Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Dizayn.Uz

Channel

Dizayn.Uz

@Adobe_photoshop_bepul_darslar

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,875subscribers

-42 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001456365766
TypeChannel
Username@Adobe_photoshop_bepul_darslar
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Adobe_photoshop_bepul_darslar

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,8751,9211,8987 August 2026 — 1,917 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,921 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,918 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,913 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,915 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,918 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,910 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,905 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,904 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,898 subscribers5 September 2026 — 1,892 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,886 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,883 subscribers19 September 2026 — 1,875 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 44 days, net -42. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,868–1,928 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 16:221,875-8
14 Sept 2026, 18:401,883-3
11 Sept 2026, 00:581,886-6
5 Sept 2026, 17:381,892-6
1 Sept 2026, 18:281,898-6
29 Aug 2026, 21:271,904-1
26 Aug 2026, 21:231,905-5
24 Aug 2026, 06:131,910-8
20 Aug 2026, 12:091,918+3
17 Aug 2026, 17:051,915+2
14 Aug 2026, 10:151,913-5
10 Aug 2026, 20:271,918-3
7 Aug 2026, 21:221,921+4
7 Aug 2026, 00:461,917first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 16s
Average length
1m 08s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

60 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥3558.3%
❤1525.0%
👍46.67%
😭35.00%
⚡11.67%
🎃11.67%
🕊11.67%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 60 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 December 2025 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
100
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
100
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Adobe_photoshop_bepul_darslar. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 December 2025 to 1 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 19:23 UTC256 viewsread 7 August 2026

#Telegram Nakrutka Xizmati 🕊 👥| 1k - 15 ming som 💸 👥| 5k - 75 ming som 💸 👥| 10k - 150 ming som 💸 #Instagram Nakrutka Xizmati 📱 👥| 1K - 25ming som 🔥 👥| 5K - 125ming som 🔥 👥| 10K - 250ming som 🔥 Reaksiya,har xil xizmatlar bor. Bundan tashqari qoʻshimcha, 100-ming investitsiya orqali nakrutka saytidan har 6-daqiqada pul ishlash imkoniyati ham bor. Ishlangan puldan, Sayt balansiga chiqarasiz va foydangizdan zakaz…

21 Apr 2026, 20:02 UTC≈1,560 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Hamma bilishi kerak bo’lgan 3 ta AI 1. Chatgpt To’g’ri savol bilan istalgan sohada va shaxsiy hayotda o’sishingizga yordam beradi 2. Nano banana Siz middle darajasidagi dizaynlar qilolasiz va bu istalgan inson uchun kerak 3. Veo 3.1 Shahsiy blogingiz uchun video roliklar tayyorlaydi Yanada foydali ma’lumotlar uchun sahifamizga obuna bo’ling 👇 https://t.me/Adobe_photoshop_bepul_darslar

❤6

9 Apr 2026, 18:11 UTC≈1,340 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Assalomu Aleykum Hurmatli kanalimiz aʼzolari,bizga sodiq qolgan holatda kanalimizda qolganingiz uchun rahmat! Kimda qanday yangiliklar? Kanalda qanday darslarni koʻrib borishni xohlaysiz? Sunʼiy Intellekt boʻyicha qanday saytlar va nimalar qiziq yozib qoldiring albatta siz uchun foydali maʼlumotlar va video darslarni qoʻyib boramiz.

🔥1

18 Jan 2026, 23:11 UTC≈2,520 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

AI bilan dizaynerlar ko‘proq pul topyapti. Nega? Oldin: — 1 dizayn = 3 soat — 1 kunda 2 ish Hozir: — 1 dizayn = 20 daqiqa — 1 kunda 10 ish Farq nimada? 👉 Sun’iy intellektdan foydalanishda. Kim tez ishlasa — kim ko‘p topshirsa — kim zamonaviy bo‘lsa — o‘sha yutadi. 📈 Dizayn + AI = daromad 📌 Obuna bo‘l, real tajribalar bilan bo‘lishaman.

