Channel
@AboutAgeGap
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
244subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003626496578 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AboutAgeGap |
| Description | Feel free to comment. Ruang berdiskusi untuk kenyamanan bersama antar anak roleplay. Ch dimiliki oleh 2 orang aja. |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 26 December 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AboutAgeGap |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 14:00 | 244 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:48 | 244 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
179 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 89 | 49.7% | |
| 🔥 | 36 | 20.1% | |
| 🏆 | 24 | 13.4% | |
| 💯 | 21 | 11.7% | |
| 👌 | 6 | 3.35% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 1.68% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 179reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 December 2025 to 10 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Terimakasih kepada para roleplayer yang menyarankan channel ini sebagai informasi mengenai age gap. Jikalau ada kesalahan mengenai isi channel kami, mohon untuk selalu diberikan kritik dan saran dengan bahasa yang baik. ❤️ Anonymous bot selalu terbuka untuk para pembaca.
❤28🏆24👌2
Jika memang ingin merealisasikan pairing romantis antara minor dan legal, meskipun keduanya sama-sama consent, sebaiknya tidak dilakukan di ruang roleplay yang menggunakan wajah publik figur. Terlebih jika tetap ingin memaksakan pairing tersebut di dunia roleplay, karena bisa membuat situasinya menjadi lebih sensitif. Lalu muncul pertanyaan: jika sama-sama consent, apakah berarti pairing minor dan legal dengan age g…
💯21❤12
Banyak yang mengujarkan pendapat/opini kalau selama kedua pihak sama-sama consent, maka tidak masalah meskipun muse minor dan muse legal dipasangkan secara romantis. Namun, dalam konteks roleplay, yang menggunakan wajah idol atau figur publik, hal ini tidak sesederhana itu. Roleplay seperti ini tetap terhubung dengan dunia nyata, karena kita memakai wajah orang yang benar-benar ada dan dikenal publik. Oleh karena it…
❤12
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤1
Saya ucapkan lagi dan lagi. SAYA TIDAK PERNAH MEMAKSA KALIAN UNTUK MENGIKUTI. Ini hanyalah pendapat dari saya, dan pendapat dari kalian yang bisa kalian lontarkan di bot anon. Untuk apa menyerang saya di anon?
🔥13❤5
Saya dengar ada ch yang baru saja memposting mengenai age gap. Dan itu memakai peraturan yang lama, jujur saya agak bingung apalagi audiensnya cukup lebar tidak seperti saya, sudah lebih dari 400+ yang membaca. Saya ragu missleadingnya bukan malah mempersempit tapi meluas. Soalnya belum dihapus sama sekali.
Sebetulnya. Tidak sesusah itu untuk kalian menggunakan logika mengenai age gap seperti ini, tapi.. sudah cukup lama peraturan yang awal berjalan, dan terjadilah missleading. Hingga susah memberikan edukasi karena terdoktrin oleh peraturan lama.
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
Pertanyaan ini telah diizinkan oleh pengirimnya untuk diteruskan, sehingga saya izin menjawab. Roleplay memang bersifat kreatif, tetapi roleplay yang di sosial media platform tidak berada di ruang hampa. Kita berinteraksi sebagai individu nyata, menggunakan wajah idol atau figur publik yang nyata, sehingga tetap ada tanggung jawab etika dan batas aman yang perlu dijaga. Terkait minor x legal, masalahnya bukan pada …
❤9🔥9
Telah diizinkan dari sender untuk forward pertanyaan ini. Saya izin menjawab. Ada dua konteks dari pertanyaan ini: 1.) Muse korea yang legal *Berumur 19, apakah boleh di pairing langsung dengan yang sudah berumur 25? Kedua posisi ini legal. Usia 19 masih masuk fase new legal, di mana perbedaan pengalaman hidup dan kedewasaan emosional dengan usia 25+ sudah cukup terasa. Dalam RP, kondisi ini mudah menciptakan keti…
❤9🔥3🥰3
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @AboutAgeGap. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,411,179 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AGE GAPS.” (@AboutAgeGap), 244 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AboutAgeGap.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.