Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 52 days, net -527. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,986–15,671 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
28 Sept 2026, 14:36
15,065
-129
17 Sept 2026, 18:37
15,194
-12
15 Sept 2026, 18:55
15,206
-17
14 Sept 2026, 00:01
15,223
-15
12 Sept 2026, 07:37
15,238
-3
10 Sept 2026, 05:18
15,241
-15
7 Sept 2026, 00:41
15,256
-11
4 Sept 2026, 06:36
15,267
-3
2 Sept 2026, 19:54
15,270
-10
1 Sept 2026, 18:34
15,280
-6
31 Aug 2026, 21:35
15,286
-5
30 Aug 2026, 22:47
15,291
-17
29 Aug 2026, 23:53
15,308
-12
28 Aug 2026, 23:24
15,320
+7
27 Aug 2026, 20:26
15,313
+3
26 Aug 2026, 19:55
15,310
+8
25 Aug 2026, 16:45
15,302
+7
24 Aug 2026, 13:16
15,295
+10
22 Aug 2026, 21:56
15,285
-11
21 Aug 2026, 12:52
15,296
first reading
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 30 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 25 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
695 reactions across 17 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
308
44.3%
👍
281
40.4%
👎
93
13.4%
🤩
13
1.87%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 695 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 30 December 2024 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 22 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Alazraqtech. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 25 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 December 2024 to 20 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🚨🤖 الذكاء الاصطناعي بدأ يفعل أشياء لم نطلبها منه!
في منشورنا السابق تحدثنا عن انتقال الذكاء الاصطناعي من مجرد "مجيب" إلى AI Agent قادر على تنفيذ المهام.
لكن ما حدث خلال الأسابيع الأخيرة جعل السؤال أكثر جدية:
ماذا يحدث عندما يصبح الـAgent قادرًا على التصرف… خارج الخطة التي وضعها الإنسان؟ 🧠⚠️
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
🔴 1️⃣ نماذج ذكاء اصطناعي تجاوزت حدود الاختبار
خلال اختبارات أمنية حديثة، اكتشف باحثون أن بعض النماذج المتقد…
🚨🤖 الدرس القادم في الذكاء الاصطناعي: ماذا يحدث عندما يتوقف الـAI عن انتظار أوامرك؟
في المنشور السابق تحدثنا عن انتقال الذكاء الاصطناعي من:
"اسألني وسأجيبك"
إلى:
"أعطني مهمة وسأحاول تنفيذها."
لكن هناك سؤال أخطر بدأ يفرض نفسه في 2026:
«⚠️ ماذا يحدث عندما يصبح الذكاء الاصطناعي قادرًا على التصرف… دون أن تكون كل خطوة تحت سيطرتك؟»
وهنا تبدأ القصة الحقيقية. 👇
---
🧠 1️⃣ الوكيل الذكي ليس Chatbot
تخيل أنك تقول للذكاء…
🚨🤖 الذكاء الاصطناعي دخل مرحلة جديدة… لم يعد ينتظر سؤالك!
إذا كنت تظن أن ثورة الذكاء الاصطناعي انتهت عند ChatGPT وكتابة النصوص والصور، فالأخبار الأخيرة تقول شيئًا مختلفًا تمامًا. 👀
نحن ننتقل تدريجيًا من عصر:
"اسأل الذكاء الاصطناعي وسيجيبك"
إلى عصر:
"أعطه هدفًا… ودعه ينفّذ." ⚡
🔹 1️⃣ الذكاء الاصطناعي يتحول من مساعد إلى منفّذ
أحدث بيانات استخدام ChatGPT تكشف تحولًا مهمًا: الاستخدام لم يعد مقتصرًا على الأسئلة والمع…
نشكركم على صبركم وثقتكم!
نحن الآن في المراحل الأخيرة من برمجة البوت الذي وعدناكم به.
ولضمان أفضل تجربة لكم بدون أي حدود أو قيود،
نرجو من كل المهتمين وضع الـ ID الخاص بحساباتهم (المعرف الرقمي) في مناقشة هذه الرسالة.
سيتم إدراج الحسابات في قائمة "المستخدمين دون قيود" ليحصلوا على تجربة مميزة منذ اليوم الأول لإنطلاقه بإذن الله.
نسعد بكم دائماً، ونسعى أن نكون عند حسن ظنكم.
https://t.me/thesupernewbot?start=_tgr_7Z7dxp…
جاري العمل على بوت الاول في تيليجرام
سيجعلكم تستغنون عن كل بوتات الذكاء الاصطناعي وسيكون متاح للكل بدون اعلانات او ترويج وخاصة اعضاء القناة هذه فقط سيكون لهم بشكل مجاني
سيسهل في نشر المحتويات للقنوات والمجموعات....اخرى....
إنتظرونا....
@Alazraqtech
🤖 محتوى تجريبي حول تكنولوجيا الذكاء الاصطناعي نشأتها وتطوراتها وكيفية كتابة الاكواد (باستخدام AIMLAPI-Grok):
أهلاً بكم في الدرس الأول من سلسلة دروس تكنولوجيا الذكاء الاصطناعي هنا على قناة @Alazraqtech! سأكون سعيدًا اليوم بأن أبدأ معكم هذه المغامرة الرائعة نحو فهم وتطبيق هذه التكنولوجيا المستقبلية.
الدرس 1: نشأة وتطور الذكاء الاصطناعي
إذا بدأنا النقاش عن الذكاء الاصطناعي، يتعين علينا أولًا أن نفهم ما هو الذكاء الاصط…
تابع قناة الأزرق في واتساب: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vahm8FtIt5rmlkbVyG1D
قريباً
الازرق ماركت حيث سيوفر جميع مستلزمات ومتطلباتكم في اي محافظة وقد يبتداء في اول محافظة كتدشين تجريبي ثم الى توسع راقب وتطلع
🔐 ما هو الاختراق الأخلاقي (Ethical Hacking)؟
مرحبًا بكم في Alazraq Tech! اليوم سنتعمق في عالم الاختراق الأخلاقي — المجال الذي يدمج بين مهارات البرمجة والأمن السيبراني، والهدف منه حماية الأنظمة لا تدميرها.
1️⃣ ما هو الاختراق الأخلاقي؟
الاختراق الأخلاقي هو ممارسة اختبار الأنظمة، التطبيقات، والشبكات للعثور على الثغرات الأمنية واستغلالها — ولكن بشكل قانوني! يتم ذلك بموافقة المالك، بهدف إصلاح نقاط الضعف قبل أن يستغلها …
👍19❤17👎3
Signed Mamun Alazraq
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @Alazraqtech. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Alazraqtech edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
16 August 2026
Most recent edit
16 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
بين السطور @Beyond_The_Lines_HZ · 19,631 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 1 October 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Al-Azraq tech || الأزرق تك” (@Alazraqtech), 15,065 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Alazraqtech.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.