Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

[CPP 27 ]

@Acdh_cpp1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,875subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001333678282
TypeChannel
Username@Acdh_cpp1
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Acdh_cpp1

Growth

1,87512 Aug 2026, 10:04 — 1,875 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 10:15 — 1,875 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 10:0412 Aug 2026, 10:15
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,873–1,877 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 10:151,875no change
12 Aug 2026, 10:041,875first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 March 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
34
Videos
32
Links
33

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
16m 03s
Average length
5m 21s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

164 reactions across 16 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
15091.5%
👍127.32%
👎21.22%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 164reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 March 2025 to 15 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Nov 2025, 18:50 UTC≈3,510 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

ملف اتمنى يفيدكم ( حطيت اشياء تساعدكم عشان ماتشتتوا كثيير) واذا كتب الله لي عمر، باذن الله على خيير بنزل لكم شروحات حسب قدرتي - للقواعد - والمفردات والمصادر المجانيه كثيير اهم شيء استمروا وطوروا لغتكم واذا الملف ماعجبك هالرسالة موجودة: https://t.me/Acdh_cpp1/195

12👍2

15 Nov 2025, 18:50 UTC≈2,630 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته

2

21 Sept 2025, 18:26 UTC≈2,970 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

وهل الفيديوهات القصيره الي ارسلها مفيده لكم؟ مثل الالغاز ترتيب الوقت

  1. ايه مفيده55%
  2. لا مو مفيده7%
  3. مفيده وكثر منها10%
  4. بشوف التصويت28%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2

21 Sept 2025, 18:26 UTC≈2,470 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026

باذن الله قريب سيتم ترتيب القناة بشكل افضل واعتذر منكم على الحوسه اتمنى نشرها عشان الفايده

6

16 Sept 2025, 15:46 UTC≈2,610 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

لا تتشتوا بالتطبيقات ثنين يكفوا ان شاء الله اخر فتره انا صاير اسوي كذا صحيح مو منتظم بس جد ساعدني هذا المقاطع لان فيه اشخاص قالوا كيف نوازن بين الاختبارات الحل هذا انكم ترتبوا كل شيء في ك مهام

5

16 Sept 2025, 15:46 UTC≈2,170 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

هنا التخطيط اليومي واعتذر عن الاطالة بس هذي تجربتي وبتختصر عليكم كثيير باذن الله

3

16 Sept 2025, 14:53 UTC≈1,970 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته ،مقطع عالسريع ممكن يفيدكم لتخطيط( ترتيب المهام والافكار) التطبيق اسمه:او تفتحه ك موقع باللابتوب Google Calendar

3

27 Mar 2025, 19:35 UTC≈6,320 views45 reactionsread 12 August 2026

الله يوفقكم جميعاً وييسر لكم كل خيير واعتذر منكم اذا قصرت في الردود بسبب الظروف واتمنى اني افدكم كل شيء باذن الله يوجد بالمثبته طلاب ثاني واولى ابدوا باللغه الانجليزيه وابدعوا باللغه ( ثم الرياضيات لا تتعقموا وتقولون بنصيير واو خلوكم مناهج وتجميعات والي بالقروب كتبته لكم ) وطلاب ثالث ربي ييسر لكم الاختبار وتوكلوا على الله سلام عليكم في حفظ الرحمن جميعاً

44👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Acdh_cpp1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

21 Sept 2025, 18:26 UTCAnonymous Poll206 voters

وهل الفيديوهات القصيره الي ارسلها مفيده لكم؟ مثل الالغاز ترتيب الوقت

  1. ايه مفيده55%
  2. لا مو مفيده7%
  3. مفيده وكثر منها10%
  4. بشوف التصويت28%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Mar 2025, 15:23 UTCAnonymous Poll1,020 voters approx.

حطيت الرساله صامته عشان لا ازعجكم

  1. انا اولى ثانوي3%
  2. انا ثاني ثانوي13%
  3. انا ثالث ثانوي73%
  4. متخرج11%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9 Mar 2025, 11:20 UTCAnonymous Poll142 voters

ان شاء الله فهمتوا مقصدي

  1. ايه وببدا ان شاء الله60%
  2. لا بس بحاول اشوف حسابات الاستاذ تركي ( والخريطه للاسئلة الشائعه) وابدا40%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 March 2025 to 15 November 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 340,792 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“[CPP 27 ]” (@Acdh_cpp1), 1,875 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Acdh_cpp1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.