Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

أحاديث الرسول وأهل البيت

@Ahlulbait786

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,601subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001440827271
TypeChannel
Username@Ahlulbait786
Created28 September 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Ahlulbait786

Growth

1,5991,6031,6017 August 2026 — 1,601 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,603 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,599 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,601 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,598–1,604 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 20:071,601+2
11 Aug 2026, 18:521,599-4
8 Aug 2026, 09:461,603+2
7 Aug 2026, 11:171,601first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.51%
avg views ÷ 1,601 subscribers
Avg views / post
120
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held20 (10 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total1,683
Reactions total28
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10m 45s
Average length
36s

Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

48 reactions across 17 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2960.4%
😢1020.8%
💔816.7%
🕊12.08%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 17:14 UTC68 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

📚It is related in al-Malhūf, that the narrator says that when the household of Imām al-Husayn (عَلَيْهِ الْسَّلام) left Syria and reached Iraq, they told their guide, "Take us through Karbala". Then when they reached the place of martyrdom, they saw that Jabir bin Abdullah al-Ansari (رَضِيَ اللهُ عَنْهُ), alongwith a group of Bani Hashim and the family of the Prophet (ﷺ), had come to visit the grave of Imām al-Husay

3 Aug 2026, 14:15 UTC119 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐧 𝐨𝐟 𝐈𝐦𝐚̄𝐦 𝐚𝐥-𝐇𝐮𝐬𝐚𝐲𝐧'𝐬 𝐡𝐞𝐚𝐝 𝐭𝐨 𝐊𝐚𝐫𝐛𝐚𝐥𝐚 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐢𝐭𝐬 𝐛𝐮𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐝𝐚𝐲 𝐨𝐟 𝐀𝐫𝐛𝐚𝐞𝐞𝐧. 📚Ibn Shahrāshūb says that al-Sayyid al-Murtaḍā, in one of his treatises, says that the head of Imām al-Husayn (عَلَيْهِ الْسَّلام) was returned to Karbala from Syria and was united with the body. While al-Shaykh al-Ṭūsī relates the Ziyarat of Arbaeen from here. It is quoted in the history of Habib al-Siyar, that Yazid handed over

3 Aug 2026, 07:25 UTC93 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

📚Imam Ja'far al-Sādiq (عَلَيْهِ الْسَّلام) once told Muawiyah bin Wahhab (رَضِيَ اللهُ عَنْهُ), “O Muawiyah! The number of creatures in the heaven praying for the visitors of Imam al-Husayn (عَلَيْهِ الْسَّلام) is much more than that of those praying on this earth. O Muawiyah! Do not miss the Ziyarat of Imam al-Husayn (عَلَيْهِ الْسَّلام) out of any fear for one who leaves Ziyarat out of any fear would face such a s

4

2 Aug 2026, 17:39 UTC87 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

📚Imam Ja'far al-Sādiq (عَلَيْهِ السَّلام) has said, "When you want to go to the Ziyārah of the grave of Husayn (عَلَيْهِ السَّلام), go to his Ziyārah while you are saddened, grief-stricken, disheveled, and covered with dust, for verily Husayn (عَلَيْهِ السَّلام) was killed while he was saddened, grief-stricken, disheveled, covered with dust, thirsty, and hungry." وَ بِهَذَا الْإِسْنَادِ عَنْ سَعْدِ بْنِ عَبْدِ اللّ

1

31 Jul 2026, 07:03 UTC128 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

📚Imām Ja'far al-Sādiq (عَلَيْهِ الْسَّلام) has said in a lengthy hadith, “Verily al-Husayn bin Ali (عَلَيْهِ الْسَّلام) looks at the pilgrims who have come to his grave with their names and the names of their fathers, and he knows what they have brought in their luggage more better than they know their sons.” “….وانه لينظر إلى زواره وانه أعرف بهم وبأسمائهم وأسماء ابائهم وما في رحالهم من أحدهم بولده” 🔹Nafas al-Mahm

