Ушбу каналда адвокат Абдуллаев Абдумаликнинг ҳуқуқий йўналишда, айниқса тергов ва суд жараёнларига оид юқори савиядаги профессионал фикр-мулоҳазалари, муносабатлари бериб борилади.
Мурожаат учун: +998900184808
Created
14 January 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
62 measurements spanning 93 days, net -1,402. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,740–30,562 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 00:21
28,950
-18
5 Nov 2026, 20:46
28,968
-9
4 Nov 2026, 23:15
28,977
-15
3 Nov 2026, 22:56
28,992
-19
2 Nov 2026, 22:49
29,011
-2
2 Nov 2026, 01:08
29,013
-12
1 Nov 2026, 04:10
29,025
-2
31 Oct 2026, 01:39
29,027
-6
30 Oct 2026, 04:50
29,033
-25
29 Oct 2026, 01:48
29,058
-17
27 Oct 2026, 23:27
29,075
-12
27 Oct 2026, 01:20
29,087
-20
25 Oct 2026, 23:05
29,107
-12
24 Oct 2026, 19:39
29,119
-22
23 Oct 2026, 16:27
29,141
-29
22 Oct 2026, 19:20
29,170
-24
21 Oct 2026, 12:55
29,194
-9
20 Oct 2026, 10:56
29,203
-14
19 Oct 2026, 11:58
29,217
-20
18 Oct 2026, 11:31
29,237
first reading
Engagement
145 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 152 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
30.2%
avg views ÷ 28,950 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,730
35 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.674%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
35
of 145 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
145 (24 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
305,620
Reactions total
2,061
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 01:32 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
430
Videos
163
Links
912
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
14m 46s
Average length
2m 28s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
10,554 reactions across 136 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
5,106
48.4%
💯
1,541
14.6%
❤
1,490
14.1%
🔥
900
8.53%
👏
399
3.78%
🥴
276
2.62%
🤬
219
2.08%
🤔
208
1.97%
👎
139
1.32%
🕊
125
1.18%
👌
98
0.929%
🤝
28
0.265%
🥰
22
0.208%
❤🔥
3
0.028%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 145 of the 145 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,306 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 145 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 8 of 35 posts held from the last 30 days (22.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Тақиқланган материаллар: маъмурий жавобгарлик белгиланди
2026 йил 2 ноябрдаги ЎРҚ–1185-сон Қонун билан Маъмурий жавобгарлик тўғрисидаги кодексга янги 184⁵-модда киритилди.
Унга кўра, экстремизм, сепаратизм ёки ақидапарастлик ғоялари билан йўғрилган, қирғинга ёки фуқароларни зўрлик билан кўчириб юборишга чақирувчи, шунингдек аҳоли орасида ваҳима чиқаришга қаратилган материалларни тайёрлаш ёки тарқатиш мақсадида сақл…
Олий суд раҳбариятида ўзгариш
Сенат Кенгашининг қарори билан Фаррух Сойибжонович Абдураимов беш йил муддатга Ўзбекистон Республикаси Олий суди раисининг биринчи ўринбосари — судлов ҳайъати раиси лавозимига сайланди.
Шунингдек, Алишер Атаханович Усманов Олий суд раисининг биринчи ўринбосари лавозимидан озод этилди.
@Advokat_Abdullayev
Инсон тақдири қолдиқдаги иш эмас
Бугун Наманган вилояти судининг кассация инстанциясида судлов ҳайъатига раддия билдиришга мажбур бўлдик. Раддиямиз рад этилди.
Сўнг, суд мажлисининг белгиланган вақтда бошланмагани ҳақидаги эътирозимизга раислик этувчи "Бизни ҳам тўғри тушунинглар, ҳар биримизнинг иш юритувимизда қолдиқда камида 30 та жиноят иши бор", дея юкламанинг оғирлигини таъкидлади.
Судьяларни тушунамиз. Аммо…
Давлат божи: ҳақни талаб қилиш нега қиммат?
Адвокат Муҳриддин Шамсиддиновнинг ушбу мақоласи ҳар қандай амалиётчи юристнинг эътиборидан четда қолмаса керак. Унда суд ҳимоясидан фойдаланишга бевосита таъсир қиладиган масала шуки, фуқаролик ва иқтисодий судларда давлат божини ҳисоблашдаги фарқлар кўтарилган.
Биринчи масала. Шартномани бекор қилиш. Фуқаролик судида Пленум тушунтириши асосида шартнома баҳосидан 4 фоиз б…
Жамоат ҳимоячиси: қонунда йўқ шарт қаердан пайдо бўлди?
