Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for KazAPM(Maintenance, Reliability and Integrity)

Channel

KazAPM(Maintenance, Reliability and Integrity)

@APMKazakh

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

579subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002452772013
TypeChannel
Username@APMKazakh
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/APMKazakh

Growth

57910 Aug 2026, 06:01 — 579 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 21:21 — 579 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 06:0110 Aug 2026, 21:21
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 578–580 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 21:21579no change
10 Aug 2026, 06:01579first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
37.6%
avg views ÷ 579 subscribers
Avg views / post
218
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.78%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (29 May 20265 August 2026)
Views total1,524
Reactions total24
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 21s
Average length
41s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

56 reactions across 14 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2341.1%
👍1526.8%
🔥916.1%
💯58.93%
😢47.14%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 56reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
5.00%
1 of 20 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
335
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
332
over 19 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2026 to 5 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 03:31 UTC126 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Многие предприятия до сих пор строят программу инспекций вокруг отдельных аппаратов или трубопроводов. Но мировой подход давно изменился. Сегодня основой управления целостностью становятся коррозионные контуры (Corrosion Loops) и инспекционные контуры (Inspection Circuits). Что такое коррозионный контур? Коррозионный контур - это группа трубопроводов, работающих в одинаковых условиях: - одинаковая среда; - схожие т

👍43

2 Aug 2026, 07:35 UTC178 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Мы сколько угодно можем внедрять передовые практики на предприятии, организовывать тренинги и умничать, используя модную терминологию... но результата не будет, пока дело не дойдёт до дела... Часто происходит так, что всё внедрение надежности, ТОиР происходит в отдельно взятом кабинете... отдельной группой людей... которые вдохновлены на первом этапе... но энтузиазм быстро начинает угасать... до тех пор, пока не при

💯5

31 Jul 2026, 15:19 UTC209 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Для тех, кто спрашивал о сертификации RBI (Risk-Based Inspection). В Казахстане собственной международной сертификации RBI пока нет. Если нужен сертификат, который признается во всем мире, то это API 580 Risk Based Inspection от American Petroleum Institute. Экзамен сдается в авторизованных центрах Pearson VUE, а допуск зависит от образования и опыта работы (либо наличия API 510/570/653). Кстати, знаю, что среди по

2

30 Jul 2026, 12:52 UTC220 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🚀 Первый выпуск Академии MAIRE Jaryq В Атырау состоялся выпуск первого потока Академии MAIRE Jaryq — международной программы подготовки инженеров для нефтегазохимической отрасли Казахстана. 🎓 Обучение успешно завершили 19 студентов Атырауского университета нефти и газа имени Сафи Утебаева. В течение шести месяцев они изучали теорию и знакомились с реализацией проекта строительства полиэтиленового завода Silleno. У

🔥31

24 Jul 2026, 04:45 UTC303 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Помню как то был на онлайн мероприятии посвященному возможности использования ИИ в формировании стратегий обслуживания и один из спикеров осуждающе рассказывал как GPT ему не правильно расписал алгоритм замены подшипника, но это было прям на заре самого GPT, а сейчас? Кто то пробывал уже формировать через него стратегии? Лечиться уже через него запретили, глядишь и планы ТОиР запретят делать...))) PS. Диаграмма про

1

21 Jul 2026, 15:52 UTC311 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Так себе новости. По информации Reuters Каспийский трубопроводный консорциум (КТК) временно прекратил прием казахстанской нефти после серии атак беспилотников на танкеры у морского терминала под Новороссийском. Сейчас проводится оценка последствий и безопасности инфраструктуры. Через КТК проходит около 80% экспорта нефти Казахстана. https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/cpc-has-stopped-accepting-kazakh-oil-due-att

😢4🔥1

12 Jul 2026, 07:47 UTC411 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

⚙️ Еще один интересный отраслевой ивент от PetroCouncil Kazakhstan. 16 сентября 2026 года в Атырау, в рамках форума PetroMaintenance-2026, впервые пройдет чемпионат PetroMechChamp Kazakhstan для специалистов нефтегазовой отрасли. Участники будут соревноваться по трем направлениям: 🔹 сварочно-монтажные работы; 🔹 механическая обработка и подготовка труб; 🔹 обслуживание фланцевых соединений. Подобные мероприятия помо

1

12 Jul 2026, 07:43 UTC286 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Мало спланировать работу, надо еще и оценить риски #KazAPM

1

9 Jul 2026, 05:00 UTC335 viewsread 10 August 2026
AdvertisementFile

📢 Коллеги, для специалистов по ТОиР и надежности оборудования С 3 по 7 августа в Алматы пройдет курс Best Practices in Maintenance and Reliability от BII Research. Программа охватывает ключевые направления управления надежностью: 🔹 Asset Reliability 🔹 RCM (Reliability Centered Maintenance) 🔹 Оптимизация ППР 🔹 Управление работами и запасами 🔹 CMMS-системы 🔹 Инструменты повышения эффективности производства 🔹 Подготов

4 Jul 2026, 06:38 UTC612 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

🚛 Этиленовый фракционатор для проекта Silleno отправился с завода «Атыраунефтемаш» на площадку строительства. Это не просто перевозка крупногабаритного оборудования - это важный этап для будущего полиэтиленового комплекса. Приятно видеть, что такое ответственное оборудование изготавливается в Атырау. Шаг за шагом проект становится реальностью. #KazAPM

10

3 Jul 2026, 05:02 UTC329 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Poll

Работы длительностью менее двух часов можно не планировать.

  1. Правда16%
  2. Ложь84%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @APMKazakh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Jul 2026, 05:02 UTCAnonymous Quiz99 voters

Работы длительностью менее двух часов можно не планировать.

  1. Правда16%
  2. Ложь84%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Jul 2026, 05:00 UTCAnonymous Quiz101 voters

Если оборудование полностью зарезервировано, его нельзя считать критичным.

  1. Правда33%
  2. Ложь67%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Jul 2026, 05:00 UTCAnonymous Quiz98 voters

Для большинства видов оборудования возраст не является основной причиной отказов.

  1. Правда69%
  2. Ложь31%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 483,806 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“KazAPM(Maintenance, Reliability and Integrity)” (@APMKazakh), 579 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/APMKazakh.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.