Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Advokat Abdullayev | Rasmiy

Channel

Advokat Abdullayev | Rasmiy

@Advokat_Abdullayev

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

29,635subscribers

-717 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001188333566
TypeChannel
Username@Advokat_Abdullayev
DescriptionУшбу каналда адвокат Абдуллаев Абдумаликнинг ҳуқуқий йўналишда, айниқса тергов ва суд жараёнларига оид юқори савиядаги профессионал фикр-мулоҳазалари, муносабатлари бериб борилади. Мурожаат учун: +998900184808
Created14 January 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Advokat_Abdullayev

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

29,63530,35229,993.56 August 2026 — 30,352 subscribers6 August 2026 — 30,330 subscribers7 August 2026 — 30,321 subscribers8 August 2026 — 30,276 subscribers9 August 2026 — 30,250 subscribers10 August 2026 — 30,207 subscribers11 August 2026 — 30,178 subscribers12 August 2026 — 30,158 subscribers14 August 2026 — 30,128 subscribers15 August 2026 — 30,107 subscribers16 August 2026 — 30,171 subscribers17 August 2026 — 30,167 subscribers18 August 2026 — 30,161 subscribers19 August 2026 — 30,154 subscribers21 August 2026 — 30,131 subscribers22 August 2026 — 30,100 subscribers24 August 2026 — 30,042 subscribers25 August 2026 — 30,045 subscribers26 August 2026 — 30,019 subscribers27 August 2026 — 30,008 subscribers28 August 2026 — 29,989 subscribers29 August 2026 — 29,972 subscribers30 August 2026 — 29,951 subscribers31 August 2026 — 29,928 subscribers1 September 2026 — 29,913 subscribers2 September 2026 — 29,887 subscribers3 September 2026 — 29,861 subscribers5 September 2026 — 29,825 subscribers8 September 2026 — 29,812 subscribers11 September 2026 — 29,786 subscribers13 September 2026 — 29,739 subscribers14 September 2026 — 29,695 subscribers16 September 2026 — 29,647 subscribers19 September 2026 — 29,635 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 44 days, net -717. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,527–30,460 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 02:1829,635-12
16 Sept 2026, 19:5929,647-48
14 Sept 2026, 22:5929,695-44
13 Sept 2026, 10:1529,739-47
11 Sept 2026, 12:3729,786-26
8 Sept 2026, 19:3929,812-13
5 Sept 2026, 13:3829,825-36
3 Sept 2026, 12:0229,861-26
2 Sept 2026, 05:5329,887-26
1 Sept 2026, 06:0329,913-15
31 Aug 2026, 04:3529,928-23
30 Aug 2026, 06:4329,951-21
29 Aug 2026, 08:4429,972-17
28 Aug 2026, 10:2529,989-19
27 Aug 2026, 11:1330,008-11
26 Aug 2026, 08:2630,019-26
25 Aug 2026, 04:5630,045+3
24 Aug 2026, 00:1530,042-58
22 Aug 2026, 09:4530,100-31
21 Aug 2026, 00:3230,131first reading

Engagement

92 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 65 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.6%
avg views ÷ 29,635 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,960
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.899%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 92 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 September 2026
Posts held92 (24 July 202619 September 2026)
Views total288,880
Reactions total2,596
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken21 Sept 2026, 06:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
402
Videos
162
Links
878

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 21 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
13m 35s
Average length
2m 43s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

6,721 reactions across 83 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3,12946.6%
97914.6%
💯97014.4%
🔥5658.41%
👏2313.44%
🥴2113.14%
🤔2012.99%
🤬1782.65%
👎1031.53%
🕊711.06%
👌570.848%
🥰170.253%
🤝60.089%
❤‍🔥30.045%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 92 of the 92 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,473 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 92 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 19 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Sept 2026, 11:05 UTC≈4,890 views90 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Photo

Суд залида "рад" деган сўз кўпайса ... "Реал Санжик" ишида ҳимоя томони прокурорга ҳам, учала судьяга ҳам раддия билдиргани айтилмоқда. Бунга ўнга яқин илтимосноманинг рад этилгани сабаб қилиб кўрсатилган. Албатта, ҳар бир илтимоснома қаноатлантирилиши шарт эмас. Лекин уни рад этишдан олдин ундаги саволга жавоб бериш шарт. Ҳимоя далилни текширишни сўраса, унга шунчаки "йўқ" дейиш одамларнинг кўнглидаги шубҳани тарқ

