Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🪽 | ` , 𝗔𝗡𝗚𝗘𝗟𝗜𝘟 ' 𝘟𝘟𝘟

Channel

🪽 | ` , 𝗔𝗡𝗚𝗘𝗟𝗜𝘟 ' 𝘟𝘟𝘟

@ANGELIX1XXX

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

112subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001739796930
TypeChannel
Username@ANGELIX1XXX
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ANGELIX1XXX

Growth

112115113.57 August 2026 — 115 subscribers9 August 2026 — 115 subscribers16 August 2026 — 112 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 112–115 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 07:23112-3
9 Aug 2026, 05:46115no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:04115first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 30 December 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 00s
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

9 reactions across 3 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🆒222.2%
👀222.2%
🕊222.2%
🌚111.1%
👻111.1%
🤷111.1%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 30 December 2024 to 3 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Oct 2025, 22:37 UTC708 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

300 ###

👀1👻1🕊1🆒1

Signed nᴇᴋᴏ ¿?? #infp ... - ʷᵗᶠ

18 Aug 2025, 12:48 UTC≈1,170 viewsread 9 August 2026

я - @nexvk01 тоже разрываю все свои союзы мне всегда нравилась эта деятельность, но в одиночку я её не потяну. за три года в этой сфере я многое попробовал, но, к сожалению, в этот раз мы мало кому полюбились, мало кому запомнились, а некоторые и вовсе не следили за нами, увы. прошу прощения, что всё привело к такому… печальному концу. закрытия у нас уже случались, и, вероятно, это не последний раз, поскольку кажды

Signed nᴇᴋᴏ ¿?? #infp ... - ʷᵗᶠ

18 Aug 2025, 12:19 UTC872 viewsread 9 August 2026

здравствуйте. я к вам с печальной новостью , я - @clclkic разрываю все союзы. со всеми был рад сотрудничеству!! но так вышло, всем спасибо большое. возможно еще встретимся))

Signed r

13 May 2025, 13:01 UTC≈1,060 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️❎🅰️🅰️🅰️ 🤍 RULES F0R MEMBERS . . . ----angel. ### # BO.OST AN.D PATENT 🤍🤍🤍 . how to get into the chat?!!! 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 ADMIN1STRATI0N

🌚1👀1🕊1🆒1

Signed nᴇᴋᴏ ¿?? #isfp ... - ʷᵗᶠ

13 May 2025, 08:58 UTC774 viewsread 9 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed nᴇᴋᴏ ¿?? #isfp ... - ʷᵗᶠ

13 May 2025, 08:58 UTC592 viewsread 9 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed nᴇᴋᴏ ¿?? #isfp ... - ʷᵗᶠ

13 May 2025, 08:58 UTC641 viewsread 9 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed nᴇᴋᴏ ¿?? #isfp ... - ʷᵗᶠ

1 Jan 2025, 22:27 UTC617 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

милята какие все

🤷1

Signed ɴᴇᴋᴏ ’/’ #isfp ˢᵗᵃʳ

1 Jan 2025, 22:27 UTC626 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @GERHAMZ

С новым годом, заи союзники и те кто в чате есть. Желаю вам счастья, успеха, пусть всё всегда у вас будет хорошо и никогда не будете грустить ни о чееем. Вы большие умницы, я в вас всех верю, пусть трудности никогда не будут вас колебаться и вы всё-всё достигните, все ваши планы образуются. Счастья вам, удачи, хорошего настроения, чтобы всё всегда у вас было хорошо. 🫂🫂 #герхамскиерп !!

Signed ɴᴇᴋᴏ ’/’ #isfp ˢᵗᵃʳ

1 Jan 2025, 22:26 UTC580 viewsread 9 August 2026

как милоо 😘😘😘

Signed ɴᴇᴋᴏ ’/’ #isfp ˢᵗᵃʳ

1 Jan 2025, 22:26 UTC573 viewsread 9 August 2026
File

Союзники, участники и просто люди которые сидят в инфо канале, С наступающим вас,желаем всего самого наилучшего!! Чтоб ◻️◻️◻️◻️ залечил все ваши раны и был самым лучшим годом для вас. Так же хочу поздравить моих любимых союзников, надеюсь они не закончат вести свою конференцию @illicitfam , @westernsk , @DBMANSKIE , @Reveriedeathkf , @cornflows , @FEVERRDREAMM , @REDSTARkf , @scr3ws , @laurensk1e Мне очень нравится

Signed ɴᴇᴋᴏ ’/’ #isfp ˢᵗᵃʳ

1 Jan 2025, 22:25 UTC296 viewsread 9 August 2026

Перезалив поста. Мы берём выходные на несколько дней.Рп и всё остальное буду выкладывать. Так же все посты перезалью, но не сегодня. Всех люблю, муааа.

Signed ɴᴇᴋᴏ ’/’ #isfp ˢᵗᵃʳ

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ANGELIX1XXX. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🪽 | ` , 𝗔𝗡𝗚𝗘𝗟𝗜𝘟 ' 𝘟𝘟𝘟” (@ANGELIX1XXX), 112 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ANGELIX1XXX.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.