Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ڪ نقاء اليا๛مين

@ASEELEA

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

9,325subscribers

-24 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001135030820
TypeChannel
Username@ASEELEA
CreatedBetween 1 June 2017 and 31 July 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ASEELEA

Growth

9,3259,3499,3376 August 2026 — 9,349 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,349 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,347 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,337 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,325 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -24. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,321–9,353 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 21:539,325-12
9 Aug 2026, 15:149,337-10
6 Aug 2026, 20:559,347-2
6 Aug 2026, 03:309,349no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:239,349first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
29s
Average length
29s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

203 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
18390.1%
👍157.39%
🔥20.985%
🤩20.985%
🥰10.493%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 203reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2025 to 17 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 May 2026, 17:47 UTC767 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

‏"وَلَيَالٍ عَشْرٍ" ‏"ما من أيامٍ العملُ الصَّالحُ فيها ‏ أحبّ إلى اللهِ من هذه الأيام ‏قالوا : يا رسول الله، ولا الجهادُ في سبيلِ اللهِ ؟ قالَ : ولا الجهادُ في سبيلِ اللهِ ‏إلا رجلٌ خرجَ بنفسِهِ ومالِهِ ثمَّ لم يرجِعْ من ذلكَ بشَيءٍ" ‏رواه البخاري. 🍁

5

21 Apr 2026, 20:43 UTC≈1,170 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

•• ‏نعمة عظيمة أن تكون سهلاً بسيطاً تقتبس سعادة قلبك بأصغر التفاصيل ..

10

15 Apr 2026, 22:33 UTC≈1,240 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ﻻ ﺗﻌﺒﺪﻭﻩ ﻟﻴﻌﻄﻲ ' ﺑﻞ ﺃﻋﺒﺪﻭﻩ ﻟﻴﺮﺿﻰ ' ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺭﺿﻲَ أﺩﻫﺸﻜﻢ ﺑﻌﻄﺎﺋﻪ 💙🌸

4

22 Feb 2026, 20:04 UTC≈1,690 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

اجعل بيننا وبينك يا الله حُبا كبيرًا نستنير به في طريقنا ، و اجعل كُل الطرق التي سَنسلُكها تؤدي إليك وإلىٰ جنتك

6

13 Feb 2026, 19:36 UTC≈1,750 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ليكن قلبك كالزجاج لا يكن قلبك مثل الاسفنج يشرب كل شيء بل اجعله مثل الزجاجة ترى الحقائق من ورائها و لا يدخلها شيء, يأخذ ما ينفعه و يترك ما يضره يأخذ الصالح و يترك الفاسد

5

12 Feb 2026, 10:53 UTC≈1,510 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ثلاثة أمور لا يجب أن تضع لها شروطًا : الصدق فهو ليس مشروط ، ومساعدة الآخرين فلا يشترط أن تكون بمقابل .. والصداقة الحقيقية فهي ليست صفقة .

9

27 Jan 2026, 01:06 UTC≈1,630 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

برأيكم النضج الفكري مرتبط بالعمر ام بالتجارب أم بالتعليم؟

  1. العمر10%
  2. التجارب81%
  3. التعليم9%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3

25 Jan 2026, 21:48 UTC≈1,570 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

‏في الوقت المناسب ستأتيك الأحلام المؤجلة ... لترسم في قلبك فرحاً مختوماً بقوله تعالى : ‏﴿إنّا وجدناه صابراً نعم العبد إنه أوّاب﴾

7

18 Dec 2025, 16:17 UTC≈1,830 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

‏"زيِّنوا ليلة الجمعة 🌹 ‏بالصلاة على النَّبِيِّ ﷺ" "‌ يتنافس⁩ الصّالحون في كثرة الصلاة على ‏النّبي ﷺ ، فكُن منهم." 🌹

6

7 Dec 2025, 23:12 UTC≈1,770 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @anektswerVideo

لأجل هذا النصر ولأجل تاريخ سيحفر في ذاكرتنا ذهب الكثير من الشهداء بالغوا في أفراحكم فقد كان الثمن غالياً🇸🇾✌🏻

🤩2👍1

3 Nov 2025, 21:14 UTC≈2,180 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

‏"لقد أحبَّها الجميع ليس لجمالها البالغ، أو لعُمقها الذي يحوِي عالما كاملاً بداخله، بل بسبب الشّعور الدافئ الذي يشعرون به حيال أنفسهم في حضورها ."

15🔥1🥰1

11 Sept 2025, 23:30 UTC≈2,590 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

•من أراد بنـا شراً سينالـهُ هو ، فإن العطــٰـايا تأتي على النوايـا

11👍6🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ASEELEA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

27 Jan 2026, 01:06 UTCAnonymous Poll144 voters

برأيكم النضج الفكري مرتبط بالعمر ام بالتجارب أم بالتعليم؟

  1. العمر10%
  2. التجارب81%
  3. التعليم9%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

31 Jul 2025, 18:00 UTCAnonymous Poll203 voters

من وجهة نظرك هل الاهتمام الزائد يفسد العلاقات ؟

  1. نعم80%
  2. لا20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2025 to 17 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 316,858 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ڪ نقاء اليا๛مين” (@ASEELEA), 9,325 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ASEELEA.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.