"Эзгулик" жамияти вакилининг судда жамоат ҳимоячиси сифатида қатнашишига рад жавоби берилибди. Расмий изоҳда бу судланувчи мазкур ташкилотга аъзо эмаслиги билан тушунтирилган.
Лекин ЖПКнинг 42-моддасида "фақат ўз аъзосини ҳимоя қилиши мумкин" деган шарт йўқ. Унда жамоат бирлашмалари судга жамоат ҳимоячиси сифатида ўз вакилларини юбориши мумкинлиги, вакилни йиғ…
Дўлана терган ҳар бир инсон ҳуқуқбузарми?
Хатирчида рухсатномасиз дўлана терган икки фуқарога жами қарийб 7,5 миллион сўм жарима белгиланибди. Яна бир миллион сўмдан ортиқ табиатга зарар ҳисобланибди.
Табиатни асраш керак, албатта. Лекин фуқарони жаримага тортиш учун дўлана терганини эмас, қайси қоидани бузганини ҳам кўрсатиш керак.
"Ўсимлик дунёсини муҳофаза қилиш ва ундан фойдаланиш тўғрисида"ги Қонуннинг 30-мод…
Мурожаат ортидан фуқаро эмас, тизим юрсин!
Анча олдинроқ бир иш билан Истанбулда бўлганимизда зарурият туфайли бир ташкилотга мурожаат қилдик. Мурожаатимиз бўйича жавоб тайёрланганида телефонимизга СМС келди. Бир неча кундан кейин яна хабар олдик, ҳужжат фалон почта бўлимига топширилган. Биз ўша почтага бориб, жавобни ортиқча оворагарчиликсиз олдик.
Оддий бир СМС. Аммо у инсоннинг қанча вақтини, асабини ва йўл хара…
Фикрга қўшилмаслик мумкин. Қонунга риоя қилмаслик-чи?
Терговчининг тақиқ қўйиш ҳақидаги хати ва Кадастр агентлигининг муносабати юзасидан билдирган фикрларимизга қўшилмаганлар ҳам бор.
Бу табиий. Ҳуқуқий баҳсда ҳар ким ўз позициясига эга бўлиши мумкин. Аммо позициянинг кучини унинг қатъий айтилгани эмас, ҳуқуқий асоси белгилайди.
Масаланинг кейинги босқичи ҳам бор. Иш судга юборилганда ушбу тақиқнинг тақдири қанда…
Бир марта, икки марта... Порага ўрганган кўз кейин далилдан ҳам "мой" қидира бошлайди. Пулсиз келганнинг дарди эшитилмайди, ҳақ гапи ҳам ўтмайди. Шу тариқа кўзни мой, қалбни занг босади.
Хат билан тақиқ, қонун билан изоҳми?
"Халқ назорати" кўтарган масала ва Кадастр агентлигининг муносабатини ўқиб, жавоб кутаётган саволимиз аниқ.
2026 йил 28 апрелдаги ушбу хатда муайян хонадоннинг олди-сотдисига тақиқ қўйиш сўралган. Сабаб "зарурат туғилганлиги" ва дастлабки тергов муддати чегараланганлиги. Хатда суд ажримини ёки мол-мулкни хатлаш тўғрисидаги қарорни ижро этиш сўралмаган. Тақиқ қўйишнинг ўзи сўралг…
Тадбиркор кўпми ёки текширувга иштаҳа каттами?
Бизнес-омбудсман Абдуманноп Буриевнинг маълум қилишича, баъзи ҳудудларда ҳар 11–13 тадбиркордан биттаси текширилса, айрим шаҳар ва туманларда ҳар икки ёки уч тадбиркордан бири текширувга дуч келмоқда.
Қонун бир, мамлакат бир. Унда нега тадбиркорнинг текширувга тушиш эҳтимоли манзилига қараб бунчалик фарқ қилади? Ўша ҳудудларда қонунбузарлик кўпми ёки текширувга иштаҳа …
💯17🤬10❤6👍5🥴2
Showing the 12 most recent of 145 posts we hold for @Advokat_Abdullayev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 25 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 22 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Advokat_Abdullayev named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@advocaab named in 7 posts, 12 August 2026 – 23 August 2026 · confirmed gone 29 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@advokat named in 3 posts, 27 August 2026 – 2 September 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Advokat Abdullayev | Rasmiy” (@Advokat_Abdullayev), 28,950 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Advokat_Abdullayev.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.