File, posted without a caption

Channel
A_H_M_1 | الف حاء میم
@AlefHaaMim
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,734subscribers
+172 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001388856349 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AlefHaaMim |
| Description | ✔ https://www.instagram.com/AlefHaaMim هر گونه دخل، تصرف یا استفاده تجاری ممنوع نشر آزاد ______________________________ ارسال پیام به صورت ناشناس از طریق لینک زیر: http://t.me/HidenChat_Bot?start=59795842 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AlefHaaMim |
Topic
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Nov 2026, 01:41 | 6,734 | +22 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 17:58 | 6,712 | +15 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 17:46 | 6,697 | +11 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 01:29 | 6,686 | -7 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 02:11 | 6,693 | -1 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 11:56 | 6,694 | +10 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 09:55 | 6,684 | +1 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 01:35 | 6,683 | +9 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 19:29 | 6,674 | +1 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 05:51 | 6,673 | +5 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 09:41 | 6,668 | +3 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 22:17 | 6,665 | -13 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 07:36 | 6,678 | +17 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 16:17 | 6,661 | +5 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 08:17 | 6,656 | +4 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 04:38 | 6,652 | +11 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 00:33 | 6,641 | +16 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:08 | 6,625 | +10 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:49 | 6,615 | +2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 18:54 | 6,613 | first reading |
Engagement
27 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 16.1%
- avg views ÷ 6,734 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,090
- 12 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 12
- of 27 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 27 (7 July 2026 – 13 November 2026) |
| Views total | 13,038 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Nov 2026, 11:07 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,750
- Videos
- ≈101
- Links
- ≈623
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 10m 08s
- Average length
- 2m 32s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 12 posts held from the last 30 days (41.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
با آنکه #حسین است پناه دو جهان او خود به پناهِ مادرش #فاطمه است #سیدرضا_موید #استوری @AlefHaaMim
مجموعه کامل فایل باکیفیت پ.ن: امتیاز تجاری اینکار انحصارا برای گروه "علیا" ست.
File, posted without a caption
وارث حیدر خیبرشکنیم نوبت ماست در از جا بکنیم #حیدر_مددی Instagram | @AlefHaaMim
امیرالمومنین (ع) این روزها با دل شکسته، با سینهی پر از غم، با عزیزهی خود وداع میکند و ودیعهی گران بهای پیغمبر (ص) را به او برمیگرداند؛ دل امیرالمومنین(ع) پر از غم است اما ارادهی او و همت او مطلقا کاستی نگرفته است؛ این درس است برای من و شما. #مقام_معظم_رهبری ت: ۵ , ۱۲ , ۱۳۹۴ 📖 از کتاب : #حقیقت_عظیم #استوری @AlefHaaMim
بدون پس زمینه
#تایپوگرافی_خام وکتور
سایز #دسکتاپ [افقی]
سایز #استوری
File, posted without a caption
شعار مشترک هیأتها در #فاطمیه ۱۴۰۵ «با بیرق خونخواهی ما لشکر زهراییم» 🚩 @AlefHaaMim
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @AlefHaaMim. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@tasviredel · 20,696
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 September 2026
@imamalinetfa · 39,188
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 30 August 2026
@roholamin_atelie · 34,177
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 3 September 2026
@AliFaniOfficial · 24,774
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 17 September 2026
@storymazhabi_313 · 27,744
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 September 2026
@khattmedia · 21,317
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 24 September 2026
@Sajedifr · 55,685
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 24 August 2026
@SedEhsanArt · 19,690
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 29 September 2026
@soleimany_ir · 37,704
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 31 August 2026
@typokar · 26,631
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 September 2026
@razavi_aqr_ir · 51,863
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 25 August 2026
@PNAH_HARM · 24,308
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 16 September 2026
@Tarahan_Home · 37,924
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 31 August 2026
@hoseintaheri_telegram · 110,253
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 17 August 2026
@nooriehinfo · 43,424
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 August 2026
@HaithamYssef · 19,893
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 28 September 2026
@novagraphi · 21,704
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 22 September 2026
@al_mayameen14 · 21,340
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 23 September 2026
@abaratinfo · 60,498
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 August 2026
@fotros_ir · 68,667
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 20 August 2026
@AhleBeytMedia · 62,882
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 August 2026
@QafArt · 20,687
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 21 September 2026
@sedkhareji · 21,601
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 22 September 2026
@unihoosh · 26,706
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 September 2026
This channel appears in 28 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“A_H_M_1 | الف حاء میم” (@AlefHaaMim), 6,734 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AlefHaaMim.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.