Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Абу Экс

@AbuXcom

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,334subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002352539604
TypeChannel
Username@AbuXcom
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/AbuXcom

Growth

1,3341,3351,334.57 August 2026 — 1,335 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,335 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,334 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,334–1,335 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 13:341,334-1
7 Aug 2026, 22:301,335no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:361,335first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7m 23s
Average length
40s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

341 reactions across 18 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥9828.7%
😁8424.6%
5716.7%
👍288.21%
🤡102.93%
👏92.64%
💔82.35%
👎72.05%
😱72.05%
🐳61.76%
🤮51.47%
🤝30.88%
🤩30.88%
💯20.587%
🙈20.587%
🤯20.587%
🥴20.587%
🎉10.293%
👀10.293%
👌10.293%
5 further kinds51.47%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 341reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2025 to 9 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Apr 2026, 16:42 UTC756 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

MMIWG2SLGBTQQIA+ Нет, это не пароль от wifi. Канадское правительство официально ввело новый акроним. Расшифровка: - MMIWG - Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls (пропавшие и убитые коренные женщины и девочки) - 2S - Two-Spirit (традиционная «двухдушная» идентичность в некоторых индейских культурах) - LGBTQQIA+ - весь привычный набор: лесбиянки, геи, бисексуалы, трансгендеры, квиры, квир-квиры, интерсекс

😁8👎2👀1

9 Apr 2026, 13:50 UTC738 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Астронавт Artemis II Рид Вайзман: Во время выхода в открытый космос я понял нечто важное: раньше я думал, что боюсь высоты, но теперь знаю, что просто боялся гравитации.

🔥135👍3😁2

9 Apr 2026, 13:22 UTC748 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Одно время. Две реальности.

10🤩2

8 Apr 2026, 06:02 UTC758 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Утренний трэш-ток от армянского премьера Никола Пашиняна: Боюсь, что к концу года Самвел Калужский (Карапетян) превратится из миллиардера в бомжа.

🤯1

8 Apr 2026, 05:06 UTC828 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Пакистан в последние 24 ч: Ок, кучка мазафакеров, несмотря на провокации, не деремся! Не воюем. Не воюем! Не воюем, бл*! Дальше смотрите сами😂

😁11👏2

7 Apr 2026, 19:15 UTC781 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Я не дам вам испортить мне мою войну. Говорят, она уничтожает слабых, но они и в мирное время пропадают. Только война кормит своих людей лучше. «Мамаша Кураж и ее дети»Бертольт Брехт

🔥10

7 Apr 2026, 17:46 UTC804 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

На этих кадрах вьетнамская семья беспомощно наблюдает, как американские солдаты поджигают их дом. Такие сцены были обычным делом во время тактики «Search and Destroy» («Найти и уничтожить»). Американские войска искали партизан Вьетконга и уничтожали целые деревни. Они сжигали дома, урожай и всё, что могло помочь врагу. Солдаты часто использовали напалм и зажигательные гранаты. Это происходило регулярно в 60-е и нача

💔8🤔1🤬1😢1😱1

7 Apr 2026, 15:10 UTC796 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Админ : приму чуть больше капель корвалола, чем обычно. Что может случиться? Также админ через 1,5 часа:

😁5👍21

7 Apr 2026, 13:56 UTCviews —

Абу Экс pinned «Трамп: целая цивилизация погибнет сегодня ночью. Какие варианты развития событий возможны. »

7 Apr 2026, 13:48 UTC819 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Трамп: целая цивилизация погибнет сегодня ночью. Какие варианты развития событий возможны.

  1. Полная капитуляция Ирана и сделка1%
  2. Частичное соглашение и де-эскалация6%
  3. Массированные удары по инфраструктуре Ирана26%
  4. Эскалация в полномасштабную региональную войну8%
  5. Ничего не изменится. Это блеф55%
  6. Смена власти в Иране, которая устроит США1%
  7. Свой ответ в комментариях2%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Apr 2026, 13:18 UTC821 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Самое время вернуться!

12🔥9😁6💯2🤝2🤨1🤯1

14 Jul 2025, 13:13 UTC≈4,330 views71 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Где найти весь альбом этой группы?

🔥41😁16🤮52🥴2🙈2💊1🤝1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @AbuXcom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Apr 2026, 13:48 UTCAnonymous Poll187 voters

Трамп: целая цивилизация погибнет сегодня ночью. Какие варианты развития событий возможны.

  1. Полная капитуляция Ирана и сделка1%
  2. Частичное соглашение и де-эскалация6%
  3. Массированные удары по инфраструктуре Ирана26%
  4. Эскалация в полномасштабную региональную войну8%
  5. Ничего не изменится. Это блеф55%
  6. Смена власти в Иране, которая устроит США1%
  7. Свой ответ в комментариях2%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2025 to 9 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 821,344 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Абу Экс” (@AbuXcom), 1,334 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AbuXcom.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.