانِهِ، ويَدِهِ. الراوي: أبو موسى الأشعري المحدث: البخاري المصدر: صحيح البخاري الصفحة أو الرقم: 11 خلاصة حكم المحدث: [صحيح]

12🏆3

Signed Ali Alaroshey

10 Aug 2026, 20:00 UTC167 views16 reactionsread 11 August 2026

قال الشيخ ابن عثيمين رحمه الله إذا أقسم عليك أخوك فإن من حقه عليك أن تبر بقسمه ولا تحنثه؛ لأنك إذا فعلت ذلك طمأنت نفسه، وهو في الغالب لم يحلف عليك إلا محبة لك؛ لأنه إما أن يحلف عليك ألا تفعل شيئا لأنه يضرك، أو أن يفعل شيئا لأنه ينفعك، فكان إبرار القسم أو المقسم من حقوق الإنسان على إخوانه. (التعليق على صحيح مسلم / ج10 / ص302).

14🏆2

Signed Ali Alaroshey

10 Aug 2026, 13:15 UTC205 views32 reactionsread 11 August 2026

مش عارف امتا نمسك روحي ومعش نحكي في قروب الدفعه خساره ما حاطه ارشيف

🤣29😭3

Signed Ali Alaroshey

9 Aug 2026, 22:33 UTC228 views25 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

تفاجأو بإختفاء قطعة ذهب… وفي النهاية لما فتشو كاميرات المراقبة طلع السبب فأرة "الفأرة تسرق" قال الشيخ ابن عثيمين: الفأرة تسرق الذهب، وهذا جربناه عندنا في البيت، فقد فقدنا خاتمًا من الخواتم للنساء، وبحثنا عنه، فإذا في الجدار شقّ، وكان عندي علم بأنها تسرق الذهب، فكبّرْنا الشق، ووجدنا الخاتم في هذا الشقّ . [شرح صحيح البخاري ٥/٧٦١]

18😭5🏆2

Signed Ali Alaroshey

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @All_TRUE_EXCEPT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,060,000 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

““عَبدٌ في طَرِيقِ الاستِقامَة"” (@All_TRUE_EXCEPT), 1,240 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/All_TRUE_EXCEPT.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.