Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

APCUB

@APCUB

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,555subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001708633604
TypeChannel
Username@APCUB
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/APCUB

Growth

1,5551,5591,5577 August 2026 — 1,559 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,559 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,558 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,556 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,555 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,554–1,560 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 06:051,555-1
10 Aug 2026, 15:311,556-2
7 Aug 2026, 18:181,558-1
7 Aug 2026, 09:161,559no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:041,559first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 15 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 07s
Average length
1m 01s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

515 reactions across 14 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍16632.2%
🔥11121.6%
7815.1%
🤬397.57%
💩254.85%
💯254.85%
😁234.47%
🤯163.11%
🤡112.14%
👏50.971%
🥰50.971%
30.583%
👎20.388%
😱20.388%
🫡20.388%
👾10.194%
🤷‍♂10.194%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 515reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 15 November 2025 to 14 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Jun 2026, 19:26 UTC870 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🚫 Parcăm „pe unde apucăm” În plină intersecție, pe trotuar, dar nu contează. Contează altceva pentru el: contează că e fără respect pentru reguli sau ceilalți participanți la trafic. Încălcarea a fost trimisă la poliție prin platforma Observ.md.

💩216

29 May 2026, 18:57 UTC≈1,090 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @cx_mdPhoto

🅿️ "Мы повесим знак и водители сразу начнут парковаться по правилам". Видимо так думают в претуре Рышкановки, когда сначала вешают знаки, а потом додумывают инфраструктуру. 🚗 Только водителям плевать на эти их таблички. И именно поэтому надо организовывать нормальные, цивилизованные парковочные места, если вы уж решили это делать за счет тротуаров. Хорошо, что уже сняли. #CPG928 📍str. Kiev ⭐️ Проголосуй за наш кан

🤯1653💩2👾1🤬1😱1

26 May 2026, 19:36 UTC≈1,070 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @cx_mdPhoto

🅿️ Опять нельзя. Закономерно. 👍 Какая-то управленческая импотенция у них там. 📍str. Kiev ⭐️ Проголосуй за наш канал если есть премиум. 🚒 Подписаться

😁23🤡112🤬2👍1

23 May 2026, 11:42 UTC≈1,200 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

➡️De ce sunt ocupate toate parcările din centru? #victorchironda #chisinaumoldova #primariachisinau

💯252🤷‍♂1

14 May 2026, 07:03 UTC≈3,100 views40 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔴Am revenit cu un nou raid în fața magazinului Bonus — locul unde, deja de un an, problema trotuarului ocupat rămâne ignorată, iar pietonii sunt nevoiți să ocolească mașinile. 🪓Noi continuăm să acționăm. Urmărește ce s-a întâmplat 🫴 🌐 https://youtu.be/s4S8TbqqU80 ➡️Situația de astăzi nu a fost diferită: trotuarul plin, reacții tensionate din partea unor șoferi, totul cum v-ați deprins. ⚠️Realitatea e simplă: dacă

26👍10🔥2🫡2

12 May 2026, 15:32 UTC≈1,350 views57 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

➕Noul episod deja disponibil pentru Patroni📱 🪓Pentru spectatorii de pe YouTube va fi publicat mai târziu! 📱 Patreon

🔥36👍16🥰41

12 May 2026, 08:11 UTC≈1,200 views45 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🚧 Lucrurile încep să se miște! 📣Pe platforma de achiziții publice a apărut un tender pentru: amenajarea spațiilor verzi la magazinul Bonus 🌳 🅿️Pentru cei care ne urmăresc știu bine — am fost acolo de nenumărate ori și am atras atenția șoferilor că acel loc NU este parcare, ci trotuar destinat pietonilor. 🇲🇩 După multe intervenții și sesizări, în sfârșit vedem un pas concret: urmează lucrări de amenajare, ceea ce î

26👍17👎2

5 May 2026, 15:14 UTC≈1,470 views73 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Las asta aici! 05.05.2026 Tiraspol 5

🔥46👍243

3 Apr 2026, 14:02 UTC≈2,100 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Lumea se întreabă! S-a schimbat cumva regulamentul circulației rutiere sau instructorul are altă menire, de a-i învăța pe viitorii șoferi cum să fii "porcos" în trafic? Pentru orice eventualitate, cazul a fost observat miercuri, 1 aprilie, orele 11:54, pe strada Teilor, dacă poliția sau chiar școala conducătorilor auto vor să se autosesizeze. Și după ne mirăm că avem șoferi bădărani?

🤬362😱1

26 Dec 2025, 15:26 UTC≈2,410 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🙅Salutare, prieteni 💬Această locație este bine cunoscută pentru ambuteiajele care se formează zilnic. Din păcate, unii șoferi aleg să evite coloana folosind trotuarul, ceea ce creează disconfort și riscuri pentru pietoni. ➡️Pornind de la această situație, aș vrea să vă întreb: credeți că organizarea unui raid în această zonă ar fi o soluție eficientă? 🎮Care sunt părerile voastre? 🔼Uzinelor

👍272

7 Dec 2025, 07:56 UTC≈2,270 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @StopBADaraniaPhoto

❗️ Raid împotriva parcării ilegale pe strada M. Viteazul 1 🫰 ▶️Video👉 https://youtu.be/DTFuorTOFnA 🛑StopBAD

👍31🔥31

4 Dec 2025, 10:58 UTC≈2,400 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

👍 În acest episod Alexandru a încercat să le demonstreze haterilor că poziția lor este greșită🫷 ▶️ https://youtu.be/GH719BDz2PU Fiți atenți: video 🔞

🔥21👍13

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @APCUB. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Nov 2025, 23:34 UTCAnonymous Poll342 voters

„Hei, dragilor! 🩷 Astăzi fac un mic sondaj de cunoaștere pentru abonații mei din partea de sud. Scrieți-mi în comentarii de unde sunteți și din ce zonă a sudului proveniți! 🌸” Sau din capitală.

  1. Chișinău77%
  2. Ialoveni3%
  3. Dănceni1%
  4. Suruceni1%
  5. Sociteni1%
  6. Bardar1%
  7. Hîncești2%
  8. Altele14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 15 November 2025 to 14 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 683,322 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“APCUB” (@APCUB), 1,555 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/APCUB.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.