❤5

18 Jan 2026, 16:31 UTC≈1,890 viewsread 7 August 2026

🎨 Dizaynerlar uchun ajoyib yangilik! Photoshopni o‘rgandingiz, zo‘r ishlar qilyapsiz... Lekin mijozga ishlaringizni haliyam Telegram papka yoki arxiv (zip) qilib yuboryapsizmi? 📂 Bu eskirgan usul! Zamonaviy mijozlar "silka" (link) ko‘rishni xohlaydi. Bizning do‘stlarimiz — Portfoliya.uz platformasi aynan dizaynerlar uchun maxsus sovg‘a tayyorlashdi. 🎁 Kanalimiz obunachilari uchun EKSKLYUZIV: Biz sizlar uchun 50 …

18 Jan 2026, 16:31 UTC≈1,360 viewsread 7 August 2026

Assalomu Aleykum Grafik Dizaynerlar siz uchun maxsus taklif olib keldim tez orada eʼlon qilamiz

17 Jan 2026, 10:29 UTC≈1,420 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Bugun dizayner bilishi shart bo‘lgan 3 ta AI tool 1️⃣ Midjourney — vizual fantaziya 2️⃣ Photoshop AI — vaqtni tejaydi 3️⃣ ChatGPT — kontseptsiya va matnlar Bularni bilmagan dizayner — 📉 sekin 📉 arzon 📉 raqobatga yaroqsiz Biladigan dizayner esa — 🔥 📌 Shu ro‘yxatni saqlab qo‘y, kerak bo‘ladi. 🔔 Obuna bo‘lsang, har kuni foydali AI sirlar beraman.

🔥2👍1

14 Jan 2026, 23:37 UTC≈1,340 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Grafik dizaynerlar yo‘q bo‘lib ketadimi? Sun’iy intellekt rasmlarni 5 soniyada chizmoqda. Logotip, banner, post — hammasini. Lekin haqiqat bitta: ❌ Dizaynerlar yo‘q bo‘lmaydi ✅ Faqat oddiy dizaynerlar yo‘qoladi AI — bu raqib emas, bu kuchaytirgich. Agar dizayner AI’dan foydalansa — u 10 baravar tezroq, 3 baravar qimmatroq ishlaydi. 👉 Agar kelajak dizayneri bo‘lishni xohlasang — obuna bo‘l

😭3❤2

7 Jan 2026, 23:29 UTC≈1,390 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

Juda katta loyihamizni boshlab oldik ishimizga baho bering hali bu loyiha bo’yicha ko’p ishlarimni tashlab boraman Video sun’iy intellektda tayyorlangan Buyurtma uchun @natija_kurs

6 Jan 2026, 17:14 UTC≈1,190 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Bilim — qo‘lda turgan qurolga o‘xshaydi. Uni ishlatmasang, u ham temir bo‘lib qoladi. O‘qiganing, o‘rganganing amalda qo‘llanmasa, u bilim emas — shunchaki xotira. Insonni oldinga olib chiqadigan narsa bilganlari emas, balki bilganini qilganidir.

👍2🔥1

4 Jan 2026, 16:27 UTC≈1,300 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Dars uchun kerakli saytlar va materiallar! 1.https://chatgpt.com/ 2.https://grok.com/ 3.https://temp-mail.org/ 4.Cap Cut videolarni birlashtirish va montaj qilish uchun.

🔥2

4 Jan 2026, 16:25 UTC≈1,140 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/VTmcyFirQSE Kutib oling,siz kutgan dars. 21:30da Youtube kanalimizda ko'rib o'rganishingiz mumkin.

🔥2🕊1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Adobe_photoshop_bepul_darslar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Dizayn.Uz” (@Adobe_photoshop_bepul_darslar), 1,875 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Adobe_photoshop_bepul_darslar.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.