🪙 بیت کوین سقوط می کند، سپس با رسوایی تقلب انویدیا و مذاکرات ناموفق ایران باعث نوسانات می شود اقدام بی ثبات قیمت یک بار دیگر بازی های صعودی اهرمی به ارزش میلیون ها را منحل کرده است. #کریپتو #market #بیت #کوین #سقوط 💸 $CrYpTo CiTy$ 💸

Channel
CrYpTo CiTy 💸
@AiRdRoP_CiTy_iR
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
12,336subscribers
-1,037 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001634769105 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AiRdRoP_CiTy_iR |
| Description | 🌐 CRYPTO CITY 📚 Crypto Education 📰 Crypto News & Updates 📈 Market Insights 🚀 Learn. Trade. Grow. 🗓 2021/12/18 💡Support @p0oria |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 62 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AiRdRoP_CiTy_iR |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 12:47 | 12,336 | -16 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 04:07 | 12,352 | -7 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 06:30 | 12,359 | -16 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 08:27 | 12,375 | -4 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 10:06 | 12,379 | -15 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 08:01 | 12,394 | -12 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 04:49 | 12,406 | -10 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 02:21 | 12,416 | -11 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 03:49 | 12,427 | -11 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 03:50 | 12,438 | -8 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 06:16 | 12,446 | -25 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 01:49 | 12,471 | -10 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 03:47 | 12,481 | -13 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 00:18 | 12,494 | -3 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 01:16 | 12,497 | +4 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 01:59 | 12,493 | +11 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 22:49 | 12,482 | -16 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 20:17 | 12,498 | -12 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 15:19 | 12,510 | -17 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 18:51 | 12,527 | first reading |
Engagement
65 posts held, back to 29 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 62 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.76%
- avg views ÷ 12,336 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 217
- 26 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.46%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 26
- of 65 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 25 of 26 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 65 (29 September 2025 – 9 November 2026) |
| Views total | 5,647 |
| Reactions total | 80 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Nov 2026, 07:44 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,040
- Videos
- ≈15
- Links
- ≈1,400
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
850 reactions across 59 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 243 | 28.6% | |
| 🔥 | 210 | 24.7% | |
| 🐳 | 101 | 11.9% | |
| 👍 | 80 | 9.41% | |
| ❤🔥 | 62 | 7.29% | |
| 💔 | 43 | 5.06% | |
| 💯 | 34 | 4.00% | |
| 🎉 | 20 | 2.35% | |
| 🕊 | 20 | 2.35% | |
| 🏆 | 19 | 2.24% | |
| 👀 | 10 | 1.18% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 0.471% | |
| 🍾 | 3 | 0.353% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.118% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 59 of the 65 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 850 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 29 September 2025 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 13,284
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 9
- of 64 we hold a reading for · 14%
- Most on one post
- 7,010
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @AiRdRoP_CiTy_iR. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 65 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 September 2025 to 9 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 26 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🪙 یونان قانون مالیات رمزنگاری را با 10% مالیات بر سود، 15% در سهام و DeFi تصویب کرد. یونان چارچوب مالیاتی کریپتو را با آستانه سود سالانه 500 یورو (557 دلار) و قوانین جدید برای سهام و درآمد DeFi تصویب کرده است، اما قانونگذاران سؤالات مهمی در مورد مبادله توکن ها حل نشده باقی گذاشتند. #کریپتو #market #مالیات #defi #یونان 💸 $CrYpTo CiTy$ 💸
🔥3❤1
🪙 ارتقای شاخص NU7 Zcash فعال می شود و پرداخت های خصوصی را سرعت می بخشد NU7 زمان هدف بین بلوک ها را به 25 ثانیه کاهش می دهد، کیف پول های کاری را که باید برای یافتن پرداخت های خصوصی انجام دهند کاهش می دهد و هزینه هایی را برای ماینرهای آینده کنار می گذارد. #کریپتو #market #nu7 #ارتقای #شاخص 💸 $CrYpTo CiTy$ 💸
