С днём лоботряса
👍37🔥4❤3

Channel
@Abadead
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,948subscribers
-18 since we began measuring on 11 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002113238952 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Abadead |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Abadead |
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Oct 2026, 18:00 | 3,948 | -1 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 18:56 | 3,949 | -13 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 10:57 | 3,962 | +9 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 17:16 | 3,953 | -9 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 20:20 | 3,962 | -4 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 01:22 | 3,966 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 7 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
742 reactions across 17 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 491 | 66.2% | |
| 🗿 | 63 | 8.49% | |
| 👍 | 54 | 7.28% | |
| 🍌 | 25 | 3.37% | |
| 💯 | 21 | 2.83% | |
| 🤔 | 12 | 1.62% | |
| 🫡 | 9 | 1.21% | |
| 🙏 | 8 | 1.08% | |
| 🤬 | 8 | 1.08% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 0.943% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 0.809% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 0.809% | |
| 😱 | 6 | 0.809% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 0.809% | |
| 👎 | 5 | 0.674% | |
| 😭 | 5 | 0.674% | |
| 🌭 | 2 | 0.27% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 0.27% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.135% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.135% | |
| 4 further kinds | 4 | 0.539% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 742 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 7 May 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Abadead. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 May 2026 to 1 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
С днём лоботряса
👍37🔥4❤3
Ютуб ролики теперь считают просмотры, как шортсы. То есть если человек просто увидел ролик или включил первую секунду и вышел это будет +1. Конечно, говно полное нововведение. По факту это некачественные просмотры, которые в стату идут. Вот на скрине 11к просмотров уже, а на деле должно быть около 3-4к по соотношению к лайкам, 37 комментов. Со стороны выглядит как какой-то накрученный видос. Ещё и рекламодатели по-…
❤36🤔4
У тайма снесли канал по той же причине, по которой мне когда-то блокировали ролик За само дбд вероятнее дало бы просто плашку 18+ (тоже случаи были). Поэтому единственная причина удаления, которая приходит на ум - это реклама плеерка. Либо из-за футажей, либо из-за говорящихся слов. Возможно, на сайте есть краденные аккаунты, которые продают или услуги, предоставляемые читерами (по типу накруток) - на что и поругал…
❤23👍2
Провайдер рофлит, хз когда починит стримить с такими просадками невозможно
🍌23🌭2❤1👍1
Глянули лан турик немного Вроде, и прикольно, хорошо играют, только непонятно - в чем смысл? Ворлд кап интересно смотреть было, потому что было больше свободы в балансе, тимы представляли свой регион и ты сам хотел болеть за них. А тут? 5 команд, нулевой призовой (буквально нет), и аудитория 20 человек в зале. И на это потрачено >10.000$. Выглядит так, будто типы сняли себе дом, чтоб буткемп организовать или под пив…
💯21😭5❤3👍1😎1
Че подрубить смотреть лан завтра?
❤31👍6🤔1
Ну жижа в общем ролик Посыл-то хороший и даже есть крупицы чего-то стоящего, но примеры он решил взять самые худшие. Проблема в том, что автор в одну гребёнку всё кидает и называет слопом все, что ему либо не нравится, либо где есть заезженные темы. А потом приводит в пример каналы, которые можно тоже назвать слопом, но просто в другом жанре. Например, в играх. Он игнорирует тот факт, что даже некоторые приведенные…
❤24🤔7🔥2👍1
попало в реки, кажется интересным не хотите сегодня на стриме пообсасываем насколько проклят нынешний ютуб?
❤35👍5😁1
Это прикол короче какой-то с программой контент-креаторов в дбд, в которой обещают рассмотреть тебя в течении 4 недель. С такими задержками я не встречался ни с Почтой России, которые жонглируя твоей посылки в рассортировке случайно теряют её или разбивают Ни с заказов с алика, когда китайский брат торговец отправляет тебе посылку через пешего курьера из своей страны, экономящего на таможенной пошлине и пересекающег…
❤39🥰2😡1
Делаю ролик на основной канал, а так как у меня есть тг, надо провести социальный опрос Че думаете про онлифанс и онлифанщиц?
❤41🫡8👎2👀1
Призы раздаст друк, написав вам в лс @k1ng_r4gnar
🎉 Результаты розыгрыша: 🏆 Победители: 1. Kosiu (@Kosiiu) 2. Кирилл (@Zlar4ik) 3. Кирилл (@Mikte) 4. ShadyOboroten 5. conum (@conumm) 6. Ivan (@Ivan9_90) 7. smokers never die😶🌫️ (@malboro_never_end) 8. КТО-ТО ВАЖНЫЙ (@SADcat_33) 9. ffinka ᖭི༏ᖫྀ (@i_am_clown) 10. ChipChili (@chipchili21) 11. HzDima (@Dalbocracker) 12. Tayf (@Sca3er) 13. REcold (@Recoldik) ✔️Проверить результаты
❤16👏5
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Abadead. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дедовщина” (@Abadead), 3,948 subscribers as measured 10 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Abadead.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.