Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for وقف أبي هريرة لعلم الحديث ورجاله 🖋📚

Channel

وقف أبي هريرة لعلم الحديث ورجاله 🖋📚

@AbiHuraira

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,610subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001430944751
TypeChannel
Username@AbiHuraira
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/AbiHuraira

Growth

3,6043,6133,608.56 August 2026 — 3,608 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,608 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,607 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,604 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,613 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,610 subscribers3,6106 August 202616 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 10 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,603–3,614 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 19:243,610-3
13 Aug 2026, 09:033,613+9
10 Aug 2026, 14:123,604-3
7 Aug 2026, 05:513,607-1
6 Aug 2026, 14:203,608no change
6 Aug 2026, 14:193,608first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 12 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.2%
avg views ÷ 3,610 subscribers
Avg views / post
367
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.21%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held22 (12 June 20267 August 2026)
Views total2,572
Reactions total31
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 01s
Average length
1m 01s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

86 reactions across 17 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5058.1%
👍1719.8%
❤‍🔥910.5%
🔥44.65%
33.49%
💯22.33%
🤝11.16%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 86reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 18:44 UTC84 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @mahadasanaad

[ أهل الحديث أقرب الناس إلى الصواب ومذهب الحق ] : قال اللكنوي : "ومن نظر بنظر الإنصاف ، وغاص في بحار الفقه والأصول متجنباً الاعتساف ، يعلم علماً يقينياً أن أكثر المسائل الفرعية والأصلية التي اختلف العلماء فيها ، فمذهب المحدثين فيها أقوى من مذاهب غيرهم. وإني كلما أسير في شعب الاختلاف ، أجد قول المحدثين فيه قريباً من الإنصاف ، فلله درهم ، وعليه شكرهم ، كيف لا ، وهم ورثة النبي - صلى الله عليه وسلم - حقاً ، ونواب شرع

4

7 Aug 2026, 11:50 UTC149 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

أخرج مالكٌ في الموطأ وأبو داود والترمذي والنسائي بسندٍ صحيح من حديث يزيد بن عبدالله بن الهاد عن محمد بن إبراهيم التيمي عن أبي سلمة بن عبدالرحمن بن عوف عن أبي هريرة رضي الله عنه قال : قال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم : " خير يوم طلعت فيه الشمس : يوم الجمعة ؛ -فيه خلق آدم. -وفيه أهبط. -وفيه تيب عليه. -وفيه مات. -وفيه تقوم الساعة. -وما من دابة إلا وهي مسيخةٌ يوم الجمعة من حين تصبح حتى تطلع الشمس شفقاً من الساعة، إلا ا

3❤‍🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 07:04 UTC422 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

مسألة/ لماذا كثر مديح الأئمة وعلماء الأمة، لأهل الحديث؟ ج / لأنهم أكثر وأحرص متابعة لرسول الله صلى الله عليه وعلى آله وسلم. فيبنون اعتقادهم على ماثبت في النصّ.. ولا يخالفونه لرأي، ولا لتقليد الشيوخ، ولا يقدمون عقولهم عليه.. بل قد يخالف النص الثابت، مايبدو لهم، لكنهم ينقادون له، ويذعنون لما جاء عن الله بالوحي، {إن هو إلا وحي يوحىٰ}. وليس في فرق الأمة أكثر متابعة لأخبار الرسول صلى الله عليه وسلم، وأكثر تبعاً لسننه م

8

1 Aug 2026, 22:19 UTC352 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

( فائدة ): الحديث الوحيد الذي تفرد البخاري في صحيحه بتخريجه،دون غيره من المصنفين: قال البخاري في صحيحه (6587): "حدثنا إبراهيم بن المنذر الحزامي حدثنا محمد بن فُلَيح حدثنا أبي قال: حدثني هلال بن علي عن عطاء بن يسار عن أبي هريرة عن النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم قال: " بينا أنا نائم إذا زُمرة، حتى إذا عرفتهم خرج رجل من بيني وبينهم، فقال: هلم، فقلت: أين؟ قال: إلى النار والله، قلت: وما شأنهم؟ قال: إنهم ارتدوا بعدك على أ

52

30 Jul 2026, 07:17 UTC399 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

حكم الإمام مالك على منكري السنة النبوية.

