Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

‌ ‌𝗆𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗇𝗂𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝖼𝗄 ، مـلانـي پـک

@AU69NI

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

2,826subscribers

+30 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002269746143
TypeChannel
Username@AU69NI
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/AU69NI

Growth

2,7962,8982,8476 August 2026 — 2,796 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,804 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,898 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,826 subscribers2,8266 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +30. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,781–2,913 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 16:582,826-72
9 Aug 2026, 20:512,898+94
6 Aug 2026, 22:032,804+8
6 Aug 2026, 16:362,796first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.2%
avg views ÷ 2,826 subscribers
Avg views / post
600
38 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
40
of 40 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 38 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held40 (4 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total22,804
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 38 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @AU69NI. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 40 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 15:21 UTC37 viewsread 7 August 2026

دیدم قمبول مرغ بخورن ولی خایه گوسفند نه😭😭😭

Signed 𝚈𝚄𝚁𝙸

7 Aug 2026, 15:09 UTC42 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ariesxvs

این پیام رو فور کنید+پست مشخص کنید رندوم به ده تا چنل استارز بدم.

7 Aug 2026, 15:08 UTC52 viewsread 7 August 2026

ما گوسفند سر می‌بریم همه جاشو میخوریم:)

7 Aug 2026, 15:07 UTC54 viewsread 7 August 2026

البته کلا اون ناحیه خوب نیست که دخترا بخورن

7 Aug 2026, 15:06 UTC61 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

خایه گوسفند نخوردید جدی؟!

  1. نه84%
  2. خوردم16%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @AU69NI. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Aug 2026, 15:06 UTCAnonymous Poll31 voters

خایه گوسفند نخوردید جدی؟!

  1. نه84%
  2. خوردم16%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 3,128 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

