Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

✞ᎪᴄᴀᴆᥱᴍᎩ ▸ ‹‹ 𝐑ᴇɴᴀɪssᴀɴᴄᴇ ››

@Academy_Renaissance

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

33subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004325872238
TypeChannel
Username@Academy_Renaissance
Description- 🫧 ↲◖𝗥𝗼𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗼𝘃 𝗚𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱◗↳ ☘ - • ─ — ─ — ─ — ─ ⊹ ─ — ─ — ─ — ─ • ↷ 𝖠𝘥𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦 𝗂𝘯 𝗍𝘩𝘦 𝖱𝘰𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘰𝘷 𝖦𝘶𝘪𝘭𝘥 ↶ 🏮 - 𝕽𝘰𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘰𝘷 𝕲𝘶𝘪𝘭𝘥 ↬ @Romanov_Guild » 📚 - 𝕽𝘰𝘮𝘢𝘯𝘰𝘷 𝕴𝘯𝘧𝘰 ↬ @Romanov_Information »
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 20 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Academy_Renaissance

Growth

339 Aug 2026, 15:15 — 33 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 01:46 — 33 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 15:1511 Aug 2026, 01:46
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32–34 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 01:4633no change
9 Aug 2026, 15:1533first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
162.6%
avg views ÷ 33 subscribers
Avg views / post
53.6
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 July 2026
Posts held14 (20 July 202620 July 2026)
Views total751
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 01:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
115

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

20 Jul 2026, 09:33 UTC88 views0 reactionsread 11 August 2026

[⚔️ - #𝙁𝙤𝙧𝙢𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣_𝙎𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 - ] ↳ ⦏🛡⦐ ◃ ◃ ‹ 𝙄𝙣𝙩𝙧𝙤𝙙𝙪𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 & 𝙎𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙘𝙩𝙪𝙧𝙚 › ▬ آرایش شیلترون یک ساختار دفاعی متراکم از نیزه داران پیاده بود که برای مقابله با حملات سواره نظام طراحی شده بود . در این آرایش ، سربازان به شکل یک دایره یا مربع فشرده کنار یکدیگر قرار میگرفتند و نیزه های بلند خود را به سمت بیرون نگه میداشتند . مرکز آرایش معمولا از فرماندهان ، پرچم ها یا نیروهای آسیب پذیر محافظت میشد . تراکم بالای سربازان و تعداد زیا

Signed ⚘Ꮋᥲꪀɪ𐌁ᥲʟ

20 Jul 2026, 09:30 UTC87 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed ⚘Ꮋᥲꪀɪ𐌁ᥲʟ

20 Jul 2026, 09:29 UTC86 viewsread 11 August 2026

[⚔️ - #𝙁𝙤𝙧𝙢𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣_𝙎𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 - ] ↳ ⦏🛡⦐ ◃ ◃ ‹ 𝙄𝙣𝙩𝙧𝙤𝙙𝙪𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 & 𝙎𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙘𝙩𝙪𝙧𝙚 › ▬ آرایش مکعب رومی یک ساختار دفاعی بسته بود که در آن سربازان لژیونر به شکل یک چهارضلعی منظم در کنار یکدیگر قرار میگرفتند . در این آرایش ، نیروها در تمام جهات دارای صفوف دفاعی بودند و هر ضلع مکعب مانند یک دیوار سپری عمل میکرد . لژیونرها با استفاده از سپرهای بزرگ Scutum ، زره های لوریكا و سلاح های خود ، یک واحد متحرک و مقاوم ایجاد میکردند . این ساختار

Signed ⚘Ꮋᥲꪀɪ𐌁ᥲʟ

20 Jul 2026, 09:29 UTC72 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed ⚘Ꮋᥲꪀɪ𐌁ᥲʟ

20 Jul 2026, 09:28 UTC69 viewsread 11 August 2026

[⚔️ - #𝙁𝙤𝙧𝙢𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣_𝙎𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 - ] ↳ ⦏🛡⦐ ◃ ◃ ‹ 𝙄𝙣𝙩𝙧𝙤𝙙𝙪𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 & 𝙎𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙘𝙩𝙪𝙧𝙚 › ▬ شیلدوال یا دیوار سپری یکی از مشهورترین آرایش های دفاعی پیاده نظام در تاریخ اروپا بود که توسط وایکینگ ها ، آنگلوساکسون ها و برخی اقوام ژرمن استفاده میشد . در این آرایش ، سربازان در چند ردیف نزدیک به یکدیگر قرار میگرفتند و سپرهای خود را کنار هم قرار میدادند تا یک دیوار محافظتی یکپارچه ایجاد کنند . جنگجویان خط اول معمولا سپرهای خود را روی هم قرار مید

