Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Ахмад Анчихский

@AkhmadAnchikh

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,645subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001343419616
TypeChannel
Username@AkhmadAnchikh
Created27 March 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/AkhmadAnchikh

Growth

3,6443,6493,646.57 August 2026 — 3,649 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,648 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,644 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,645 subscribers3,6457 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,643–3,650 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 14:563,645+1
11 Aug 2026, 02:523,644-4
8 Aug 2026, 01:413,648-1
7 Aug 2026, 09:473,649first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 7 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.8%
avg views ÷ 3,645 subscribers
Avg views / post
613
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.36%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held22 (7 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total9,808
Reactions total229
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 22:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 20s
Average length
1m 07s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

354 reactions across 21 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍27477.4%
custom 52335824094164485518022.6%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 354reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 20:27 UTC102 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Ali_Karimov85Photo

Консалтинг-центр «Правильный бизнес» объявляет о проведении онлайн курса «Исламские финансы». Данный курс представляет собой базовый уровень в области торговых отношений, который даст бизнесменам фундаментальные основы, регулирующие коммерческую деятельность. ТЕМЫ КУРСА Вступление Договор купли-продажи Принятие товара во владение Продажа с задатком Отказ от договора: во время заключения сделки во время, у

7 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC268 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

«Если бы Аллах не ниспослал нам Коран, то вся наша жизнь превратилась бы в неправду». /Акыль аш Шамри/

👍10

7 Aug 2026, 01:43 UTC323 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ShamsMedia1File

Делитесь пожалуйста книгой. Скоро будет конкурс будем разыгрывать часы.

👍6

5 Aug 2026, 19:30 UTC408 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @urokiotRasula

«Когда в общество мусульман и призывающих к Исламу заходят люди, зараженные тщеславием, злословием, эгоизмом, самообольщенностью и другими порочными качествами – они так же заражают общину подозрительностью, злословием, тайными беседами и разногласиями, которые приводят к формированиям мелких групп, что негативно сказывается как на некоторых членах группы, так и на всей исламской общине в целом» – Имам Расул Гамзато

👍8custom 52335824094164485513

5 Aug 2026, 06:51 UTC464 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026

«Воистину, постоянное поминание Аллаха на дорогах, в домах, в селах, в городах, в пути, увеличивает свидетелей в судный день. Земли, территории, горы, будут свидетельствовать за поминающих в судный день». /Ибн аль Кайим/

👍28custom 52335824094164485511

4 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC498 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

«Витр - сунна муаккада (усиленная) по согласию мусульман. От того, кто постоянствовал в ее оставлении не принимается свидетельство». /Ибн Таймийя/

👍14

4 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTC514 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

«Тот, кто подсчитывает беды забывая о милостях своего Господа». /Хасан аль Басри/

👍17

4 Aug 2026, 06:18 UTC523 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

«Грех на сердце подобен маслу на одежде, если его не смыть (вовремя), оно расширяется». /Ибн аль Джаузи/

👍14

2 Aug 2026, 01:16 UTC614 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

«Если человек не стремится излечить болезнь своего сердца, то он будет наказан усилением этой болезни». /Шейх ибн Усаймин/

👍15custom 52335824094164485514

31 Jul 2026, 19:31 UTC736 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Из проявления хорошего отношение к жене - прежде всего ее воспитание и привитие ей нужных качеств с тем, чтобы она впоследствии привила их детям. Глупо и опрометчиво приводить хадис о хорошем отношении к женам лишь в контексте дарения им подарков и их ублажения. Аллах спросит с мужей за воспитание жен прежде, чем спросит их за переданные им блага и подарки. Он спросит женщин за воспитание детей не меньше, чем спросит

custom 523358240941644855116

31 Jul 2026, 16:01 UTC611 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Ambodik3_ru

«Отвращение обвинений в неверии (такфире) от мусульманских учёных, даже если они допустили ошибку, является одной из важнейших целей Шариата.» 💭 Шейхуль-Ислам Ибн Теймия

👍10

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @AkhmadAnchikh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,102,571 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ахмад Анчихский” (@AkhmadAnchikh), 3,645 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AkhmadAnchikh.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.