Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Alex Berenson

@Alex_Berenson

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

10,438subscribers

-52 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001535474820
TypeChannel
Username@Alex_Berenson
Created31 July 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Alex_Berenson

Growth

10,43810,49010,4647 August 2026 — 10,490 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,490 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,482 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,478 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,468 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,456 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,448 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,445 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,438 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -52. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,430–10,498 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 03:2610,438-7
12 Aug 2026, 19:0810,445-3
11 Aug 2026, 20:3110,448-8
10 Aug 2026, 21:4810,456-12
9 Aug 2026, 21:5710,468-10
8 Aug 2026, 20:2810,478-4
7 Aug 2026, 17:0510,482-8
7 Aug 2026, 01:0010,490no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:5710,490first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 December 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 January 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
12s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,106 reactions across 19 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍65959.6%
👏20918.9%
706.33%
🔥433.89%
🤬393.53%
🤔343.07%
🕊171.54%
😱70.633%
🤮70.633%
👎50.452%
🤣50.452%
😁40.362%
🤡40.362%
🥰20.181%
❤‍🔥10.09%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,106reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 December 2022 to 4 January 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Jan 2023, 01:41 UTC≈32,500 views226 reactionsread 13 August 2026

https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/on-damar-hamlin-mrna-shots-and-spin

👍14722🕊17🤔16🔥15👎5🤡4

7 Dec 2022, 12:52 UTC≈35,200 views362 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

After mass protests in China-including reports of a "Quarantine Site" being set ablaze in Lanzhaou. The Chinese Communist Party is ending their Zero Covid Policy. China, the origin of Covid-19, had been one of the last remaining hold-outs of school closures, digital tracking and other failed containment policies. With this change of course, Covid-19 lockdowns are being brushed to the dust bin of history. For th

👏200👍8143🔥16🤔11🤣5🤮3🥰2

5 Dec 2022, 20:38 UTC≈21,600 views96 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Just a few hours ago, Victoria, Australia, which comes closer than anywhere else in the world to counting actual deaths in real time, reported 3,736 deaths in November. That figure was only about 5 percent above the 2016-2021 average - well below monthly increases from earlier in the year. Last Thursday, a European consortium called EuroMOMO said its most recent weekly estimates “show elevated but decreasing level o

👍83🔥92🤔2

5 Dec 2022, 20:38 UTC≈11,600 views47 reactionsread 13 August 2026

mRNA Covid booster campaigns have flamed out. Will lower excess mortality follow? New datapoints suggest yes. A continuing trend will be VERY good news - and even harder for Covid vaccine advocates to explain. New evidence of a link between all-cause mortality and mRNA Covid vaccines is arriving - for an unexpectedly hopeful reason. After a short burst of booster shots earlier this fall, people in highly mRNA vacc

👍41🔥3🤔3

2 Dec 2022, 17:29 UTC≈12,200 views84 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Considering that Alameda hugely influenced the price of the FTT tokens, this would be a bit like Citibank simply declaring it had enough “Citidollars” in its accounts to pay off loans to other banks. The Coindesk.com report laid bare how much trouble FTX and Alameda were in, and a run on FTX began immediately as clients tried to pull their deposits. But they couldn’t, because FTX had transferred billions of dollars t

👍57🤬261

2 Dec 2022, 17:29 UTC≈9,000 views14 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

By the summer, Cohodes believed he had garnered enough evidence to interest mainstream media outlets. On July 3rd, he approached the cryptocurrencies team at Bloomberg, the financial news service. Bloomberg was not interested: I have a real problem with the mainstream media… I think this whole thing’s been covered up and I think they’ve failed people bad… Bloomberg said if we go to him with these questions, we’ll l

👍12👏2

2 Dec 2022, 17:29 UTC≈6,680 views17 reactionsread 13 August 2026

But Bankman-Fried wasn’t content to be known as a voice for fairness in cryptocurrency. He claimed to see himself as the 21st century’s savior, pretending that he only wanted to make money… to give it away. In interviews, he called himself a believer in “effective altruism,” a theory that basically claims that very smart people should try to get as rich as possible to become hyper-charitable. A doctor might save 100

👍17

2 Dec 2022, 17:29 UTC≈5,550 views13 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Yet at the same time, SBF pitched himself as the friend of small investors, a crypto executive who wanted to establish an exchange that would be fair for all. He regularly traveled to Washington to lobby regulators, and he donated more than $40 million to Democratic politicians in 2022 - and one point suggested he might donate as much as $1 billion to Democrats in 2024 race. (He has now claimed he secretly donated $

👍10🤮3

2 Dec 2022, 17:28 UTC≈5,200 views21 reactionsread 13 August 2026

It featured nearly a dozen people - including one who was supposed to be Brady’s plumber - doing little more than saying “I’m in” as Brady and Bundchen supposedly explained the wonders of cryptocurrency investing. In retrospect, the ad looks like nothing more than marketing for a Ponzi scheme on a massive scale. Cohodes: It was a giant Ponzi scheme to try to use customer money to control an agenda… Crypto was a hook

👍192

2 Dec 2022, 17:28 UTC≈4,850 views18 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

With fortunes apparently available for the taking, unsophisticated investors who had little understanding of crypto or its risks began to invest too. Crypto companies encouraged them, explicitly marketing leveraged currency trading - among the riskiest forms of speculation, essentially gambling on borrowed money - as an investment appropriate for average people. FTX was among the most aggressive advertisers, running

👍18

2 Dec 2022, 17:28 UTC≈4,720 views18 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Cohodes says Bankman-Fried’s behavior is particularly reprehensible because FTX targeted retail investors in the United States and around the world. In 2020 and 2021, as central banks pumped money into the financial system to cushion the effects of Covid lockdowns, the prices of financial assets like cryptocurrencies soared. Developers of and early investors in new cryptocurrencies could make fortunes overnight. Th

👍14😱3🤮1

2 Dec 2022, 17:27 UTC≈4,630 views22 reactionsread 13 August 2026

This defense would be more compelling if Bankman-Fried did not OWN 90 percent of Alameda - and if it had not lent him $1 billion, as the bankruptcy filing revealed. To Cohodes, Bankman-Fried is simply proving to the world what Cohodes has known all along. SBF is a sociopath and a compulsive liar. Throughout, italics are Cohodes’s own words: All these fraudsters that I’ve dealt with over the years, they all have th

👍16🤬5😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Alex_Berenson. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 906,587 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Alex Berenson (en.wikipedia.org)
“…[https://alexberenson.substack.com/ Alex Berenson] on [[Substack]] *[https://t.me/Alex_Berenson/ Telegram] {{Authority control}} {{DEFAULTSORT:Berenson, Alex}}…”
read 9 August 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Alex Berenson” (@Alex_Berenson), 10,438 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Alex_Berenson.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.