3

31 Jul 2026, 06:06 UTC102 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @AkhbareFori_ENPhoto

😀😃😄😁 A War Trump Can’t Win? According to Bloomberg, Donald Trump is becoming increasingly entangled in the conflict with Iran as past U.S. miscalculations continue to shape the crisis. Follow @AkhbareFori_EN for more breaking news and global updates. ✅✅✅ 🔗@AkhbareFori_EN ☠️ 🔗@AkhbareFori_EN ☠️ 🔗@AkhbareFori_EN ☠️ ✴️ Global FNC : (Follow all channels here)

29 Jul 2026, 06:01 UTC130 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

📚The Commander of the Faithful, Ali ibn Abi Talib (عَلَيْهِ الْسَّلام) has said, "It is as if I am at the Palaces (big houses) that are constructed around the grave of al-Husayn (عَلَيْهِ الْسَّلام) and as if I am with the carriages that have set out from Kufa towards the grave of al-Husayn (عَلَيْهِ الْسَّلام). And the days and nights don't pass but that they come towards it from the distant lands. And that will ha

3

26 Jul 2026, 09:45 UTC146 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📚Umm Salamah (عَلَيْهِا الْسَّلام) – the wife of the Prophet (ﷺ), said: "I did not hear the lamentation of Jinn since the night Allāh took the life of His Prophet (ﷺ) until tonight, and I believe that I have been afflicted by the killing of my son, al-Husayn . I heard a Jinni recite (the following poem): ‘Oh, my eyes, pour yourselves out with effort, For who will weep for the martyrs after me? Over a group led by

2

23 Jul 2026, 16:44 UTC139 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

📚Ali ibn Sā’id Al-Barbari said: I went to Imām al-Ridhā (عَلَيْهِ السَّلاَم) and he asked me, "What do people say about owls?" I replied, "May I sacrifice myself for you! We have come here to ask you (about this)." Imām said: "At the time of my grandfather, the Messenger of Allāh (ﷺ), owls used to live in palaces, houses, and developed structures. When people used to eat, owls would fly and sit next to them and peop

2

22 Jul 2026, 05:59 UTC137 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

📚Abū ‘Abdillāh Imām al-Sādiq (عَلَيْهِ السَّلاَم) once asked, “Have you ever seen an owl during the day?” People replied, “No, it never appears during the day. It only appears at night.” The Imam said: “The owls used to take only developed structures as abodes but when al-Husayn (عَلَيْهِ السَّلاَم) was killed, they refused to stay in developed structures and refused to take anything but wreckages as abodes. Verily

1🕊1

20 Jul 2026, 14:58 UTC128 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🏴🥀Heartfelt condolences on the martyrdom anniversary of Ruqayyah bint al-Husayn (عَلَيْهِا الْسَّلام) to all the believers🥀🏴 📚It is related in Kamil al-Bahai from Kitab al-Hawiyah that the family of Prophethood had concealed from the children regarding the martyrdom of their fathers. They told them that their fathers had been on a journey, until Yazid called them to his house. A four year old daughter of Imam al-Hu

1

19 Jul 2026, 17:57 UTC134 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🏴𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗠𝗮𝗿𝘁𝘆𝗿𝗱𝗼𝗺 𝗼𝗳 𝗥𝘂𝗾𝗮𝘆𝘆𝗮𝗵 𝗯𝗶𝗻𝘁 𝗮𝗹-𝗛𝘂𝘀𝗮𝘆𝗻 (عَلَيْهِا الْسَّلام)🏴 📚From 'Al-‘Awālim' and other sources, it is summarized that Imām al-Husayn (عَلَيْهِ الْسَّلام) had a young daughter whom he loved dearly, and she loved him in return. It was said that her name was Ruqayyah, and she was only three years old. She was among the captives taken to Sham (Damascus) after the tragedy. She wept for her father day and night, an

💔51

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Ahlulbait786. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,409,727 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“أحاديث الرسول وأهل البيت” (@Ahlulbait786), 1,601 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ahlulbait786.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.