Channel
@Aesthetikmaschine
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
207subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002370920649 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Aesthetikmaschine |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Aesthetikmaschine |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:15 | 207 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:48 | 207 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 5 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
103 reactions across 18 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 27 | 26.2% | |
| 🔥 | 22 | 21.4% | |
| ❤ | 16 | 15.5% | |
| 👏 | 12 | 11.7% | |
| 💯 | 9 | 8.74% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 2.91% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 2.91% | |
| 💅 | 3 | 2.91% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 1.94% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 1.94% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.971% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 0.971% | |
| 🙉 | 1 | 0.971% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 0.971% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 103reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2025 to 2 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
So wie ich das sehe, haben die Menschen heute nur noch einen Zweck: KI so weit voranzutreiben, bis die fleißigen Bienchen ohne eigenes Gehirn für die Elite endgültig überflüssig geworden sind. KI wird bis dahin der neue Gott der Sklaven. Die gleichen Witzfiguren, die heute bereits Demokratie, den Staat, seine Gesetze, seine Moral und die Wissenschaft blind ernst nehmen, werden auch die KI, die all diese Dinge mit pe…
👍4🔥1
Du glaubst, du müsstest Pflanzen essen, wegen Vitaminen und Blutwerten. Du glaubst, du müsstest eine Maske tragen, wegen der Gefahr einer Ansteckung. Du glaubst, du müsstest verhüten wegen Ansteckung und Kinder. Du glaubst, du musst deine Zähne putzen, Shampoo verwenden und täglich duschen. Du glaubst, du müsstest Pulver essen wegen Vitaminen und Blutwerten. Du glaubst, Krankheit sei ein böses Übel. Du glaubst,…
💯9❤1🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
⚡3
Als heutiges 200 Abonnenten-Special, gibt es von mir einen Nackt Livestream mit Kommentar zur heutigen Simulation einer Mondumrundung.
❤4🎉3🤝2
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥5
Glauben und Wissen Es ist kein grundsätzlicher Fehler, sich Ad hominem, Strohmännern und logischen Fehlschluss-Argumenten zu bedienen. Es macht Spaß, und in der alltäglichen Welt zählen rednerische Gabe und Erscheinung, wenn man ehrlich ist, ohnehin mehr als die Expertise des dick bebrillten Nerds. Heute jedoch haben wir es, vor allem im Internet, mit einem Menschenschlag zu tun, der weder reden kann noch gut aussi…
👏2👍1🙉1
All das sind Denkmodelle, die auf bestimmten Messanordnungen und Rechenverfahren beruhen nicht auf einem direkten Zugang zur Wirklichkeit. Genauso in der Astronomie: Das Michelson-Morley-Experiment fand keine klare Bewegungssignatur der Erde, wird aber bis heute so gedeutet, dass das bestehende Himmelsmodell erhalten bleibt; und wenn man aus ein paar Spektrallinien im Teleskop die Zusammensetzung ferner, als materie…
👍9
Stoffer: Traum vs. Realität
💅2😁1
Links: Based germanischer Krieger, beweglich und gesund. Rechts: Stoffender Sklavengorilla. Schwache Witzfigur!
👏4🤔2🔥1
Die Bronzeskulptur zeigt Joan Mas (1520-1607) und befindet sich in den Jardines Joan March in Pollença, Nordmallorca. In der Nacht des 30. Mai 1550 griffen türkische Korsaren unter Dragut die Stadt an. Joan Mas organisierte die lokalen Milizen und führte die Stadtbewohner in den Kampf gegen die Angreifer. Trotz zahlenmäßiger Unterlegenheit und einfacher Bewaffnung gelang die Verteidigung der Stadt. Die Statue steht…
👍3
Es mag Menschen geben, die den Willen zur Macht ins Unendliche steigern können. Für die meisten jedoch wird daraus irgendwann ein Zwang zur Macht, weil man inzwischen extrem viel davon braucht, um nicht unterworfen zu werden. Der treffendere Begriff, wäre wohl der Wille, kein Opfer zu sein und selbst das ist eine Abwägung, denn auch dem Drang zur Macht will ich kein Opfer werden.
👏2
Warum es keine universelle Moral gibt - nur den Willen des Körpers Der Mensch ist keine Maschine nach einfachen Regeln. Es gibt keine im Geiste erfundenen Philosophien oder spirituellen Regeln, die das menschliche Dasein gänzlich auffassen und für jeden im Sinne einer in Worten geschriebenen und auswendig gelernten Lebensanweisung Wahrheit sprechen können. Jung - alt, groß - klein, stark - schwach, gesund - krank. A…
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Aesthetikmaschine. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 48,420 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Aesthetikmaschinerie” (@Aesthetikmaschine), 207 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Aesthetikmaschine.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.