👍51💯228🔥7🕊2

18 Sept 2026, 12:55 UTC≈7,370 views64 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Photo

Аввал тинтув, кейин судми? Масала Конституциявий судга етиб борди Инсон ҳуқуқлари бўйича Ўзбекистон Республикаси Миллий маркази муҳим масала юзасидан Конституциявий судга мурожаат қилди. Конституция аниқ айтади, яъни уй-жойда тинтув фақат қонунга мувофиқ ва суд қарори асосида ўтказилади. Марказнинг принципиал позицияси ва адвокат Шавкат Вахабовнинг бу борадаги фаоллиги эътирофга лойиқ. 👉Батафсил @Advokat_Abdulla

👍40💯127👌3🕊2

18 Sept 2026, 11:09 UTC≈7,460 views92 reactionsread 21 September 2026

Аввал тинтув, кейин суд - бу Конституциядаги тартибми? Конституция аниқ айтади, яъни уй-жойда тинтув фақат қонунга мувофиқ ва суд қарори асосида ўтказилади. ЖПК эса "кечиктириб бўлмайдиган ҳолат" деган умумий ибора билан аввал уйга киришга, тинтув ўтказишга, нарсаларни олиб чиқишга, кейин эса суддан бу ҳаракатнинг қонунийлигини текширишни сўрашга рухсат бермоқда. Аммо кейин чиқарилган ажрим кеча ўтказилган тинтувн

👍6114👎8💯8🕊1

16 Sept 2026, 12:42 UTC≈6,840 views55 reactionsread 21 September 2026

Адвокат ўшанда қонунда йўқ норма билан жазоланганмиди? Маъмурий жавобгарлик тўғрисидаги кодекснинг 180-моддасига муҳим ўзгартиш киритилди. Энди тартибни бузишда ифодаланган судга ҳурматсизлик нафақат суд мажлиси пайтида, балки суд биносида содир этилса ҳам жавобгарликка сабаб бўлиши мумкин. Биз ҳам вақтида қонуннинг амалдаги матнидан келиб чиқиб, "Суд мажлиси йўқ жойда “судга ҳурматсизлик” ҳам йўқ" деган сарлавҳа о

👍33💯126🔥2🕊2

16 Sept 2026, 08:53 UTC≈6,640 views101 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Photo

Бир қарашда прокуратура, аслида суд аппарати Формани кўриб, тўғриси, узоқдан прокуратура ходимларининг янги хизмат либоси бўлса керак, деб ўйлабмиз. Тўқ кўк китель, тилларанг тугмалар, галстук, елкада погон ва юлдузлар... Кейин матнни ўқисак, булар суд аппарати ходимлари экан. Албатта, суд ходимининг тартибли, озода ва бир хил либосда юриши яхши. Лекин форма ходимни танитиш ўрнига бошқа идора билан адаштирса, унин

💯49👍32🔥10👎9🕊1

14 Sept 2026, 14:26 UTC≈9,240 views148 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Video

Уйини сотгани борган эди, электрон базадан хотин чиқди! Ангренлик эркак ҳовлисини сотиш учун нотариусга борибди. Ҳужжатлар текширилса, электрон базадан "иккинчи хотин" чиқибди. Эркак ёқа ушлабди: — Бу хотинга қачон уйланганман? Тўй қаерда бўлган? Нега куёвнинг ўзига айтилмаган?! На тўй бўлган, на ош берилган. На келинни кўрган, на никоҳдан хабари бор. Аммо базанинг гапи битта: "Хотинингиз бор!" Энг қизиғи, бу ник

🥴89🤔3511💯8👏5

9 Sept 2026, 14:11 UTC≈10,200 views55 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Photo

Баъзан бутун иш тақдирини битта тўғри савол ҳал қилади Суд экспертизаси иш жилдига қўшиб қўйиладиган оддий қоғоз эмас. У айбловни тасдиқлаши ҳам, унинг пойдеворини битта хулоса билан қулатиши ҳам мумкин. Адвокат экспертга қандай савол қўйишни, хулосада нима айтилганинигина эмас, нима айтилмай қолганини ҳам кўра билиши керак. Чунки кучли ҳимоя тахминдан эмас, тўғри қўйилган савол, илмий хулоса ва синчков таҳлилдан

