Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 39 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,367–2,374 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 10:39
2,372
+1
12 Sept 2026, 03:20
2,371
+1
7 Sept 2026, 09:36
2,370
+2
30 Aug 2026, 08:57
2,368
-3
14 Aug 2026, 20:45
2,371
-2
11 Aug 2026, 07:11
2,373
+2
7 Aug 2026, 16:02
2,371
no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:51
2,371
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 4 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
31m 51s
Average length
3m 32s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
461 reactions across 17 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
194
42.1%
👍
105
22.8%
🔥
75
16.3%
❤🔥
19
4.12%
🤣
19
4.12%
⚡
14
3.04%
👏
7
1.52%
😁
6
1.30%
🥰
6
1.30%
🤝
4
0.868%
💯
3
0.651%
custom 5429607289491303127
2
0.434%
🙏
2
0.434%
🤩
2
0.434%
🆒
1
0.217%
💘
1
0.217%
🦄
1
0.217%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 461 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 4 February 2026 to 10 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Учебный год завершен. Позади государственные экзамены, впереди — новый этап. Выпускники ординатуры кафедры анестезиологии и реаниматологии ИНОПР РНИМУ им. Н.И. Пирогова, обучавшиеся на базе ММКЦ «Коммунарка», продолжат свой профессиональный путь в нашем центре уже в качестве врачей.
Они рассказали, почему выбрали одну из самых сложных медицинских специальностей и чему научились.
🚑 Один день в роли… стажёра реанимационной службы
В нашем проекте дети уже примеряли на себя разные профессии. В этот раз Глебу выпала возможность познакомиться с работой специалистов реанимационной службы.
Наставником юного стажёра стал д.м.н. Дмитрий Кириллович Азовский, руководитель Центра анестезиологии-реаниматологии детского стационара. Вместе они заглянули в мир одной из самых ответственных медицинских специа…
📚Новое учебное пособие для врачей и ординаторов
📌Вышло новое учебное пособие «Практические аспекты применения ультрасонографии у пациентов с острым повреждением почек в условиях отделения реанимации и интенсивной терапии».
🩺Издание подготовлено коллективом авторов кафедры анестезиологии и реаниматологии ИНОПР РНИМУ им. Н.И. Пирогова, ГКБ№1 им Н.И. Пирогова и ММКЦ «Коммунарка» и адресовано практикующим врачам и орди…
🔉 XI Московский съезд анестезиологов-реаниматологов: встречаемся 10–11 апреля!
Коллеги, на этой неделе в столице пройдет одно из главных событий года для профессионального сообщества. В «Цифровом деловом пространстве» на Покровке, 47, соберутся ведущие эксперты и практикующие врачи, чтобы в живом диалоге определить ключевые векторы развития интенсивной терапии.
Программа съезда сфокусирована на реальной практике: о…
14 марта в рамках Российского форума по тромбозу и гемостазу состоялся симпозиум «Тромбоз и гемостаз: опыт “Коммунарки”».
Модераторами секции выступили заведующий кафедрой анестезиологии и реаниматологии ИНОПР Пироговского университета, директор ММКЦ «Коммунарка» Денис Николаевич Проценко и профессор кафедры Ефим Муневич Шифман.
В ходе симпозиума специалисты центра представили доклады, посвящённые современным подхо…
🫀Коллеги, тема риска аспирации в акушерстве стара как Mendelson (1946), но до сих пор обрастает мифами.
Свежий обзор в EJA 2026 📚 The pregnant and postpartum stomach Desai, Neel; Lawson, Jacob; Elwen, Francesca; Howle, Ryan систематизирует данные и помогает отделить страхи от физиологии.
1️⃣ Когда вообще возможна аспирация?
⏺️Нужно совпадение трёх факторов:
✅достаточный объём содержимого желудка
✅снижение тонуса ни…
🤩Почему «университетская» формула среднего АД не отражает гемодинамику❓
В клинике часто используют приближённую формулу:
АДср = (САД + 2×ДАД) / 3
❤️Она удобная, но это математическая оценка формы пульсовой волны, а не модель кровообращения.
❤️Она «работает»только при условии, что:
❤️диастола примерно в 2 раза длиннее систолы,
❤️ЧСС умеренная,
❤️нет выраженной тахикардии/брадикардии, вазоплегии или жёсткой вазокон…
Приветствуем вас, дорогие коллеги!
Мы никуда не пропадали а просто немного наблюдали за тем, что происходит с мессенджерами и блокировками.
А теперь возвращаемся к вам — и не с пустыми руками. У нас есть к вам небольшой, но интересный вопросик 👇
Остаемся в ТГ71%
Улетаем в МАХ23%
Врываемся в VK21%
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
👏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @AiRfdpornimu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Приветствуем вас, дорогие коллеги!
Мы никуда не пропадали а просто немного наблюдали за тем, что происходит с мессенджерами и блокировками.
А теперь возвращаемся к вам — и не с пустыми руками. У нас есть к вам небольшой, но интересный вопросик 👇
Остаемся в ТГ71%
Улетаем в МАХ23%
Врываемся в VK21%
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 4 February 2026 to 10 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Про Аир: Наука и практика” (@AiRfdpornimu), 2,372 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AiRfdpornimu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.