Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 43 days, net -138. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,748–6,930 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 16:00
6,771
+2
15 Sept 2026, 03:41
6,769
-12
11 Sept 2026, 18:19
6,781
-11
6 Sept 2026, 22:19
6,792
-23
2 Sept 2026, 13:15
6,815
-4
30 Aug 2026, 13:56
6,819
-14
27 Aug 2026, 13:04
6,833
-7
24 Aug 2026, 23:34
6,840
-6
21 Aug 2026, 03:36
6,846
-21
17 Aug 2026, 21:53
6,867
-9
14 Aug 2026, 21:43
6,876
-17
11 Aug 2026, 09:58
6,893
-5
8 Aug 2026, 05:18
6,898
-11
7 Aug 2026, 14:16
6,909
first reading
Engagement
60 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 60 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4m 12s
Average length
1m 24s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
990 reactions across 56 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
557
56.3%
👍
281
28.4%
👎
50
5.05%
👏
45
4.55%
🔥
31
3.13%
👌
9
0.909%
🙏
9
0.909%
❤🔥
6
0.606%
💔
1
0.101%
🤣
1
0.101%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 56 of the 60 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 990 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 60 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
توصیه برادرانه من به شما اینه:
سطوح جعلی رو با عمق وجودتون درک کنید.
در دوره القای نقدینگی بهش پرداختیم.
سطح مصرف شده یا ترپها یا ساختار لست تریک بهترین قطب نمای تحلیل شماست.
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLPiNIa5AQ8xJNc0kpOSK7pejYfC3uP6FD&si=RP_188Kcen8g-0Dc
در باب حرکت بیت کوین
امروز قیمت سناریو لست تریک اجرا و سطح جعلی مد نظر رو درو کرد (سناریو پیام صوتی ریپلای شده).
البته که انتظار ما این بود این حرکت از کمی پایینتر شروع شود اما نکته مهم این است که تشخیص سطوح جعلی، نقدینگی و ساختارهای مهم کمک بسیاری به تحلیل و ترید ما میکند.
گرچه ما بخشی از حرکت را ازدست دادیم و این هم بخشی از بازار است ، اما خوانش قیمت به واسطه سطوح فیک و ساختارهای لست تریک بسیار راهگشاست.
ب…
⏳ تیک تاک
شروع نزدیک است.
ثبت نامتونو کامل کنید.
شاید فردا دیگر دسترسی رایگانی نباشد یا سطح واریز افزایش یابد پس همین الان ثبت نام و حسابتو فعال کن
https://t.me/AgoraTradeSchool/21
در پایان مدرسه معاملهگری چه چیزی به دست میآورید؟
هدف ما این نیست که صرفاً چند سبک و ستاپ معاملاتی جدید به شما آموزش بدهیم.
در پایان مدرسه معاملهگری، باید به یک سیستم معاملاتی شخصیسازیشده برسید؛ سیستمی که ستاپها، قوانین ورود و خروج و مدیریت معامله در آن، متناسب با شخصیت، سبک ترید و ویژگیهای روانشناختی خود شما طراحی شده باشد.
ما در این مسیر قدمبهقدم کنارتان هستیم تا این سیستم را بسازید، آزمایش کنید و بهینه…
بعد از جنگ و قطعی اینترنت، ویوهای آگورا بهشدت کاهش پیدا کرد.
وقتی اینترنت دوباره وصل شد، ازتون خواستیم اگر آگورا براتون ارزشمنده، بیشتر از همیشه حمایتمون کنید؛ ببینید، به اشتراک بذارید و کمک کنید دوباره به جایگاه قبل برگردیم.
و نتیجه این حمایت رو حالا در همین تصاویر و ویوهایی که به دست اومده میبینید.
اما برای ما این فقط چند عدد نیست؛ بیشتر از همیشه نشون داد که آگورا فقط یک صفحه نیست، یک خانوادهست.
خانوادهای که…
📊 تحلیل فوری بیتکوین | کامران مرادی | ۲۷ مرداد
بیتکوین با مومنتوم بالا به محدوده تعیینکننده ۶۴,۹۰۰ تا ۶۵,۱۰۰ رسیده؛ حالا واکنش قیمت به این ناحیه اهمیت زیادی دارد.
آیا این حرکت صعودی ادامهدار است یا یک حرکت فیک پیش از اصلاح؟
در این شرایط، چرا باید منتظر تریگر و تأیید رفتار قیمت ماند؟
مدیریت ریسک و صبر برای تأیید سناریو، فعلاً مهمتر از عجله برای ورود است.
اگر تحلیل برایتان مفید بود، برای دوستان معاملهگرتان ار…
اگر آگورا را قبول دارید پست بالا را شیر کنید برای هر کسی که میخواهد در این مسیر با ما باشد. مدرسه هیج پیشنیازی ندارد.
روزشمار شروع در حال صفر شدن است و سوپرایز اول بزودی رونمایی میشود.
باهم در کنار هم تا رسیدن به یک نگاه درست و کاربردی، و قرار گرفتن در مسیر موفقیت و کسب سود. این شعار مدرسه مالی آگوراست. یک مدرسه علمی و کاربردی با نوین ترین شیوههای آموزشی و تربیتی روز دنیا. این محصول بیش از یکسال تلاش و تحقیق هستش و سعی خواهیم کرد نام آگورا با مدرسه جاودانه شود.
https://t.me/AgoraTradeSchool/21
در ادامه به اشتراک گذاری استیتمنت.
نسبت به تصویر گذشته معاملات بای شاخص S&p و سل نفت ماه خوبی را رقم زد.
این استیتمنت مدام گذاشته شده و میشود.
در ٧ ما اخیر بازدهی ٣١.٨ درصد
البته اگر سواپ و کمیسیون نفت و اس اند پی نبود بازدهی به ۴۵ درصد هم میرسید.
نسبت بازدهی به ریسک = ٣١/١٠ = ٣ ( در این لحظه)
هدف مدرسه مالی آگورا این است چگونه با ذهن درست رشد پایدار حساب را تجربه کنیم.
اطلاعات بیشتر برای تخفیف صد در صدی دسترسی…
👍16❤3👎1👏1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 60 posts we hold for @AgoraEco. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
اگر همین الان کل سرمایهت ١٠ هزار دلار باشه و و فقط باید روی بیتکوین معامله/سرمایهگذاری کنی، چه تصمیمی میگرفتی!؟
صبر میکنم.27%
پلهای میخرم ( پله اول مارکت یا یکم بالا یا پایینتر میخرم)34%
بخشیش رو فیوچرز اوردر سل میکاشتم و بقیهشو منتظر خرید بلند مدت میموندم!؟24%
حوصله داری!؟ همشو یکجا میخرم تا سال بعد.4%
همشو میبردم فیوچرز ترید میکردم.11%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 60 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 19 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
TSESTOCKS @tsestocks · 26,680 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AgoraEco بیتکوین اکونومیست” (@AgoraEco), 6,771 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AgoraEco.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.