4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,370–3,399 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 20:15
3,373
-11
11 Aug 2026, 00:51
3,384
-12
8 Aug 2026, 00:25
3,396
no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:46
3,396
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.38%
avg views ÷ 3,373 subscribers
Avg views / post
80.4
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
18 (21 July 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
1,448
Reactions total
192
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 23:24 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 50s
Average length
55s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
192 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5219692184533502413
58
30.2%
custom 5364109867156001787
55
28.6%
❤
28
14.6%
🔥
26
13.5%
🐳
11
5.73%
🌚
6
3.13%
👍
4
2.08%
🤣
3
1.56%
❤🔥
1
0.521%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 192reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
32
across the posts below
Posts paid on
18
of 18 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @AirdropCryptoHouse. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Дуров + Маск = Глобальный альянс? Почему основателю Telegram нужна «крыша» Илона
Пока Павел Дуров находится под беспрецедентным давлением сразу нескольких сверхдержав, в кулуарах всё громче обсуждают его возможное сближение с медиаимперией Илона Маска.
Почему это происходит именно сейчас?
Кольцо вокруг Telegram сжимается. К началу августа 2026 года ситуация выглядит критической:
✅ Россия: ФСБ официально предъявила …
Крупнейший банк Испании заходит в Биткоин
Banco Santander — гигант еврозоны с активами более €1.8 трлн — официально раскрыл свои позиции в криптовалюте. Согласно свежему отчету SEC, банк владеет акциями спотовых биткоин-ETF (IBIT) на сумму $4.3 млн. Это первый подобный шаг в истории консервативного испанского гиганта.
Почему это важно?
1. Институциональное признание: Когда банк такого уровня включает BTC в свой бал…
От «Нового Баффетта» до Маржин-колла за 24 часа: История Леопольда Ашенбреннера
Еще вчера Леопольд Ашенбреннер считался главным вундеркиндом в мире AI. В 19 лет — диплом Columbia, работа в OpenAI, легендарное эссе о приходе AGI и запуск фонда Situational Awareness LP.
Его стратегия казалась гениальной: он ставил не на хайповые чат-боты, а на «жесткую» инфраструктуру — энергию и дата-центры.
Цифры поражали воображ…
Америка пылесосит рынок: корпорации скупили почти все BTC!
Цифры шокируют: компании из США сейчас удерживают 1,24 млн BTC. Это 93% от всех корпоративных запасов мира.
Главный триггер:
За прошлый год они купили 510 000 монет. Это в 3 раза больше, чем все майнеры мира успели добыть за этот же период. Предложение на рынке буквально испаряется.
Что дальше?
Майнеры всё чаще переключают свои мощности с добычи крипты на …
Трейдеры массово мигрируют на DEX
Пока многие спали, в DeFi произошел исторический сдвиг. Резюмируем факты:
✅ DEX доминируют: Объем торгов ончейн-перпами (децентрализованными фьючерсами) пробил $15 трлн. При этом объем спотовых торгов на централизованных площадках рухнул на 74% за год.
✅ Hyperliquid — новый Nasdaq: Площадка забирает ~32% рынка DEX-перпов. По данным ARK Invest, мы вошли в новую эру: на HL RWA-акти…
Поиграл в Steam — остался без сид-фразы
ФБР накрыло 21-летнего хакера, который превратил Steam в охотничьи угодья. Схема была гениально простой: парень заливал фейковые игры, в которые был вшит дрейнер.
За два года «успешного успеха» он успел:
✅ Заразить ~8 000 ПК.
✅ Вскрыть 80 криптокошельков.
✅ Вынести как минимум $220 000.
На чем погорел? На любви к фастфуду. Хакер менял украденную крипту на подарочные карты U…
Конец эпохи «Наемного Труда»: Успеете ли вы запрыгнуть в последний вагон?
Многие воспринимают цитаты Илона Маска как научную фантастику, но реальность жестче: он не просто предсказывает будущее, он его навязывает.
Суть предупреждения проста: окно возможностей закрывается. У нас есть окно в 3 года, чтобы перестать быть «продавцами времени» и стать «владельцами ресурсов».
Почему старые правила больше не работают?
За…
Майкл Сейлор:
"Работать упорно — худший совет, который вы можете получить.
ИИ будет работать больше вас.
Роботы будут работать больше вас.
Ваши навыки обесцениваются.
Ваш труд теряет ценность каждый день.
Люди, которые продолжают продавать своё время, будут бороться.
Люди, которые владеют редкими активами, победят.
Именно поэтому я полностью в Биткоине.
Вы всегда можете напечатать больше денег.
Вы всегда можете пос…
GRAM и экосистема TON игнорируют новости об обвинениях Павлу Дурову
Рынок демонстрирует удивительную стойкость: курс токена GRAM практически не изменился после новостей о предъявлении Павлу Дурову обвинений в содействии терроризму и возможном объявлении в международный розыск.
Главное из динамики:
• GRAM: В моменте цена просела на 2%, но восстановилась буквально за считанные минуты.
• Мемкоины TON: Проекты с объемо…
Заголовок: ФСБ объявила Павла Дурова в международный розыск
Основателю Telegram предъявлено официальное обвинение в содействии террористической деятельности (ч. 1.1 ст. 205.1 УК РФ).
Главное из заявления ведомства:
✅ Причина: Отказ администрации мессенджера удалять каналы и боты, используемые для координации терактов, диверсий и кибермошенничества.
✅ Кейс «Дайвинчика»: Следствие утверждает, что через популярный сер…
Крипто-кладбище 2026: рынок очищается от «пустышек»
Пока мы ждем разворота тренда, индустрия проходит через жесткую фазу естественного отбора. Если 2022 год запомнился крахом гигантов (FTX, Terra), то 2026-й стал годом «тихой смерти» сотен проектов, которые не вывезли проверку реальностью.
Что говорят цифры?
По данным RootData и CryptoRank, с начала года уже более 99 проектов официально прекратили работу. В списке…
🇷🇺 Россия легализует крипту: эпоха «серого» рынка подходит к концу
21 июля 2026 года Госдума приняла в финальном чтении исторический закон, который превращает криптовалюту из «непонятного актива» в полноценный объект гражданских прав. Закон вступает в силу с 1 сентября 2026 года, а полноценная инфраструктура заработает к лету 2027-го.
Что это значит для обычного пользователя?
✅ Легальный статус: Криптовалюта офици…
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @AirdropCryptoHouse. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 241,672 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CryptoHouse” (@AirdropCryptoHouse), 3,373 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AirdropCryptoHouse.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.