Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for TIC_IIS201_BAIT_IIS202 - اختبار

Channel

TIC_IIS201_BAIT_IIS202 - اختبار

@Akram_IIS201_IIS202

Not marked by Telegram, checked 25 September 2026

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,396subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 24 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002220403083
TypeChannel
Username@Akram_IIS201_IIS202
Descriptionقناة خاصة بمادة TIC_IIS201 BAIT_IIS202 اختبارات واسئلة شاملة ومقسمة حسب كل شابتر بالإضافة لأسئلة الدورات واسئلة مشابهة للنموذج الامتحاني لأي استفسار: https://t.me/AkraM_Tello
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded24 September 2026
Last confirmed live24 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Akram_IIS201_IIS202

Growth

1,39624 Sept 2026, 22:47 — 1,396 subscribers24 Sept 2026, 23:22 — 1,396 subscribers24 Sept 2026, 22:4724 Sept 2026, 23:22
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,395–1,397 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Sept 2026, 23:221,396no change
24 Sept 2026, 22:471,396first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 24 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
19
Links
6

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

216 reactions across 15 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤16275.0%
👍146.48%
🔥136.02%
😎104.63%
🥰62.78%
👨‍💻31.39%
😍31.39%
🤨20.926%
⚡10.463%
👏10.463%
😁10.463%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 216 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 December 2025 to 2 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Jul 2026, 15:58 UTCviews —

TIC_IIS201_BAIT_IIS202 - اختبار pinned «طمنونا يلي قدم اليوووم 🤍»

2 Jul 2026, 15:58 UTC609 views16 reactionsread 24 September 2026

طمنونا يلي قدم اليوووم 🤍

❤13🔥2⚡1

Signed AkraM Tello

23 Jun 2026, 07:12 UTCviews —

TIC_IIS201_BAIT_IIS202 - اختبار pinned «طمنونا كيف قدمتوو ؟»

23 Jun 2026, 07:12 UTC≈1,430 views22 reactionsread 24 September 2026

طمنونا كيف قدمتوو ؟

🔥11❤7👍4

Signed AkraM Tello

9 Jun 2026, 14:05 UTCviews —

TIC_IIS201_BAIT_IIS202 - اختبار pinned «لكل حدا عم يلاقي صعوبة أو عم يتخربط بفهم الأشكال النظامية (Normal Forms) بقواعد البيانات.. عملتلكم هالفيديو، شرحت فيه الموضوع بطريقة كتير مبسطة وعملية لحتى توصل الفكرة وتثبت 100% وبدون تعقيد. 💡 شوفوا الشرح من هون، وإن شاء الله حتلاقوا الموضوع صار أسهل بكتير:…»

9 Jun 2026, 14:00 UTC≈2,210 views19 reactionsread 24 September 2026

لكل حدا عم يلاقي صعوبة أو عم يتخربط بفهم الأشكال النظامية (Normal Forms) بقواعد البيانات.. عملتلكم هالفيديو، شرحت فيه الموضوع بطريقة كتير مبسطة وعملية لحتى توصل الفكرة وتثبت 100% وبدون تعقيد. 💡 شوفوا الشرح من هون، وإن شاء الله حتلاقوا الموضوع صار أسهل بكتير: https://youtu.be/IzZ1352bRCY

❤19

Signed AkraM Tello

17 Apr 2026, 16:26 UTCviews —

TIC_IIS201_BAIT_IIS202 - اختبار pinned «كورس مادة " تصميم وبنيان قواعد المعطيات" (TIC_IIS201_BAIT_IIS202) 💻 ​الكورس كامل وشامل لكل أفكار المقرر، باستثناء الشابتر 3 ، والشابترات 11،12 هدول كانو محذوفين الفصل الماضي. ​📺 رابط الكورس على يوتيوب: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLjs5yziDJQoEbq80…»

17 Apr 2026, 16:26 UTC≈2,850 views12 reactionsread 24 September 2026

كورس مادة " تصميم وبنيان قواعد المعطيات" (TIC_IIS201_BAIT_IIS202) 💻 ​الكورس كامل وشامل لكل أفكار المقرر، باستثناء الشابتر 3 ، والشابترات 11،12 هدول كانو محذوفين الفصل الماضي. ​📺 رابط الكورس على يوتيوب: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLjs5yziDJQoEbq80BpLcEiPLY8YprTZWO&si=9W0cWMKPGR64OmOi ​📁 رابط ملفات المادة: https://t.me/Akram_IIS201_IIS202/732 ​بالتوفيق.

