Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Духи это текст

Channel

Духи это текст

@AlexeyFragRu

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,025subscribers

+9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001693258732
TypeChannel
Username@AlexeyFragRu
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/AlexeyFragRu

Growth

1,0161,0251,020.56 August 2026 — 1,016 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,016 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,017 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,024 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,025 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,015–1,026 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 05:251,025+1
12 Aug 2026, 18:331,024+7
9 Aug 2026, 12:371,017+1
6 Aug 2026, 13:061,016no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:191,016first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.6%
avg views ÷ 1,025 subscribers
Avg views / post
119
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held16 (5 August 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,908
Reactions total227
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 13:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

227 reactions across 16 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6026.4%
🖕4118.1%
🔥2812.3%
👏156.61%
💯146.17%
🤡114.85%
🤮93.96%
👍83.52%
😁83.52%
🤣83.52%
💩52.20%
🤔52.20%
🤨52.20%
😍20.881%
🥰20.881%
🦄20.881%
👀10.441%
😢10.441%
🤩10.441%
🤯10.441%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 227reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 11:51 UTC44 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Мое отношение к ремесленной парфюмерии Ремесленные парфюмеры —пионеры и первопроходцы, они как алхимики 16 века, смешивают в своих колбах разное, неприятно пахнущее, чтобы создать золото. Это меня восхищает. Смелость! Дерзость! Именно ремесленные парфюмеры не дают нам забыть как пахнет масло роз, жасмина, амбра и так далее, все эти живые мускусы и уды, и это очень здорово, иметь перед носом натуральные материалы д

3💯2🖕1😁1

6 Aug 2026, 11:09 UTC64 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

все мы ремесленные в чем-то #мемчик@AlexeyFragRu

🤣2🖕1😁1

6 Aug 2026, 11:08 UTC57 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

восхищаюсь ремесленными парфюмерами за смелость и любопытство здесь научился извлекать жидкое ароматическое масло из смол путём прессования кусочков смолы под огромным давлением и одновременным нагревом это же надо было додуматься. на видео извлечение масла из Мирра #материалы@AlexeyFragRu

2👍1🖕1🤔1

6 Aug 2026, 09:56 UTC77 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Как не сгинуть ремесленному парфюмеру Накипело по поводу ремесленных парфюмеров, которые поверили в себя и начали делать свой собственный саваж. Мне кажется, прошу прощения если ошибаюсь, но целью любого самостоятельного парфюмера является заработать много денег. А знаете что самое ценное, чем на самом деле обладает успешный ремесленный парфюмер? Что отличает от не такого успешного и вовсе неизвестного? Нет, не до

3💯2🤔2🖕1🤩1

6 Aug 2026, 08:06 UTC102 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Да ладно! Выпустили легенду Tobacco Franck Boclet (2014)🔥 — запах пачки сигарет, — в концентрации духи. Наверное, это кому-то нужно. #FranckBoclet@AlexeyFragRu #news@AlexeyFragRu

2👍2🔥1🖕1

6 Aug 2026, 04:20 UTC121 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Парфюмерное увлечение это весело Часто пишу об ужасах парфоголизма, но если не доводить до крайности, это же крутое и веселое увлечение. Сегодня улыбка не сходит с лица, неожиданно услышать во французских дорогих духах укроп. Конечно, никакого укропа там нет. Уже примерно понятно, это пачули и розы в такой акварельной концентрации создают неожиданную ассоциативную связь, и уже не развидеть! Примерно такое же сочет

6🤮3😁3🖕1

6 Aug 2026, 04:10 UTC112 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

По шкале всратости 7 из 10 #флакон@AlexeyFragRu

3🤡3👍2🖕2👀1💩1🤮1

6 Aug 2026, 03:22 UTC116 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Cuir A Corps Chambre52 (2025) — блюдо французской кухни Ну все. Блог надо в отпуск. Перенюхал. В духах с названием Кожа мне пахнет сушеным укропом. Здесь честный блог, а не пересказ пирамиды нот. Укроп так укроп. Что мне сделать? Очень приятный укроп! Сухой, высушенный на солнце и растолченный в труху. Которым пользуются всю зиму. Вот так. А вот если понюхать на руке, то скорее солнцезащитный крем. А вокруг укроп.

6👏4🖕4🤡1

5 Aug 2026, 19:06 UTC138 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Первые отзывы Areej Le Dore Nepalese Patchouli негативные. Вердикт — не носибельный. Жаль. Сам Уже Не Русский мужик Иван Инкин из Areej Le Doré (Russian Adam) пришел в комментарии объяснить происходящее: нужно дать отстояться. Ну да. Ну да. Будет возможность— проверим. #RussianAdam@AlexeyFragRu

🖕3🤔2😁2💩1🤡1🤮1

5 Aug 2026, 18:43 UTC148 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня какой-то день новостей. Balenciaga запускает три экстракта AMBER CRUSH, PINK OUD & VANILLA XXL. Мне понравилось, когда знакомился с основной коллекцией Дипломная работа Balenciaga. Итоги.🔥 Но почти ничего не носил потом, кроме Incense Perfumum Balenciaga (2025)🔥 — аромат душевного равновесия Так что посмотрим 👀 #Balenciaga@AlexeyFragRu #news@AlexeyFragRu

🔥4🖕42💩1🦄1

5 Aug 2026, 18:26 UTC152 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Clive Christian — бренд, который НЕ делал одеколон для сэра Уинстона Черчилля, выходит на рынок с масляными духами absolute oils в объеме 30 мл стоимостью от 700 тыс рублей (почти миллион за флакон) Слова излишни. #CliveChristian@AlexeyFragRu #news@AlexeyFragRu

🤨54🖕4💩1🤡1🤮1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @AlexeyFragRu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 348,512 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Духи это текст” (@AlexeyFragRu), 1,025 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AlexeyFragRu.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.