https://x.com/AlghamdiProf/status/2116063769734349107

Channel
قناة حركة التاريخ
@Alghamddiprof2
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
11,517subscribers
+482 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001052789800 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Alghamddiprof2 |
| Description | للأستاذ :الدكتور / علي محمد عودة الغامدي |
| Created | Between 1 May 2016 and 28 February 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Alghamddiprof2 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Nov 2026, 14:18 | 11,517 | -6 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 04:18 | 11,523 | -4 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 22:54 | 11,527 | -1 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 18:38 | 11,528 | -1 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 19:30 | 11,529 | +2 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 22:27 | 11,527 | -3 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 00:05 | 11,530 | -5 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 00:30 | 11,535 | -2 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 21:49 | 11,537 | -7 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 00:36 | 11,544 | -1 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 01:41 | 11,545 | +1 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 01:29 | 11,544 | -3 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 00:47 | 11,547 | -1 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 23:40 | 11,548 | -6 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 23:48 | 11,554 | -2 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 21:09 | 11,556 | -2 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 18:47 | 11,558 | +9 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 22:10 | 11,549 | +3 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 22:11 | 11,546 | +15 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 16:57 | 11,531 | first reading |
Engagement
39 posts held, back to 26 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 63 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 14.8%
- avg views ÷ 11,517 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,710
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 39 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 39 (26 March 2026 – 30 October 2026) |
| Views total | 6,829 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Nov 2026, 22:06 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈112
- Videos
- ≈30
- Links
- ≈3,460
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 27s
- Average length
- 27s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 4 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
https://x.com/AlghamdiProf/status/2115882896724811869
فيديو من .
File, posted without a caption
9_ زكى الله ظواهر الصحابة وعلى رأسهم الخلفاء الراشدين الاربعة وأثنى الله عليهم وذكر بعض صفاتهم ، واغاظ بهم الكفار، قال تعالى: ﴿ مُحَمَّدٌ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ وَالَّذِينَ مَعَهُ أَشِدَّاءُ عَلَى الْكُفَّارِ رُحَمَاءُ بَيْنَهُمْ تَرَاهُمْ رُكَّعًا سُجَّدًا يَبْتَغُونَ فَضْلًا مِنَ اللَّهِ وَرِضْوَانًا سِيمَاهُمْ فِي وُجُوهِهِمْ مِنْ أَثَرِ السُّجُودِ ﴾ [الفتح: 29]. ولايُنكر أحدٌ أن الخلفاء الاربعة كانوا أقرب الصحابة مجل…
الصحابة في القرآن. من المسلم به عند أهل الاسلام المنزلة العالية للصحابة الكرام ، وإن من المسلم به عند أمة الإسلام قديماً وحديثاً إبتداءً بالصحابة الكرام وإنتهاءً بإخر مسلم أن أفضل هذه الامة وسادتها بعد رسول الله عليه الصلاة والسلام هم الخلفاء الراشدون الاربعة. ومعلومٌ كفر وزندقة من قال بغير ذلك ، وسنبين هنا من كتاب الله تعالى المنزلة العالية لهؤلاء الصحابة وعلى رأسهم الخلفاء الراشدين الاربعة ، وذلك كمايلي : 1 – ش…
بروتوكولات_آيات_قم_حول_الحرمين_المقدسين_ناصر_القفاري.pdf
https://x.com/AlghamdiProf/status/2108447588764594553
#شيعي_يتسنن_على_يد #يهودي_واليهودي_يعتنق #الاسلام_بسبب_ذلك !!!!!! قصة فيها عبرة لمن كان له قلب أو القى السمع وهو شهيد. روى اﺑﻦ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﻤﻘﺪسي ( توفي سنة : ٦٤٣ هجرية ). ﺃﻥ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺑﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﺤﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻗﺎﻝ : ﺧﺮﺟﺖ ﺃﻧﺎ ﻭﺟﻤﺎﻋﺔ ﻓﻨﺰﻟﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﻘﻴﺐ ( شيعي ) ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻳﻴﻦ ﻓﺄﻛﺮﻣﻨﺎ ﻭﺃﺣﺴﻦ ﻣﺜﻮﺍﻧﺎ ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻟﻪ ﺧﺎﺩﻡ ﻳﻬﻮﺩﻱ ، ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳﻒ ﺍﻟﻬﺎﺷﻤﻲ ﻟﻠﻨﻘﻴﺐ : ﺇﻥ ﺃﻣﻮﺭﻙ ﻛﻠﻬﺎ ﺣﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺟﻤﻌﺖ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻑ ﻭﺍﻟﻤﺮﻭﺀﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺮﻡ ، ﺇﻻ ﺃﻧﻨﺎ ﺃﻧﻜﺮﻧﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻣﻚ ﻟﻬﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻴﻬﻮﺩﻱ ﻣﻊ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺘﻪ …
#البذرة_الأولى_لنظرية_ولاية_الفقيه #التي_جاء_بها_الخميني_الهالك . البذرة الأولى لهذه النظرية أول من بذرها الفقيه الرافضي محمد بن مكي العاملي من جبل عامل في لبنان في عصر سلاطين المماليك ، حين زعم أن إمامهم الغائب ، المزعوم ، له نائب في الأرض. وقد حُوكِمَ على زندقته وتم إعدامه في دمشق سنة ٧٨٦ هجرية في عهد السلطان المملوكي برقوق. وهرب اتباعه إلى إيران ونشروا نظريته الباطلة ، ولما قامت الدولة الصفوية تبنت تلك النظرية.…
#الخلافات_بين_أهل_السنة #تستغلها_الباطنية_لنشر #دينها_الباطل. #مثال_من_التاريخ . من الحقائق المسلم بها ان العديد من الانتصارات التي حققها الاعداء على المسلمين عبر عصور التاريخ كانت بسبب المشاحنات والخلافات والمنازعات فيما بينهم وبين بعض. قال الله تعالى : ( ولاتنازعوا فتفشلوا وتذهب ريحكم ) . ومن أسف ان المسلمين لايتذكرون هذه السنة الربانية الا بعد فوات الأوان وبعد ان يجني عدوهم ثمار خلافاتهم ومنازعاتهم . واحيان…
#الكيسانية_وجبل_رضوى اعتقدت الكيسانية الذين يؤمنون بإمامة محمد بن الحنفية أن عودته ستكون من هذا الجبل لذلك قال شاعرهم ، وهو كثير عزة : ألا إن ألأئمة من قريش ولاة الحق أربعة سواء علي والثلاثة من بنيه هم الأسباط ليس بهم خفاء فسبط سبط إيمان وبر وسبط غيبته كربلاء وسبط لا يذوق الموت حتى يقود الخيل يتبعها اللواء تغيب لا يرى عنهم زمانا برضوى عنده عسل وماء وقد أخذت هذه الطائفة اسمها من كيسان مولى علي بن أبي طالب رضي الله عنه…
Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @Alghamddiprof2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Alghamddiprof2 edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 9 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 9 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@s_eulim · 96,043
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 August 2026
@kotobgycom · 18,944
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 3 October 2026
@fwayiid · 210,639
Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 16 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“قناة حركة التاريخ” (@Alghamddiprof2), 11,517 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Alghamddiprof2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.