Channel
@AcryptSpace
On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry
5,813subscribers
-33 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 3,162โ10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001552614937 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AcryptSpace |
| Description | Top marketing Agency with more than 500+ Kols ( @AcryptMarketing an Agency that helps early Stage projects with any kind of Marketing! ) DM us for Collab or Marketing @AbrarLegit |
| Created | Between 1 July 2021 and 31 January 2023โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AcryptSpace |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:46 | 5,813 | -33 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:46 | 5,846 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:35 | 5,846 | first reading |
23 posts held, back to 22 May 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 23 (22 May 2026 โ 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 28,490 |
| Reactions total | โ |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 03:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramโs own channel header, read 12 August 2026 โ not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
Nvidiaโs reported $3B move into Lancium shows where the next battleground is being fought. Selling chips is step one; securing gigawatts of grid capacity to actually run them is step two. If energy becomes the ultimate bottleneck, clean power infrastructure companies could be the biggest winners of the next AI expansion cycle. ๐๐ Is AI power & infrastructure the biggest investment theme for the rest of the decade? โฆ
In crypto, promises are cheap. Code, reserves, and security track records are everything. ๐ก๏ธ WEEX just released its official security proof points, and the numbers speak for themselves: โข 1,000 BTC Protection Fund (On-chain) โข 1:1 Reserves on ALL assets โข 8 Years with 0 security breaches โข 10M+ users & 1 in 6 crypto KOLs Here is why smart capital is choosing WEEX https://weex.com/register?vipCode=qpk0
File, posted without a caption
WEEX @WEEX_Official just opened beta access to their new AI Trading feature Chat with AI, place trades directly, no charts needed. They'll demo it live at #CoinfestAsia (Aug 20-21). RT this post + swing by Ocean Suite, Room 2 to try it in person ๐ค #WEEX #AITrading
๐ผ๐๐ง๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ฉ ๐๐ฅ๐๐๐ pinned a photo
๐ $MEPR AIRDROP: 50,000 tokens. Zero speculation, all utility. Metta Protocol runs on fee-generating infrastructure - payments, escrow, AI APIs, digital identity, RWA - not hype. ๐ Duration: July 31 โ August 15 ๐ฐ Prize pool: 50,000 $MEPR Details ๐ https://sweepwidget.com/c/101317-jwa42f8x Subscribe to: Telegram โ๏ธ| X ๐๏ธ
๐ WEEX Welcome Bonus ๐ July 15 โ August 15 23:59 (UTC+0) ๐ Invite friends to register & trade to earn 40 USDT! ๐ Register: โ Deposit over 100 USDT and hold for 3 days get 20U bonus โ First future trading over 1,000 USDT get 20U bonus ๐ฃ Friend can join: https://weex.com/register?vipCode=qpk0
๐จ REMINDER: WEEX GOGOGO Ep.5 goes LIVE tomorrow, 19:00 (UTC+8)! โ Set your reminder โ Claim early bird rewards โ Show up & win big ๐บ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=07AYAcx-Mqk Get a sneak peek ๐ https://bit.ly/4yObzik Trade smarter. Move faster. ๐ฅ #WEEX #WEEXGOGOGO #cryptotrading #airdrop
๐ WEEX Welcome Bonus ๐ Jul. 29 โAug. 20 23:59 (UTC+0) ๐ Invite friends to register & trade to earn 100 USDT! โ Complete one trade over 1,000 USDT โ Deposit over 100 USDT get 10 USDT โ Deposit over 500 USDT get 30 USDT โ Deposit over 1,000 USDT get 70 USDT โ Deposit over 1,500 USDT get 100 USDT bonus can be use when users account has sufficient assets ๐ฃ Friend can join: https://www.weex.com/en/register?vipCode=qpk0
Fear & Greed is back at 29. Markets are nervous. BTC is holding above $63K. The Fed is next. This breakdown from @WEEX_Official covers the levels and scenarios I'm watching this week. ๐ https://bit.ly/4pOSAAf https://www.weex.com/en/register?vipCode=qpk0 #Bitcoin #BTC #CryptoMarket #WEEX
๐ 8 Years of secure ops. 10M users. An on-chain verifiable protection fund. WEEX laid out their whole security case here โ genuinely more transparent than I expected ๐ https://bit.ly/4ho9R0O https://www.weex.com/en/register?vipCode=qpk0 #WEEX #CryptoSecurity
Everyone's suddenly paying attention to the CLARITY Act again Honestly it's warranted ๐ Senate vote timeline is the thing to watch, could be crypto's next big catalyst Quick breakdown here: https://bit.ly/3TeJznO https://www.weex.com/en/register?vipCode=qpk0 #ClarityAct #WEEX #BTC #ETH
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @AcryptSpace. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank โ 568,745 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐ผ๐๐ง๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ฉ ๐๐ฅ๐๐๐โ (@AcryptSpace), 5,813 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AcryptSpace.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.