melanie pack
@melllanno · 2
20 posts
‌‌‌ ‌‌‌ ‌‌‌ ‌‌‌ gay kids 、پک اسکیز
@skzpacks · 476
6 posts
‌‌ ‌‌ ‌ ‌‌‌‌chea ' s stud𐔎o
@chae1iu · 34
4 posts
‌ ‌‌ ‌‌‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ lemonade‌ ‌ ‌ ‌‌‌ 𝜗˚‌‌‌℘ྀི ‌‌ ‌ ‌
@Douxea · 6,012
4 posts
‌ ‌ ‌‌ sınner
@hhjx3 · 4,567
4 posts
‌ 𝗆︎𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖻︎𝖾𝗅︎𝗅︎𝖾 پك جني
@jenstarl · 8
4 posts
◟‌‌ 𝗌𝗄𝗓 𝗁𝗎𝖻 ‌◞ Closed🔒.
@skzhuxb · 1,736
4 posts
𝓐urevia
@Aurrevia · 356
3 posts
‌ ‌ ‌foxie’s room 🆕
@ch3eri · 117
3 posts
𝖧𝗎𝗌𝖻𝖺𝗇𝖽
@chenpaxk · 79
3 posts
‌ ‌ ‌ ‌‌𝖢𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾 𝖱𝗈𝗈𝗆 پرونده جنایی
@Cri2meroom · 114
3 posts
rosa ‘s sticks پک استیکر
@cruomn · 396
3 posts
‌ ‌ㅤ ㅤ‌‌ ‌‌ 𝖽𝖺𝗁𝗅ı𝖺 ‌ㅤ ㅤ‌‌ ‌
@dahliaskz · 429
3 posts
ㅤ ‌‌𝒱 anilla
@de3rr · 139
3 posts
angelora
@e1vck · 697
3 posts
‌‌ ‌ ‌‌ ‌‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ vamp’ hold
@enwoil · 449
3 posts
‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ŞG
@girlysllv · 1,342
3 posts
‌ ‌ ‌ cattus ‘s eye
@hear2n · 238
3 posts
New یـونـانِ بـاسـتـانی
@Historgree · 270
3 posts
𝒜urelia
@ItAureliaa · 524
3 posts
‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ane ‘s file
@j9uong · 58
3 posts
NOW OR NEVER./new part
@Maybe_inlife · 144
3 posts
‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ min unique
@megjun · 672
3 posts
‌ ‌‌ ‌ minibell پك مینجی 🖤
@min1zi · 702
3 posts
‌ ‌Candyfloss
@n1xyo · 100
3 posts
♱ 𝖭𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗂𝗌
@nemesisbl · 208
3 posts
‌ ‌ ‌ 𝚴𝗂𝗑𝗀𝗁𝗍 ៹⋆ 𝗉𝖺𝖼𝗄
@Nightxkdrama · 3,115
3 posts
riri woo ’s
@ri1wo · 54
3 posts
ㅤlace ’s site پک جدید
@ros5es · 110
3 posts
𝗅𝖾𝗈𝗐𝗈𝗇'𝗓 :
@Sangwon_Leo · 1,753
3 posts
‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌saki ‘s web
@si1tk · 690
3 posts
‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ minmin ‘s club لیسول
@solfile · 61
3 posts
‌ ‌ ‌ ‌cannibal🆕
@sx1wl · 149
3 posts
‌ ‌ ‌ عـطـرِ کـاغـذِ کـهنـه‌
@Theoldcafee · 171
3 posts
🆕‌ ‌ ‌ ‌𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝗐𝗈𝗅𝖿
@thwulf · 1,135
3 posts
‌ ‌ ‌ ‌jen ’s filter پڪ جنے
@u1nle · 19
3 posts
🍂کؕ‍أخ پرأمؕ‍پتؕ
@VERSAY0 · 346
3 posts
ㅤ akio
@vr3ie · 308
3 posts
‌ ‌ ‌ ‌y𖹭ung winner‌ ‌
@wonypackz · 677
3 posts
ㅤcatharsıs‌
@woufe · 402
3 posts
ㅤ𝗁𝗈𝗍𝗆𝖺𝗇(🔞)𝖲𝗆𝗎𝗍 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝗌 ㅤ‌
@wsxutil · 1,485
3 posts
‌‌‌ ─┈𝐖𝐄 ﹙🖤﹚
@wxest69 · 81
3 posts
‌ ‌‌ jeansology
@youthlooop · 52
3 posts
godu's talk 🤏🏻
@godustalk · 166
2 posts
Cookie
@iznayakoko · 75
2 posts
ᅠᅠмантра جنے
@jendires · 873
2 posts
BLONDIÉ
@lixhalo · 3,530
2 posts
ㅤ‌ㅤ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ 𝃲 𝚪𝖺𝗉𝗎𝗇𝗓ᥱ𝗅 🆕
@rapunzelpk · 267
2 posts
‌ ‌‌‌‌ ‌‌ ‌ ‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌𝖪𝗂𝗆𝗉𝖺𝖻 𝗉𝖺𝖼𝗄ֶָ֢∿
@stiker_world58 · 180
2 posts
ㅤ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ 𝗍𝗁︎𝖾 𝗄︎𝗂𝗅︎𝗅︎𝖺ㅤㅤ
@txtpck · 4,623
2 posts
. see u after class
@afterxclassau · 425
1 post
Astra Fictions
@Astrafiction · 87
1 post
‌ ‌ ‌ ram ‘s ‌file
@c1uru · 803
1 post
hiva's daily!
@caramel_daily · 351
1 post
𝖫𝗈𝗌𝗍 𝗂𝗇 𝖿𝗋𝖺𝗆𝖾 🆕
@cvpuq · 117
1 post
🗯
@Deesolationrow · 999
1 post
ㅤ ㅤ 𝖥𝗅‌𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝖣𝗂𝖺𝗋𝗂‌𝖾‌𝗌 🆕‼️
@Flora_Diaries · 195
1 post
ᅠᅠ‎ian ’s berry پک ایان
@ianfiIe · 166
1 post
‌‌ kokonut m𐔎lk کوکو
@koi1ko · 263
1 post
‌ ‌ ‌ ‌līchu’ filēs
@li1soo · 120
1 post
⁦(⁠눈⁠‸⁠눈⁠)⁩
@LIAMAFTERHARDSEX · 179
1 post
𝘔𝘪𝘢𝘶 𝘥𝘦 𝘞𝘰𝘯 🆕️?
@MeowPck · 72
1 post
ایـرانِ مـن 🖤 | new post
@my_iran1819 · 60
1 post
‌ ‌ ‌ ‌happy virus
@nemoye2 · 23
1 post
‌ ‌ ‌pathetic panic.
@patheticpanic · 43
1 post
‌ ‌ ‌‌ ‌ ‌ꪮ
@PQXNO · 5,043
1 post
‌᪷᪷𝖲𝖺𝗇𝖼𝗍𝗈𝗋ᮁ𝗎𝗆.
@sansanged · 490
1 post
𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖿𝗈x 🆕
@th1fox · 534
1 post
‌ ‌‌ ˖ ׅ𝐸𝗅𝗈𝗎𝗋𝖺 ໋࣪ ‌ ‌س‍لڡ ڪر
@tywxss · 2,966
1 post
𝄞
@uuuhhhhhhhhhz · 104
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 65 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“‌ ‌𝗆𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗇𝗂𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝖼𝗄 ، مـلانـي پـک” (@AU69NI), 2,826 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AU69NI.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.