3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 959–968 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 00:43
967
+7
7 Aug 2026, 16:51
960
no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:47
960
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
64.1%
avg views ÷ 967 subscribers
Avg views / post
620
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held
18 (2 July 2026 – 4 August 2026)
Views total
3,098
Reactions total
53
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 17:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
149 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
61
40.9%
❤
41
27.5%
🎉
25
16.8%
👍
14
9.40%
👏
8
5.37%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 149reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Meet BCC Hub — The Tech Ecosystem Behind Our Grand Prizes! 🎧
Behind every great event are partners who support the dev community. Today, we want to introduce BCC Hub!
Who are they?
BCC Hub is a tech company and subsidiary of Bank CenterCredit, one of Kazakhstan's leading financial institutions. Founded in 2024 as a resident of Astana HUB, they are growing from an internal IT team into a regional center of technolog…
Who makes Agentic Football Cup possible? 🤝⚽️
Behind every great tournament is a strong team of partners. Here are the ones making our championship happen on August 22nd:
School 21 — Our venue and media partner. They are providing a tech-focused space for the event and helping us spread the word.
Startup Choyxona — Our media partner, helping us reach developers and tech enthusiasts across the region.
IT Park — Our…
🇺🇸 From Tashkent to Las Vegas: The path is open!
🚀 Imagine building an AI agent in the morning, qualifying in the afternoon, and taking your project all the way to Las Vegas. Here is exactly how it works:
1️⃣ Join the Workshop & Cup: Compete in the Agentic Football Cup in Tashkent.
2️⃣ Qualify for the Global League: Tashkent winners go straight to the global competition.
3️⃣ Take the Stage in Vegas: Top teams go …
🎁 1st Place Revealed!
🏆AirPods Pro 3 + $100 AWS Credits
Tomorrow, we are finally showing the main thing we’ve been mentioning in all our posts before
🗓 22 August · 11:00–16:00 (Check-in at 10:30)
📍 School 21, Tashkent
🎟 Free · Beginners welcome
👥 Limited slots: Only 32 teams (96 participants total)
👉 Claim your spot: https://www.meetup.com/aws-tashkent/events/315604722/
🎁 What are you competing for?
🎮 The prize pool for the Agentic Football Cup is officially ready! We have solid rewards for multiple places.
🏆 The battle for 1st place is going to be big, and we will officially reveal that specific prize in our next post.
👀 But here is the most exciting part: the ultimate reward of this tournament isn’t even on this list yet. Details will be announced very soon.
🗓 22 August · 11:0…
👆This quick video shows how the game simulation works from the inside and what functions your agent will have on the field.
📺 Watch this 1-minute guide and get ready for the tournament!
🎁 P.S. In the next post, we are going to announce the prizes for the winners. Stay tuned!
🗓 22 August · 11:00–16:00 (Check-in at 10:30)
📍 School 21, Tashkent
🎟 Free · Beginners welcome
👥 Limited slots: Only 32 teams (96 participant…
Here is how we will run the tournament👆
👀 What’s next?
In the next post, we will drop a quick video tutorial showing exactly how to build and configure your AI agents. Spoiler: it’s way simpler than you think.
🗓 22 August · 11:00–16:00 (Check-in at 10:30)
📍 School 21, Tashkent
🎟 Free · Beginners welcome
👥 Limited slots: Only 32 teams (96 participants total)
👉 Claim your spot: https://www.meetup.com/aws-tashkent/ev…
🎤 Our Call for Papers is open!
☁️ AWS Community Day Central Asia is coming to Tashkent at the end of September, with Almaty to follow!
Have an AWS or cloud story, project, or lesson worth sharing? We’re looking for sessions on AWS, AI/ML, serverless, DevOps, security, data, architecture, cost optimization, and more.
First-time speaker? You’re absolutely welcome! Our Technical Committee can help you refine your top…
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @AWSUserGroupTashkent. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 51,839 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AWS User Group Tashkent” (@AWSUserGroupTashkent), 967 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AWSUserGroupTashkent.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.