👍3712💯4🕊2

9 Sept 2026, 13:48 UTC≈14,800 views55 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Photo

Судни ҳимоя қилишнинг йўли адвокатни сукутга чақириш эмас Тошкент шаҳар судларининг расмий баёноти аниқ суд иши ҳақида гапириш, судьянинг исмини қайд этиш ва ҳимоя позициясини билдиришнинг ўзи ҳам этикага зиддек таассурот қолдирмоқда. Ҳолбуки, "Мажбурий тушунтиришлар"нинг 10-банди адвокатлик сири сақланган ҳолда ҳимоя позицияси, очиқ суд муҳокамаси ва суд қарорларининг асослантирилган танқидий таҳлилини эълон қилиш

👍28💯18🔥54

8 Sept 2026, 15:35 UTC≈14,400 views133 reactionsread 21 September 2026

Суд қарори танқиддан дахлсиз эмас Тошкент шаҳар судларининг расмий канали адвокат ва блогер 𝐀𝐛𝐝𝐮𝐦𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐤𝐨𝐯𝐢𝐜𝐡нинг ҳуқуқий фикрига муносабат билдириб, адвокат суд ҳужжатига “ҳуқуқий баҳо” беришга ҳақли эмаслигини таъкидлабди. Ҳурмат билан айтганда, бу ерда икки тушунча аралаштирилган. Суд қарорини бекор қилиш, ўзгартириш ёки кучида қолдириш, албатта юқори суднинг ваколати. Аммо уни ўқиш, таҳлил қилиш ва қонун нуқтаи на

👍79💯35🔥107🕊2

8 Sept 2026, 09:17 UTC≈7,420 views64 reactionsread 21 September 2026

Судьяликка йўл ёшармоқда, одил судловчи? Судьялик ёшини 35 дан 30 ёшга тушириш ижобий таклиф. Чунки 30 ёшида ҳам етарли билим, тажриба ва қатъий ҳуқуқий позицияга эга юристлар бор. Лекин судьялик оддий лавозим эмас. Унинг бир қарори билан инсон озодликка чиқиши ҳам, йиллаб панжара ортида қолиши ҳам мумкин. Шунинг учун номзоднинг ёшидан кўра, унинг қонунни билиши, виждони ва босим олдида эгилмаслиги муҳим. Судья

👍35🔥138💯7👎1

8 Sept 2026, 08:42 UTC≈6,340 views59 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Photo

Туркий давлатлар адвокатлари Тошкентда футбол майдонида учрашади 2026 йил 11–12 сентябрь кунлари Тошкент шаҳрида Туркий давлатлар адвокатлари ўртасида илк бор халқаро футбол мусобақаси ўтказилади. Мусобақада Ўзбекистон, Туркия, Озарбайжон, Туркманистон, Қозоғистон ва Қирғизистон адвокатларидан иборат жамоалар иштирок этади. Жамоамизни қўллаб-қувватлаш ва қизиқарли ўйинларни томоша қилишга таклиф этамиз! 11–12 сен

👍4411💯2🕊2

8 Sept 2026, 07:18 UTC≈7,040 views96 reactionsread 21 September 2026

Ҳукм йўқ, жазо тайёр: Биз ҳуқуқшуносми ёки айбловчи тафаккурни тайёрлаяпмиз? Депутат оддий, аммо оғриқли савол берди: — Судья ишни якунига етказмай кетса, янги судья ишни бошидан кўрса, инсон изоляторда йўқотган вақт нима бўлади? Расмий жавобнинг мазмуни эса ҳуқуқий тафаккуримиздаги эски касалликни очиб қўйди: — Жазо тайинланганда чегириб ташланади. Бир дақиқа... Нега албатта жазо тайинланиши керак? Ҳали ҳукм йўқ.

👍54💯2210🔥10

Showing the 12 most recent of 92 posts we hold for @Advokat_Abdullayev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 22 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Advokat Abdullayev | Rasmiy” (@Advokat_Abdullayev), 29,635 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Advokat_Abdullayev.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.