Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Channels linked by matching posts
This channel is in a group of 5 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
64 measurements spanning 97 days, net -1,867. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,501–17,928 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Nov 2026, 09:17
15,781
-28
10 Nov 2026, 10:59
15,809
-17
8 Nov 2026, 20:38
15,826
-19
7 Nov 2026, 11:08
15,845
-13
6 Nov 2026, 11:18
15,858
-9
5 Nov 2026, 13:09
15,867
-14
4 Nov 2026, 10:27
15,881
-15
3 Nov 2026, 12:09
15,896
-7
2 Nov 2026, 10:56
15,903
-1
1 Nov 2026, 14:01
15,904
-23
31 Oct 2026, 11:40
15,927
-8
30 Oct 2026, 10:46
15,935
-11
29 Oct 2026, 11:38
15,946
-13
28 Oct 2026, 08:38
15,959
-13
27 Oct 2026, 08:16
15,972
-6
26 Oct 2026, 09:10
15,978
-3
25 Oct 2026, 07:00
15,981
-7
24 Oct 2026, 06:48
15,988
-19
23 Oct 2026, 07:30
16,007
-11
22 Oct 2026, 08:20
16,018
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 4 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 76 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈851
Videos
≈35
Links
≈1,110
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
28s
Average length
28s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
125 reactions across 18 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 96.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
121
96.8%
🔥
3
2.40%
👍
1
0.8%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 125 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 October 2025 to 31 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔴🔴LIVE දැන්🔴 සියලු සිසුන් පහත link එකෙන් සම්බන්ධ වෙන්න.
SUPER SPECIAL - SPECIAL MEETING LIVE
ව්යවසනයෙන් පසු නැවත අධ්යාපනික මානසිකත්වයට හැරෙමු..
ZOOM link -
https://us06web.zoom.us/j/87634101560?pwd=im7WviEf17nHbJxOpO5bOUyPbG1jNr.1
රෑ 8.00 ට සජීවීව ZOOM + YOUTUBE
❤1
Signed Anuradha Perera
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @AP24T. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
2027 AP PAPER CLASS @APPC2025 · 77,190 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 30 August 2026
2024 MAIN REVISION - AP @APMR24 · 35,405 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 31 August 2026
25 Revision NOTES | AP @ApNotes · 39,811 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 30 August 2026
AP TECHNICAL TEAM @Ap23Tech · 62,428 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 30 August 2026
2024 Revision | ECHEM @echem24GR · 34,642 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 31 August 2026
2025 THEORY - PHYSICS අනුරාධ පෙරේරා @AP25T · 21,835 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 19 September 2026
Notes by Has ☾ @notesbyHas · 22,003 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 21 September 2026
𝐒𝐋 𝐄𝐃𝐔𝐂𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐀/𝐋 @SL_EDUCATION_A_L · 62,717 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 30 August 2026
2023 Revision | echem @echem23MR · 20,224 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 September 2026
Science Link @Sci_Link · 76,019 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 8 September 2026
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 16 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“2024A/L Physics -Anuradha Perera (ජීවිතයට Physics)” (@AP24T), 15,781 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AP24T.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.