Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Quaritch.

Channel

Quaritch.

@ASAVV1Y

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

17subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002560768751
TypeChannel
Username@ASAVV1Y
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 15 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live23 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 23 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ASAVV1Y

Growth

1719187 August 2026 — 19 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19 subscribers15 August 2026 — 18 subscribers23 August 2026 — 17 subscribers7 August 202623 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 16 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17–19 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
23 Aug 2026, 12:3617-1
15 Aug 2026, 18:5618-1
11 Aug 2026, 16:4519no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:2419first reading

Engagement

4 posts held, back to 15 July 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

168 reactions across 4 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54654287813238096693923.2%
custom 52988090039989933103420.2%
custom 52446213257707127971710.1%
custom 5418335495715323439116.55%
custom 547430444291014209595.36%
custom 534808407715927686784.76%
💔84.76%
custom 523114305267593162563.57%
custom 524487159351505048563.57%
custom 542022343448962713063.57%
custom 541790269186090528142.38%
custom 541792700996573517842.38%
custom 541831307598603933542.38%
custom 542054679398740796142.38%
custom 541794080969565844531.79%
custom 542011081185719024731.79%
custom 524484918667066532621.19%

Custom emoji. 16 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 168reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2025 to 14 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 4 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ASAVV1Y. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 4 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2025 to 14 January 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

14 Jan 2026, 03:29 UTC593 views39 reactions5 Starsread 11 August 2026
Photo

⛔️Моя тень пизже твоего нового.

custom 541833549571532343911custom 54202234344896271306custom 54179026918609052814custom 54179270099657351784custom 54183130759860393354custom 54205467939874079614custom 54179408096956584453custom 54201108118571902473

7 Oct 2025, 06:53 UTC≈1,010 views52 reactions1 Starread 11 August 2026

⚔️я твоя киса, остальные — сучки.

custom 546542878132380966921custom 529880900399899331011custom 53480840771592768678custom 52311430526759316256custom 52446213257707127976

27 Sept 2025, 12:31 UTC885 views43 reactions1 Starread 11 August 2026

Bebeğim, korkma, hadi deneyelim Hadi birlikte kafamız güzelken yerde yuvarlanalım Ne demek. Yani arkadan yok mu. Yani naz yapıyorsun Sakin ol, sakin ol, sakin çıkartma Ben senin aşkınım, ben senin oğlanınım

custom 529880900399899331019💔8custom 54654287813238096695custom 54743044429101420955custom 52446213257707127974custom 52448491866706653262

15 Jul 2025, 20:58 UTC805 views34 reactions1 Starread 11 August 2026
Photo

🌟Onu istiyorum, istersem benim olur.

custom 546542878132380966913custom 52446213257707127977custom 52448715935150504856custom 52988090039989933104custom 54743044429101420954

Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @ASAVV1Y. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 864,998 of 1,626,884entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Quaritch.” (@ASAVV1Y), 17 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ASAVV1Y.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.