Signed ⚘Ꮋᥲꪀɪ𐌁ᥲʟ

20 Jul 2026, 09:27 UTC51 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed ⚘Ꮋᥲꪀɪ𐌁ᥲʟ

20 Jul 2026, 09:24 UTC45 viewsread 11 August 2026

[⚔️ - #𝙁𝙤𝙧𝙢𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣_𝙎𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 - ] ↳ ⦏🛡⦐ ◃ ◃ ‹ 𝙄𝙣𝙩𝙧𝙤𝙙𝙪𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 & 𝙎𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙘𝙩𝙪𝙧𝙚 › ▬ آرایش خارپشتی یک ساختار دفاعی متحرک بود که بر پایه قرار گرفتن سربازان سپردار در یک حلقه بسته طراحی شده بود . در این آرایش ، نیروها به شکل دایره یا توده کروی کنار یکدیگر قرار میگرفتند و سپرهای خود را در اطراف بدن برای ایجاد یک دیوار دفاعی قرار میدادند . نیزه داران درون این ساختار یا میان شکاف سپرها قرار گرفته و نیزه های خود را به سمت بیرون هدایت می

Signed ⚘Ꮋᥲꪀɪ𐌁ᥲʟ

20 Jul 2026, 09:23 UTC39 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed ⚘Ꮋᥲꪀɪ𐌁ᥲʟ

20 Jul 2026, 09:20 UTC38 viewsread 11 August 2026

[⚔️ - #𝙁𝙤𝙧𝙢𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣_𝙎𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 - ] ↳ ⦏🛡⦐ ◃ ◃ ‹ 𝙄𝙣𝙩𝙧𝙤𝙙𝙪𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 & 𝙎𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙘𝙩𝙪𝙧𝙚 › ▬ آرایش مربع رومی یک فرم دفاعی بسته در ارتش روم باستان بود که برای محافظت از نیروها در برابر حملات از چند جهت استفاده میشد . در این ساختار ، سربازان با قرار گرفتن در کنار یکدیگر و قرار دادن سپرهای بزرگ خود در اطراف ، یک دیواره دفاعی چندضلعی یا مربعی ایجاد میکردند . برخلاف آرایش Testudo که دارای پوشش بالایی بود ، این آرایش سقف سپری نداشت و تمرکز اصلی

Signed ⚘Ꮋᥲꪀɪ𐌁ᥲʟ

20 Jul 2026, 09:17 UTC31 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed ⚘Ꮋᥲꪀɪ𐌁ᥲʟ

20 Jul 2026, 09:12 UTC33 viewsread 11 August 2026

[⚔️ - #𝙁𝙤𝙧𝙢𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣_𝙎𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 - ] ↳ ⦏🛡⦐ ◃ ◃ ‹ 𝙄𝙣𝙩𝙧𝙤𝙙𝙪𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 & 𝙎𝙩𝙧𝙪𝙘𝙩𝙪𝙧𝙚 › ▬ فالانکس یکی از مشهورترین آرایش های نظامی جهان باستان بود که توسط یونانیان ، مخصوصا دولت شهر مقدونیه ، توسعه پیدا کرد . این آرایش بر پایه صفوف منظم پیاده نظام سنگین ساخته شده بود که سربازان در کنار یکدیگر قرار میگرفتند و با سپرهای خود یک دیوار دفاعی ایجاد میکردند . نیروهای اصلی این آرایش معمولا هوپلیت ها یا نیزه داران سنگین بودند که با نیزه های بلن

Signed ⚘Ꮋᥲꪀɪ𐌁ᥲʟ

20 Jul 2026, 09:12 UTC56 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed ⚘Ꮋᥲꪀɪ𐌁ᥲʟ

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @Academy_Renaissance. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,023,440 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“✞ᎪᴄᴀᴆᥱᴍᎩ ▸ ‹‹ 𝐑ᴇɴᴀɪssᴀɴᴄᴇ ››” (@Academy_Renaissance), 33 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Academy_Renaissance.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.