پیمان مکه یا با ایران، یا بر علیه ایران! قیمت نفت،در این مقطع گزینه دوم را نشان میدهد... @Adolf_Media
🔥294❤48👍39🤯36😢4

Channel
@Adolf_media
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Cite this entry
24,949subscribers
+580 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002177970023 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Adolf_media |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 47 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Adolf_media |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
18,500 average views per post against 24,949 subscribers — an engagement rate of 74.1%. Across the 2,198 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,342–31,618 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 2.65% and 13.4%, with a median of 6.36%.
| Window | 30 days (28 September 2026 – 28 October 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 73 of 73 published in the window (0 exact, 73 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 1,350,200 |
| Mature posts only | 74.1% over 73 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 24,949 measured 28 October 2026 |
| Cohort | b10000:fas · 2,198 channels · p10 1.02% · p25 2.65% · p50 6.36% · p75 13.4% · p90 23.5% |
| Position in cohort | 99.044th percentile · 11.7× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.117% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Persian · 100.0% of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 29 October 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Oct 2026, 06:25 | 24,949 | +2 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 06:55 | 24,947 | -5 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 04:17 | 24,952 | +3 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 01:20 | 24,949 | +62 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 23:59 | 24,887 | +120 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 02:49 | 24,767 | +111 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 02:18 | 24,656 | +20 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 19:59 | 24,636 | +10 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 21:36 | 24,626 | +9 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 00:16 | 24,617 | +19 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 21:08 | 24,598 | +15 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 00:26 | 24,583 | +83 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 03:31 | 24,500 | -6 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 21:59 | 24,506 | -4 |
| 10 Oct 2026, 16:35 | 24,510 | +57 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 16:54 | 24,453 | -26 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 16:02 | 24,479 | +62 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 11:16 | 24,417 | +2 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 06:17 | 24,415 | +5 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 12:19 | 24,410 | first reading |
166 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 112 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 166 (31 July 2026 – 26 October 2026) |
| Views total | 1,350,200 |
| Reactions total | 30,971 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Oct 2026, 01:29 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
69,490 reactions across 166 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 28,172 | 40.5% | |
| 👍 | 19,895 | 28.6% | |
| 🤯 | 9,304 | 13.4% | |
| 😢 | 8,217 | 11.8% | |
| 🔥 | 3,902 | 5.62% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 166 of the 166 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 69,490 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 166 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 26 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Adolf_media. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 166 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 26 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
پیمان مکه یا با ایران، یا بر علیه ایران! قیمت نفت،در این مقطع گزینه دوم را نشان میدهد... @Adolf_Media
🔥294❤48👍39🤯36😢4
فعلا واکنش بازار را در حد خبردرمانی میبینم، نه بیشتر و نه کمتر. @Adolf_Media
❤230👍54🔥15😢4
در مورد حضور ایران در پیمان مکه صحبتی کرده بودم. اما لازمه رسیدن به توافق اصلی، یکدستسازی در راس تصمیمگیران حکومت است. این عمل میتواند با یک موج دیگر جنگ/ترور یا شبهکودتا انجام شود. @Adolf_Media
❤225👍58🤯21🔥14😢3
گزارش CNN: مقامهای اسرائیلی تلاش کردند در آخر هفته گذشته حملهای علیه ایران انجام دهند، اما آمریکا با این اقدام مخالفت کرد. بااینحال، دو طرف درباره اجرای عملیات مشترک در زمان دیگری گفتوگو میکنند - عرض کردم مجدد حملهای برنامهریزی شده بود. @Adolf_Media
❤218👍64😢23🔥12🤯3
🚨| #اختصاصی گزارش چند منبع ما از استانهای مختلف نشان میدهد به برخی مشمولان اعزامی اعلام شده که تا صبح سهشنبه به پادگان آموزشی مراجعه نکند و برای این فاصله غیبت ثبت نشود! این گزارش در حالی منتشر میشود که برخی منابع از احتمال تنش و اقدامات احتیاطی در برخی مراکز خبر میدهند. از نظر تحلیلی، چنین تأخیرهایی میتواند با خالیسازی یا کاهش ظرفیت موقت برخی مراکز، اولویتهای امنیتی یا جابهجایی نیروها مرتبط باشد. @Adolf_Med…
❤252👍65🤯23🔥5
نگاهها به آرامش در جبهه روسیه و اوکراین باشد که ارتباط مستقیمی با ورود آمریکا به جنگ با ایران دارد. طبق گزارشات غیررسمی، تاریخ آتشبس در این جبهه 29 اکتبر خواهد بود! @Adolf_Media
🔥234👍58❤47😢9
بازم خداروشکر که ما در این ایام چنین محتوایی منتشر کردیم وگرنه عدهای بدون منبع میماندند! پن: «طهلیلگر» صداسیمایی، بعد از کپی کردن محتوای رسانه؛ در حال ضبط ویدیوی ۴ هواپیمای مهم ... @Adolf_Media
🔥325👍93❤45🤯11😢1
دستور حمله صادر شده! جنگ در این هفته رخ خواهد داد؛ مگر آنکه مانند ۴ حملهی قبلی، در لحظات آخر کنسل شود. که در این مورد حقیقتا اطلاعی نداریم. در واقع هیچکس اطلاعی ندارد... @Adolf_Media
😢414❤106👍60🔥59🤯14
🕊 @Adolf_Media
😢151❤52🔥19👍16
به اندازه کافی خبر پرتنش شنیدید این دو روز. استراحت کنید و از اخبار به دور باشید. حالا باید منتظر ماند. در حال حاضر کاری از دست شما بر نخواهد آمد پس حرص نخورید. @Adolf_Media
❤327👍75😢27🔥14
ترامپ از طریق میانجیها به گوش مقامات ارشد جمهوری اسلامی رسونده که در صورت عدم توافق، به زیرساختهای انرژی حمله خواهد کرد. - هدف، ایجاد شکاف نهایی بین مردم و حاکمیت است. قطعا اگر حملات موفقیتآمیز و طبق برنامه باشد، در مناطقی آشوب و درگیری داخلی خواهیم داشت. این نکته را در نظر داشته باشید که زیرساختهای انرژی ایران متمرکز نیست. @Adolf_Media
❤284👍76😢32🤯22🔥12
📈هر بار که لاکهید مارتین در حالی که بازار کلی افت میکند سبز میشود، بهتر است به سیگنالهای تنش ژئوپلیتیکی توجه کنیم. این حرکت میتواند نشانه افزایش انتظار برای سفارشهای دفاعی و بالا رفتن ریسک امنیتی باشد. نمونه؟ - درگیری اسرائیل و ایران (جنگ ۱۲ روزه): سهام لاکهید مارتین در روزی که شاخص S&P 500 حدود ۱.۱٪ افت کرد، ۳.۵٪ رشد کرد. دلیل مستقیم آن، حمله اسرائیل به ایران و گمانهزنی درباره افزایش سفارشهای تسلیحاتی بود. …
❤229👍49😢23🔥21
Showing the 12 most recent of 166 posts we hold for @Adolf_media. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
@Adolf_media edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“رسانه آدولف” (@Adolf_media), 24,949 subscribers as measured 28 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Adolf_media.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.