Channel
@ATRI_Heichan
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
4,800subscribers
-10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001778862819 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ATRI_Heichan |
| Created | 10 April 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ATRI_Heichan |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:55 | 4,800 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:27 | 4,804 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:14 | 4,810 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:46 | 4,810 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 10 April 2023 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (10 April 2023 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 06:29 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 10 April 2023 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#频道互推 #相似推荐 ------------------------------ 📢 源头-机器人开发|源码|网站|定制搭建二开 📢 上海（怡红院）人气榜 📢 贵阳 技师 📢 七夜改文件官方🇨🇳《副频道》 📢 长沙来嫖 📢 沈阳最新资源 📢 AJ文案社🏖头像馆🌈壁纸 📢 迪迦拯救昆明市📸 📢 太子DJ@tzbg22 📢 青鸟论坛 ------------------------------ ☁️ 互推入口：@sooo
Signed SOSO搜搜
分享一下我自用的社工机器人 每个地方都查一下 有机会查出来全的 包括大头 具体开什么的自己看吧 开出来怎么验证 知道qq 跟微信号的 去忘记密码qq会让你验证绑定手机号 微信会让你验证实名信息 支付宝可以验证名字 社工1 社工2 社工3 社工4 社工5 社工6 社工7 社工8 社工9 社工10 社工11 社工12 社工13 社工14
Signed ATRI
支持更新和平美化吗？
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed ATRI
介于本人玩了两年的账号被封禁 内核不在更新 美化下个版本更新，这个版本别人给了我数据但是我没给他钱所以不更新也没多少人玩主要是 切号器依旧正常使用
Signed ATRI
腊鸭了
Signed ATRI
ATRI切号工具，全网首款多功能切号器使用之后你会爱上它， 吊打市场一切泛滥源码圈钱， 功能繁多，你想要的都有 支持腾讯所有游戏，众多游戏陆续适配中，投稿游戏优先添加 没有任何网络验证，可断网运行，怕我偷这你那边二次登录就失效的玩意就断网运行 更新内容： ❗️修复王者荣耀/穿越火线恢复脚本不能启动游戏问题❗️ ❗️添加更多0目录游戏❗️ 下载链接：https://wwov.lanzoum.com/i9n4G327m1qh
Signed ATRI
ATRI和平美化，裸奔无需挂防，不需要端口 全网最稳美化使用后你就会爱上它，多人测试已经稳定奔放，稳定奔放毋庸置疑 和平美化，新赛季横空出市，纯裸奔项目，无需挂防 支持全机型安卓14 掉打市场一切泛滥源码圈钱 你想要的都有，无需挂防 S33赛季经一个星期的测试稳定性毋庸置疑 无拉闸记录 放心食用。 2025.8.30更新 修复不能使用问题 下载链接： ❗https://wwov.lanzoum.com/iGA6M34ynz5a❗
❤1
Signed ATRI
ATRI和平内核，裸奔无需挂防，不需要端口 全网最稳内核体验后你就会爱上它，多人测试已经稳定奔放，稳定奔放毋庸置疑 和平内核，新赛季横空出市，纯裸奔项目，无需挂防， 为拯救市面拉闸项目，完美绕过触摸检测，支持全机型安卓14 掉打市场一切泛滥源码圈钱 脚踩 iOS千元内项目脚踢模拟器功能完全裸奔 绘制丝滑流畅，功能繁多，你想要的都有，无需挂防 S33赛季经一个星期的测试稳定性毋庸置疑 无拉闸记录 放心食用。嘎嘎乱杀，稳定上分。 已经支持和平精英1.32.11最新版本 ⚠️广角未修复⚠️ https://wwov.lanzoum.com/iSEuB2zhe9kd
❤1
Signed ATRI
Channel created
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @ATRI_Heichan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
支持更新和平美化吗？
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 10 April 2023 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ATRI” (@ATRI_Heichan), 4,800 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ATRI_Heichan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.