❤3🔥1
🪙 بزرگترین مدیر دارایی اروپا، آموندی صندوق شاخص سهام را در اتریوم توکن می کند طبقه جدید سهام، قرار گرفتن در معرض مبتنی بر بلاک چین را در معرض شاخصی است که 600 شرکت را در سراسر بازارهای اروپایی ردیابی می کند. #کریپتو #market #بزرگترین #مدیر #دارایی 💸 $CrYpTo CiTy$ 💸
🔥2❤1👍1
🪙 بیت کوین از افت میانمدت با افزایش پیشروی دیفای باز میگردد با پیروزی دموکرات ها در کنگره، بیت کوین از سقوط به حدود 75600 دلار بهبود یافت، در حالی که توکن های DeFi منجر به سود شدند و سکه های مرتبط با ترامپ سقوط کردند. #کریپتو #market #بیت #کوین #افت 💸 $CrYpTo CiTy$ 💸
🔥2❤1👍1
🪙 CFTC پس از پاک کردن مسیر نسخه کریپتو، بر سر سود سهام وارد درگیری قانونی می شود گروهی تحت حمایت سیتادل سکیوریتیز و سایر شرکت ها از رگولاتور مشتقات ایالات متحده به دلیل گشودن مسیری برای سودهایی که ادعا می کرد در دست SEC هستند شکایت کردند. #کریپتو #market #cftc #پس #پاک 💸 $CrYpTo CiTy$ 💸
❤1💯1🔥1
🪙 آرتور هیز: بیتکوین تا زمان انبساط ترازنامه فدرال رزرو یا بانکها با ضعف روبهرو است آرتور هیز انتظار دارد که ضعف قیمت بیتکوین (BTC) تا زمانی که فدرال رزرو آمریکا یا بانکها شروع به بزرگتر کردن ترازنامههای خود نکنند، ادامهدار باشد. این در حالی است که یکی از شاخصهای سنجش نقدینگی دلار آمریکا در سال جاری حدود ۴.۵ درصد افزایش یافته است. هیز، همبنیانگذار صرافی BitMEX و مدیر ارشد سرمایهگذاری […] #کریپتو #genera…
❤1💯1🔥1
🪙 چند روز پس از هک بایننس، سرقت رمزارز 106 میلیون دلاری در اتحادیه اروپا مشاهده شد بازرس Onchain ZachXBT می گوید که یک نهاد ناشناس اتحادیه اروپا بیش از 106 میلیون دلار از حساب های صرافی متمرکز روز یکشنبه ضرر کرده است. #کریپتو #market #106 #چند #روز 💸 $CrYpTo CiTy$ 💸
👍2❤1
🪙 شکست الگوی «آپتوبر» بیت کوین در پی تغییر روند نفت، اوراق قرضه و هوش مصنوعی؛ چه چیزی تغییر کرد؟ بیت کوین (BTC) در ماه اکتبر حدود ۷ درصد از ارزش خود را از دست داد و الگوی صعودی و فصلی معروف به «آپتوبر» را شکست. این ریزش همزمان با تضعیف معاملات مرتبط با حوزه هوش مصنوعی (AI) رخ داد. در همین حال، قیمت معاملات آتی نفت افزایش یافت؛ اما بازده اوراق خزانهداری آمریکا با […] #کریپتو #general #تغییر #شکست #الگوی 💸 $CrYpTo …
👍2❤1🐳1
🪙 سرمایه گذاران بیت کوین ETF پس از هک رکورد بایننس به سمت خروج می روند ETF های بیت کوین روز جمعه شاهد خروج 643.2 میلیون دلاری بودند که اولین جلسه معاملاتی کامل پس از هک 6.4 میلیارد دلاری Binance بود که در ماه اکتبر با تقریباً 516 میلیون دلار خروجی خالص به پایان رسید. #کریپتو #market #سرمایه #گذاران #بیت 💸 $CrYpTo CiTy$ 💸
❤2🔥2
🪙 شرکتهای وال استریت میگویند نگران هکهای ارزهای دیجیتال هستید؟ به جای آن، پروکسیهای بیتکوین را در بازار سهام بخرید تحلیلگران Cantor Fitzgerald، TD Cowen و Compass Point میگویند که سرقت بیسابقه ۶.۴ میلیارد دلاری، یک نقص امنیتی در Binance است، نه یک تهدید در سطح ارزهای دیجیتال، و مشتریان را به سمت پروکسیهایی مانند Coinbase، Robinhood و Strategy سوق میدهند. #کریپتو #market #شرکتهای #وال #استریت 💸 $CrYpTo CiTy…
❤2🔥2🐳1
🪙 تبلیغ اسرارآمیز وال استریت ژورنال جرقه جنگ جدیدی بر سر سهام توکنیزه شده است یک هشدار تمام صفحه که از مدیران اجرایی خواسته بود از معاملات توکنی شده سهام انصراف دهند، پاسخ Securitize و سؤالاتی را در مورد اینکه چه کسی برای آن پرداخت کرده بود، به همراه داشت. #کریپتو #market #تبلیغ #اسرارآمیز #وال 💸 $CrYpTo CiTy$ 💸
❤2🔥2👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 65 posts we hold for @AiRdRoP_CiTy_iR. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @AiRdRoP_CiTy_iR as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 28 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 28 August 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 33 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@cryptoo_ab · 246,832
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 10 August 2026
@signaIpersian · 53,054
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 22 August 2026
@CryptoMoney_IRR · 25,421
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 13 September 2026
@bestcheque · 138,507
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 26 August 2026
@Naji_Trade369 · 62,995
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 25 August 2026
@bitgoldkoroush · 55,378
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 15 September 2026
@irbtc · 18,260
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 4 October 2026
@BankSiignal · 29,686
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 7 September 2026
@shahrbit · 40,976
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 27 August 2026
@Tethruyne_team · 84,217
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 10 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CrYpTo CiTy 💸” (@AiRdRoP_CiTy_iR), 12,336 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AiRdRoP_CiTy_iR.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.