👍4

19 Jul 2026, 18:13 UTC643 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

جهد متميز " مكتبة ابن تيمية " جميع فتاوى شيخ الاسلام ابن تيمية في صيغة سؤالٍ وجواب نفع الله به مؤلفه، وجامعه، ومفهرسه، وقارئه، وناشره.. https://ibntaymiyyah.org/

2💯1

19 Jul 2026, 18:09 UTC523 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

مكنز الإمام البخاري فهرس تفاعلي شامل لمؤلفات الإمام محمد بن إسماعيل البخاري وما كُتب عنها من شروح وأبحاث ودراسات https://bukhari.dralhoshan.com/

1

17 Jul 2026, 20:48 UTC578 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

( فايدة ): تكوين مكتبة ألكترونية، هو شبيه جداً، بتكوين مكتبة ورقية مطبوعة.. والعبرة في الاستفادة والفائدة، والحفظ، والفقه، والتعليق، والتلخيص.. فمن يجمع الملفات والمؤلفات الألكترونية، دون قراءتها، أو استعراض خلاصاتها، أو الاستفادة منها،أو نشرها،، هو كمن يجمع الكتب المطبوعة، لتكون ديكوراً في منزله، دون أن يستفيد منها علماً نافعاً.. وكم من مستفيد كثيراً، وهو لا يملك كتباً.. ولو كان التركيز والاقتصار على صحيحي البخ

8❤‍🔥1

11 Jul 2026, 20:26 UTC510 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @mahadasanaad

( أخبار معهد حفظ الأسانيد والمتون ) : تنطلق غداً -بإذن الله- الدفعة الرابعة ( ٤ ) في معهد حفظ الأسانيد والمتون. ويبدؤون غداً في المرحلة الأولى [ ١ ] في "المعهد"، وهي حفظ مايقارب [ ١٢٠٠ ] ألف ومائتا إسناد، روي بها الألوف من أحاديث السنة النبوية. 🌗🌖وقد كان انطلاق الدفعة الأولى قبل أربع سنوات ونصف تقريباً وتحديداً / يوم الأحد ١٣ / ٦ / ١٤٤٣هـ والله تعالى نسأل للجميع التوفيق والإعانة، وتمام الاستفادة والإفادة.

2👍2💯1

7 Jul 2026, 10:58 UTC683 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

( بحث قيم ) عناية المحدثين بالحفظ وعلاقته بالتفوق العلمي، طلاب كلية الحديث أنموذجاً.

2

1 Jul 2026, 04:55 UTC≈1,050 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

( الإسناد مفخرة أمة محمد صلى الله عليه وعلى آله وسلم ) : قال الإمام ابن تيمية رحمه الله: " وعِلْمُ الإسناد والرِّواية مِمَّا خَصَّ الله به أُمَّةَ محمدٍ صلى الله عليه وسلم، وجَعَلَه سُلَّمًا إلى الدِّراية، فأهل الكتاب لا إسنادَ لهم يأثرون به المنقولات، وهكذا المُبتدِعون من هذه الأُمَّة أهل الضلالات، وإنما الإسناد لـمَنْ أعظم الله عليه المنة أهل الإسلام والسُّنة؛ يفرقون به بين الصحيح والسقيم، والمعوج والقويم، وغيره

❤‍🔥32👍1

29 Jun 2026, 21:04 UTC709 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

( فائدة ذهبية ): قال الذهبي رحمه الله: "…وأي خير في حديث مخلوط صحيحه بواهيه، وأنت لا تفليه ولا تبحث عن ناقليه، ولا تدين الله به". [ زغل العلم للذهبي ص ٢٨ ] https://t.me/AbiHuraira

4

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @AbiHuraira. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 45,501 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“وقف أبي هريرة لعلم الحديث ورجاله 🖋📚” (@AbiHuraira), 3,610 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AbiHuraira.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.