Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for علی مسعودیان

Channel

علی مسعودیان

@Ali_Masoudian

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

463subscribers

+33 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004330375184
TypeChannel
Username@Ali_Masoudian
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 23 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Ali_Masoudian

Growth

430463446.57 August 2026 — 430 subscribers8 August 2026 — 430 subscribers16 August 2026 — 463 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +33. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 425–468 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 02:27463+33
8 Aug 2026, 05:18430no change
7 Aug 2026, 22:16430first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
124.6%
avg views ÷ 463 subscribers
Avg views / post
577
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.70%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (23 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total11,536
Reactions total178
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 05:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 31s
Average length
50s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

178 reactions across 19 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9955.6%
👍2815.7%
💋105.62%
👎95.06%
👏95.06%
😁73.93%
💔63.37%
🔥42.25%
🙏31.69%
👌21.12%
🖕10.562%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 178reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTC263 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

بررسی حقوقی دو توافق ١٩٢١ و ١٩۴٠ در مورد دریای کاسپین بسیاری از شایعات می‌گویند سهم ایران از دریای مازندران به موجب این دو توافق ۵٠ درصد بوده است. در تحلیلی در یوتیوب حدود ۴۵ دقیقه مفصل با استدلال و مبتنی بر مواد مربوطه این دو توافق به این شایعه ساده‌انگارانه و بسیار بی‌اساس پاسخ می‌گویم. به جای اینکه به‌دنبال این باشید که ببینید صفروف‌ها چه می‌گویند مبتنی بر سند صحبت کنید. آنچه الف و ب می‌گوید مهم نیست. آنچه توافق

💋3👏21👎1

6 Aug 2026, 09:56 UTC234 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

دروغی بزرگ برای خزر ناظر به توضیحات این ویدئو در هیچ قرارداد مکتوبی ذکر نشده حق ایران ۵٠ درصد بوده است. هیچ وقت. وقتی سندی برای ادعایی ندارید بهتر است آن ادعا را مطرح نکنید. اما قضیه به صورت دو فاکتو چطور بوده است؟ در زمان قدرت شوروی ما جرات نمی‌کردیم از خط آستارا حسینقلی خان که حدود ١٠ درصد از آب‌های خزر بود یک ذره آن طرف‌تر برویم. دقت کنید آن زمان جمهوری اسلامی از ١٩۶٢ تا ١٩٧٩ هنوز وجود نداشته است. یعنی در زمان پ

👍10💋2

5 Aug 2026, 21:35 UTC343 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

اینترنشنال شایعه‌پراکن در مورد خزر تازه دارم می‌فهمم ذهن یک سری عوام از کجا داره شستشو می‌شه. اینترنشنالی که امثال این ویسی احمق پشتش هستن، کاملاً داره نشون می‌ده که چگونه قصد داره از دریای خزر یک شایعه بسازه برای اینکه مردم رو با یک بهانه‌ی واهی دیگه به جون جمهوری اسلامی و به جون همدیگه بندازه. یکی نیست بگه وضعیت الان ایران از وضعیت زمان پهلوی در ارتباط با دریای خزر بهتره. چند ده کامنت دریافت کردم جمهوری اسلامی دار

8👏6💋1

3 Aug 2026, 19:13 UTC≈1,240 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

تحلیل حقوقی از سهم ایران از دریای خزر به موجب کنوانسیون آکتائو آیا با پیوستن ایران به کنوانسیون وضعیت حقوقی دریای خزر (کنوانسیون آکتائو)، سهم ایران از دریای خزر به ۹٪، ۱۳٪ یا ۲۰٪ کاهش پیدا می‌کند؟ این یکی از بحث‌برانگیزترین موضوعات حقوق بین‌الملل در ایران است؛ اما بسیاری از ادعاهای مطرح‌شده در فضای مجازی با متن خود کنوانسیون و قواعد حقوق بین‌الملل مطابقت ندارند. اینجا ببینید

👍5👎21👏1💋1

3 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC732 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

نوآوری در سؤال متون حقوقی از سال ١۴٠۴ سؤال «تشخیص لحن و تکنیک‌های بلاغی» تنها در کنکورهای ۱۴۰۴ و ۱۴۰۵ مطرح شده، اما همین مبحث در مجموع ۳ سؤال (۱۲٪ آزمون) را به خود اختصاص داده است. خبر خوب اینکه با یادگیری چند ترفند ساده و تکنیک‌های اختصاصی حل سؤال، می‌توانید این بخش را با اطمینان پاسخ دهید. 📖 توضیحات کامل را در وب‌سایت بخوانید.

5💋1

2 Aug 2026, 22:54 UTC303 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

تا به حال راجع به واژه Ethno-suprematism شنیده‌اید؟ اگر می‌خواهید دقیق معنای آن که برگردان فارسی‌اش «برترپنداری نژادی» است را درک کنید این ویدیو را ببینید.

6👎1💋1

1 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC269 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @moot_courtPhoto

راهنمای پیدا کردن کلیدواژه (Keyword) در متن حقوقی | آموزش تشخیص Keyword و عبور از دام‌های تست پیدا کردن کلیدواژه (Keyword) مهم‌ترین مهارتی است که می‌تواند سرعت و دقت شما را در پاسخ‌گویی به سؤالات متون حقوقی چند برابر کند. بسیاری از داوطلبان زمان زیادی را صرف خواندن کل متن می‌کنند، در حالی که افراد حرفه‌ای ابتدا کلیدواژه مناسب را پیدا می‌کنند و سپس مستقیماً به بخش مرتبط از متن می‌روند. اگر می‌خواهید در آزمون‌های حقوق

5

29 Jul 2026, 09:31 UTC509 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

تفسیر رایج از کلمه ترتیبات غلط است! دکتر غریب‌آبادی شب گذشته در رسانه ملی برخی استدلال‌ها را مطرح کردند که از منظر حقوق بین‌الملل و بحث تفسیر جای نقد دارد. ویدیو را کامل ببینید. مخصوصا در قسمت آخر نقد، تفسیر اشتباه رایج از کلمه «ترتیبات» توسط ایشان نیز مورد تاکید قرار می‌گیرد. ***یک سوال مهم*** حال بند ۵ چگونه باید تنظیم می‌شد که حرف ایشان و امثال ایشان درست از آب در می‌آمد تا جای تفسیر نباشد: - در آخر ویدئو توضیح

5

28 Jul 2026, 16:28 UTC428 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

بیچاره تنگه که از استدلال‌های شما به تنگ اومده: نقد من در یوتیوب.

😁7👌2👎1

28 Jul 2026, 10:31 UTC356 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @khabarfarda_irVideo

🔺 واکنش مسعودیان، کارشناس حقوق بین‌الملل به اظهارات خضریان: تحدید حدود فلات قاره چه ارتباطی به نظام عبور و مرور تنگه هرمز دارد؟! کسی که در این زمینه تخصصی ندارد، متنی را از روی برگه آن هم با اشتباه می‌خواند و چنین جواب پرتی به مسئله می‌دهد @khabarfarda_ir

👍6

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Ali_Masoudian. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 239,580 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“علی مسعودیان” (@Ali_Masoudian), 463 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ali_Masoudian.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.