2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 133–135 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 00:22
134
no change
10 Nov 2026, 23:47
134
first reading
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 30 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4044.8%
avg views ÷ 134 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,420
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.959%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 8 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held
8 (30 May 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total
5,420
Reactions total
52
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 00:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
5
Videos
1
Links
3
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1h 55m
Average length
1h 55m
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
216 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5312496454885980247
90
41.7%
custom 5224375279434097886
57
26.4%
custom 5420557625894916233
47
21.8%
custom 5219829335724147618
22
10.2%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 216 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 1 post held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
ЖУРНАЛ «ИГРОМАНИЯ» × ОСОБОВ, HybR1dTheory, AdmLangley
Наша пати официально стала топ-1 в Линейдже, получила всемирное признание и священное бремя – двигать игру в широкие массы.
Мы дали легендарному журналу жёсткое и бесцензурное интервью, пояснили за термины откачки и опроса, раскидали за все ваши любимые паки, разобрали текущую мету дейли пвп и раскрыли секрет, как и почему мы откачиваем все турниры уже который г…
Обнаружен первый фанат в игре, видимо, после смены на новом заводе нужно будет таки засесть за фрапс с турика и дорегать остальные учётки в соцсетях для нашей пачки, дабы уже в промышленных масштабах фармить хайп с охватов из органики за счёт большого количества фрапсов нашей девятки
Запомните, братцы, два простых правила медийки:
- на одну единицу контента можно сгенерировать еще десяток-другой и откачать количест…
😈 ПОДКАСТ С ЧЕМПИОНАМИ МИРА ПО GVG 9x9 — OSOBOV OPASEN
Один раз когда я спросил "почему ОСОБОВ ОПАСЕН?", где-то на секунд 30 в дискорде 9 человек словили тишину, после чего кто-то сказал что такие вопросы вслух не задают.
(с) — Иван «west1k» Волков
Корпорация, основа, движ:
😈 ПАБЛИК ОСОБОВ
😈 ПАБЛИК HybR1dTheory
😓 ПАБЛИК AdmLangley
Таймкоды:
00:05 - Кто такие ОСОБОВ?
03:03 - Как и когда собрался ваш коллектив?
05:3…
Сказать что я ахуел — ничего не сказать. Еще месяц назад бегал с этим ником угорал с пацанами и слушал по 100 раз в день «раскол вставай, перезалетаем», а сегодня сам раскол записывает этот кружок.
страха:реально:нет, позитивное мышление работает, вся хуйня 😁
🤴🏆 РАССЧИТАЙТЕ КОРОЛЯ: ТУРИК НА $10 000 СНОВА ЗАБРАЛ @OSOBOV OPASEN
Вот мы с пацанами в четвёртый раз забираем очередной фришный турик.
Заодно испортили праздник хейтерам, которые до последнего надеялись, что наш топ стак не придёт. Как говорится, недолго музыка играла, анлак хуле.
- Только Гибрид может импруваться на турнирах и менять не 12, а уже 13 таргетов в секунду
(с) Александр "Nix" Левин
Общий призовой ф…
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @AdmLangley. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“линия жизни два” (@AdmLangley), 134 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AdmLangley.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
