Channel
@AbdulbosidWrites
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
11,554subscribers
-137 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001902992205 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AbdulbosidWrites |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 30 November 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AbdulbosidWrites |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:07 | 11,554 | -30 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:13 | 11,584 | -33 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:56 | 11,617 | -19 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 10:13 | 11,636 | -23 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:04 | 11,659 | -13 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:22 | 11,672 | -15 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:51 | 11,687 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:30 | 11,691 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:17 | 11,691 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 19 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (19 June 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 20,087 |
| Reactions total | 456 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 15:27 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
935 reactions across 19 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 935 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 935reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://telegra.ph/25-mountains-later-08-05 I wrote about why people hike, how it changed me, and my recommendations on hiking from my own experience.
💯7
Kecha juda ko’p kishi o’zimdagi kriteriyalar haqida so’rab yozibdi. Fikrimcha 100 ta kriteriya qo’yib, hammasiga to’g’ri kelishing kerak deyish noto’g’ri. Fundamental qadriyatlar to’g’ri kelsa yetarli deb o’ylayman. Bu qadriyatlar esa har kimda har xil. Kerakli insonlar buni bir biri bilan ochiq gaplashib aniqlab olishadi. Hamma muammolarning yechimi — ochiq suhbat.
💯36
Manga savol bermoqchi bo’lsangiz👇 t.me/voprosy?start=cn7oyka
💯5
Tepadagi postni ko'pchilik noto g'ri tushunibdi. Biror amal bilan qaysidir qizni "Bu yomon qiz, bunga uylanib bo'lmaydi", deb aytilmagan. Qiz bola kabluk kiyishi bilan yomon qizga aylanib olmaydi, muammo chuqurroq. Kabluk nima uchun kiyiladi? Mening fikrimcha, boshqalarning e' tiborini tortish uchun. Chunki kabluk qulay emas va oyoqni qisib tashlaydi, qizlarning o'zlari ham bundan jaloba qilishadi. Instagramga …
💯28
Qanday qizga uylanishim kerak? Qayerdan qidirish va nima savollar berish haqidagi maqolalarga qo'shimcha. Uylanishga qiz qidirayotganingda eng muhim narsani yodingda tutishing kerak. Sen bo'lajak farzandlaringga ona qidiryapsan. Ular asosiy vaqtini sen tanlagan qiz(ayol) bilan o'tkazadi. Quyidagi barcha kriteriylar ham shu prinsipga asoslanadi. Aqlli va o'qishni yaxshi ko'radigan. Tushuntirish shart emas deb o'ylay…
💯20
O'zim ko'p yugurish bilan shug'ullansamda, ba'zi yuguradiganlarning ba’zi odatlari yoqmaydi. To'g'ri, yugurish sizni boshqalardan sog'lomroq qiladi, lekin yaxshiroq inson qiladi degani emas. Ba'zi yuguruvchilar yangi boshlaganlarga yordam berish o'rniga ularni kamsitishadi. Kechagi yugurishda ba'zilarni ko'rdim, boshqalarga qarab: "Bu yugurish emas, undan ko'ra yurganing yaxshi" deyishdi. O'sha inson yuguradimi y…
💯47
Endi faqat ertalab velosiped haydashga chiqaman. Birinchi o‘rinda mashina yo‘q, katta yo‘lda bemalol yursa bo‘ladi. Havo ham ancha tozaroq bo‘lar ekan. Undan tashqari Yangi O‘zbekiston yo‘lida boshqa velosipedchilar ham bo‘ladi, ular bilan gaplashib ketish mumkin. Men gaplashib ketolmadim, chunki 60 yoshli otaxonlar ham mendan tezroq edi
💯48
Velosipedda uchishni ham boshlab oldim, o‘ylaganimdan ancha osonroq ekan. Oxirgi 3 kunda 120 km velosipedda uchibman va bugun ham juda uchgim kelyapti. Doim trenirovka qilib bo‘lmaydi, ba’zi kunlarda dam olish kerak, shuning uchun bugun chiqmaslikka qaror qildim. Trenirovkaning eng qiyin qismi dam olish bo‘lsa kerak, chunki o‘zingizni hech narsa qilmagandek his qilasiz. O‘zingizni hech narsa qilmaganlikda ayblash…
💯30
Birinchi suzishni 400-500 metr bilan boshlagan edim sekin asta 2,6kmgacha chiqdim. Hozirgacha umumiy 60km suzibman.
💯40
Doctorlar aytaveridimi. Belim bilan muammo bo’lgan paytda, doctorlar hiking bilan shug’ulanma deb aytishdi. 3 oydan beri hiking qilaman belim ancha yaxshilangandek. Yugurish bilan shug’ullanma deb aytishganda yugurishga chiqdim. Yana yaxshilandim. O’zimdan boshqalarda ham ko’rdim. Grijasi bor odamlarga doctor harakat mumkun emas deb aytadi lekin shug’ullanishni boshlagandan keyin grija davolanib ketayapti. Doct…
💯58
Majbur bo’lsez qilasiz. Tepadagi postda tog’da yo’qolib qolganim haqida yozgan edim. Sheriklarim boshqa yo’ldan man esa boshqa yo’ldan ketgan edim. Bir birimiz qayerdaligimizni bilmaymiz va uni ustiga ratsiya ishlamay qolgan. 2 sumka yukni olib sekin yurishda davom etdim chunki to’xtashga haqqim yo’q hech kim yordam bermaydi. Kechqurun soyni ichiga kirib chiqdim, toshlardan dumalab tushib ketdim va jarliklardan …
💯72
30km hiking qilgandan keyin bir o’zim tog’da telefonsiz, ovqatsiz va yo’lni bilmasdan qolib ketdim. Kechqurun 9da yo’qolib qolgan bo’lsam, ertalab 7da yo’l topib do’stlarimni oldiga yetib bordim. Yurishim kerak bo’lgan masofa o’ylasam hech qachon yetib borolmaydigandek edi. O’ylashni to’xtatib sekin sekin qadamlab bosib, bazida oyog’imni sudrab yetib oldim. Agar to’xtab qolganimda aniq o’lar edim chunki qayerdali…
💯65
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @AbdulbosidWrites. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,141,357 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Abdulbosid Abdullayev” (@AbdulbosidWrites), 11,554 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AbdulbosidWrites.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.