❤12

Signed AkraM Tello

17 Apr 2026, 13:28 UTC≈2,940 views15 reactionsread 24 September 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

❤15

Signed AkraM Tello

24 Dec 2025, 09:34 UTC≈3,290 views29 reactionsread 24 September 2026

طمنونااا يلي قدم 🤍

❤24😍3👍2

Signed AkraM Tello

24 Dec 2025, 08:17 UTC≈3,210 views41 reactionsread 24 September 2026

done ✅ بالتوفيييق🤍

❤36👨‍💻3👏1😁1

Signed AkraM Tello

24 Dec 2025, 08:03 UTC≈3,170 views17 reactionsread 24 September 2026

السبب ببساطة: بنص المسألة قايلينلكن بالحرف: "الموظف بيقدر يعمل أكتر من مقابلة بنفس اليوم". يعني تخيل الموظف (Emp_num) بنفس التاريخ (I_date)، ممكن يكون عندو اجتماع الساعة 9 الصبح بغرفة P70، وبعدين عندو اجتماع تاني الساعة 11 بغرفة تانية P60. معناها إذا عرفنا بس (رقم الموظف + التاريخ)، هاد الشي مو كافي لنعرف هو "بأيا غرفة" قاعد بالضبط، لأنو الزلمة ممكن يكون بأكتر من غرفة بنفس النهار. لتزبط هي التبعية، كان لازم يضيفوا…

❤13👍4

Signed AkraM Tello

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Akram_IIS201_IIS202. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

24 Dec 2025, 08:03 UTCAnonymous Quiz544 voters

أي من التبعيات الوظيفية التالية تعتبر "خاطئة" (غير محققة) في هذا الجدول؟

  1. C_id + I_date → I_time, Room_num, Emp_num18%
  2. I_date + I_time + Emp_num → C_id18%
  3. I_date + I_time + Room_num → C_id, Emp_num20%
  4. I_date + Emp_num → Room_num44%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Dec 2025, 07:57 UTCAnonymous Quiz534 voters

أي من التالي يشكل المشكلة المرتبطة بتكرار البيانات؟

  1. تتطلب البيانات المتكررة مساحة تخزين أكبر.55%
  2. يجب أن تعكس التطبيقات البرمجية بنية البيانات المتكررة.7%
  3. الحاجة لكتابة برامج تقوم بتحويل البيانات إلى صيغة معروفة.13%
  4. تؤدي البيانات المتكررة إلى جعل الاستعلامات أقل مرونة.25%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Dec 2025, 07:57 UTCAnonymous Quiz550 voters

عند تحويل المخطط المفاهيمي إلى منطقي، فإن الواصفة المشتقة تترجم إلى حقل (عمود) مستقل في الجدول."

  1. صح72%
  2. خطأ28%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Dec 2025, 07:54 UTCAnonymous Quiz584 voters

من أشكال العلاقات (Cardinality) كل مما يأتي ما عدا:

  1. عديد لعديد4%
  2. واحد لعديد4%
  3. صفر لصفر89%
  4. واحد لواحد3%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Dec 2025, 07:53 UTCAnonymous Quiz554 voters

يجب تحديد سياسات العمل من قبل المصممين لتحديد أثرها على طبيعة ودور ومدى عمل البيانات فيها

  1. صح81%
  2. خطأ19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Dec 2025, 07:50 UTCAnonymous Quiz574 voters

تتكون مرحلة تصميم قاعدة المعطيات من ثلاث مراحل أساسية، أي من الخيارات التالية ليس منها؟

  1. التصميم المفاهيمي11%
  2. التصميم المنطقي6%
  3. التصميم الفيزيائي15%
  4. التصميم الهرمي68%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 December 2025 to 2 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

الجامعة الافتراضية السورية
@svuonlineTic · 21,091
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 24 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“TIC_IIS201_BAIT_IIS202 - اختبار” (@Akram_IIS201_IIS202), 1,396 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Akram_IIS201_IIS202.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.