Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🇺🇸 Afzal Lokhandwala (US Investing Champion)

Channel

🇺🇸 Afzal Lokhandwala (US Investing Champion)

@AfzalLokhandwalaUS

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

17,724subscribers

-226 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001952547855
TypeChannel
Username@AfzalLokhandwalaUS
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/AfzalLokhandwalaUS

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

17,72417,95017,8377 August 2026 — 17,950 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,947 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,943 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,934 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,920 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,907 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,903 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,899 subscribers16 August 2026 — 17,889 subscribers17 August 2026 — 17,865 subscribers18 August 2026 — 17,861 subscribers19 August 2026 — 17,862 subscribers21 August 2026 — 17,863 subscribers22 August 2026 — 17,861 subscribers24 August 2026 — 17,860 subscribers25 August 2026 — 17,846 subscribers26 August 2026 — 17,838 subscribers27 August 2026 — 17,830 subscribers28 August 2026 — 17,826 subscribers29 August 2026 — 17,832 subscribers30 August 2026 — 17,827 subscribers31 August 2026 — 17,815 subscribers1 September 2026 — 17,809 subscribers2 September 2026 — 17,803 subscribers3 September 2026 — 17,809 subscribers6 September 2026 — 17,801 subscribers9 September 2026 — 17,776 subscribers11 September 2026 — 17,763 subscribers13 September 2026 — 17,751 subscribers15 September 2026 — 17,743 subscribers17 September 2026 — 17,724 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 41 days, net -226. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,690–17,984 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 09:4017,724-19
15 Sept 2026, 12:4217,743-8
13 Sept 2026, 18:3917,751-12
11 Sept 2026, 20:5717,763-13
9 Sept 2026, 08:5517,776-25
6 Sept 2026, 01:0117,801-8
3 Sept 2026, 20:2117,809+6
2 Sept 2026, 14:5517,803-6
1 Sept 2026, 15:1417,809-6
31 Aug 2026, 12:2617,815-12
30 Aug 2026, 09:5417,827-5
29 Aug 2026, 11:0817,832+6
28 Aug 2026, 08:0417,826-4
27 Aug 2026, 04:4717,830-8
26 Aug 2026, 06:2617,838-8
25 Aug 2026, 05:5817,846-14
24 Aug 2026, 07:0417,860-1
22 Aug 2026, 14:0217,861-2
21 Aug 2026, 07:2417,863+1
19 Aug 2026, 11:4417,862first reading

Engagement

32 posts held, back to 9 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.8%
avg views ÷ 17,724 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,790
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
6
of 32 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held32 (9 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total16,750
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 09:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 06s
Average length
2m 06s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 04:50 UTC≈1,570 viewsread 3 September 2026
File

Wavy-base breakout on the chart of Heating Oil Futures.

30 Aug 2026, 15:59 UTC≈2,540 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Chart Whispers Report : USA 30 August Edition is Live. Exclusively for our email list. If you haven’t subscribed yet, register HERE to get it in your inbox every week! Highlights:- • ETSY’s 3.7x move in 2017-2019 • S&P 500 trading near highs, smallcaps contracting near moving averages • 6 charts fresh out of their bases, 4 still building • These Copper & Oil stocks showing clear confluence • Members Trade • Member

27 Aug 2026, 16:17 UTC≈3,330 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

$AGYS is breaking out today! The stock was covered in our previous report (16th August Edition) where we identified this stock in the "basing" category. Refer: LINK Not all stocks identified in "basing" category actually breakout. But the ones that do, the likelihood of the continuation of stage 2 increases. And that is why you should read our Chart Whispers Report every week. We show you charts in early stage 2

26 Aug 2026, 15:47 UTC≈3,420 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

I entered #COFFEE on 24th Aug. Today, it hit the predefined stoploss, so I exited the trade. Refer to my entry: Here No second thoughts. No hope of recovery. Nothing. The structure still looks intact. If it sets up again and presents a valid opportunity, I may attempt the trade again. Until then, the trade is over.

25 Aug 2026, 14:35 UTC≈3,470 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Bought $RCUS today! The stock broke out of its first base into stage 2. Biotechs are doing well. afzallokhandwala.com/club

24 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC≈3,520 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

$COFFEE kept falling for almost a year before showing a clear turnaround, supported by strong volume. It then formed a clean early Stage 2 base. Today, it broke out of that base. This could be the start of a fresh move into the Growth Stage. afzallokhandwala.com/club

23 Aug 2026, 13:11 UTC≈3,600 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Chart Whispers Report : USA 23 August Edition is Live. Exclusively for our email list. If you haven’t subscribed yet, register HERE to get it in your inbox every week! Highlights:- • NVDA’s 12X move in 2015-18 • S&P 500 trading near highs, smallcaps drifted to moving averages • 10 charts fresh out of their bases, 6 still building • Agilent Tech strengthened the Stage 2 move, featured in the Aug 9 report • These Co

21 Aug 2026, 16:48 UTC≈3,840 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

On 13 June, I shared a few copper stocks that were basing right. Refer: Link Now, some of them are breaking out. Have a look at the charts of $FCX, $FM Some of them ($TKO, $SCCO, $HBM) are still within the base and looking at the overall scenario, they are likely to breakout soon. All of this goes back to my bullish view on copper that I shared on Feb 4. Refer: here. Copper is taking off from a higher timeframe s

16 Aug 2026, 12:08 UTC≈5,000 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Chart Whispers Report : USA 16 August Edition is Live. Exclusively for our email list. If you haven’t subscribed yet, register HERE to get it in your inbox every week! Highlights:- • Stage 2 Case Study: How RNG shot up 1000% • S&P500 and SMALLCAP Index • Stage 2 Stocks In Focus • Inside Champions Club • Champions Club Meetup at Delhi Trade Like A Champion. afzallokhandwala.com/club

11 Aug 2026, 18:49 UTC≈5,690 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Applovin ($APP) is down another 5%. The stock is making headlines today. (Bank of America downgraded the rating.) Traders and investors are reacting in panic. I identified the change in character 6 months back, just by looking at the charts, and flagged the weakness. Refer to the thread: Here Price and volume always tell the story. Learn the language of the market. It's charts. afzallokhandwala.com/club

10 Aug 2026, 16:54 UTC≈5,180 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

On 3rd Feb, I flagged $APP. After a huge run from the bottom, its character had changed. I said it was time to say goodbye to #APPLOVIN! Refer: Here Six months later, it formed another rounding top. It's down ~27%. More downside is possible. Big money doesn't chase a stock after a 3+ year run. They definitely don't chase it once it goes parabolic. That's the public, buying at the top. Smart money isn't buying ther

Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @AfzalLokhandwalaUS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

INDmoney
@indmoneyofficial · 28,169
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 September 2026
LEGEND PRO CRYPTO
@legendprocrypto · 31,053
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 6 September 2026
Vivek Mashrani - Technofunda Investing
@TechnoFunda_Investing · 52,803
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🇺🇸 Afzal Lokhandwala (US Investing Champion)” (@AfzalLokhandwalaUS), 17,724 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AfzalLokhandwalaUS.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.