Channel
@ANASTASIIASTUDITSKAIA
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
8subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004356808928 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ANASTASIIASTUDITSKAIA |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 13 June 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 5 times, most recently 11 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ANASTASIIASTUDITSKAIA |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 2 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:54 | 8 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:32 | 9 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:00 | 9 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 13 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
11 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7 | 63.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 18.2% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 9.09% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 9.09% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 27 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Мой дебют в кино случился… совершенно случайно 😄 Дочь уже давно бегает по съёмкам в массовке, и тут предложили формат «ребёнок + родитель». Я подумала: ну а почему бы и нет, всё равно день свободен. И вот тут я прочувствовала всю «гламурную» жизнь актёра 😂 Когда тобой командуют — это отдельный стресс (особенно если ты давно сам себе режиссёр по жизни). А ещё эти сцены: пройтись туда-сюда. И ещё раз. И ещё. И ещё… …
❤5
Video, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
Любимые мои бьюти посылки. То, что у нас не купить.😍
Мир изменился - погода меняется. Раньше эти гортензии у нас не перезимовывали так шикарно и уж тем более не цвели так обильно. Картинка красивая, но не знаю к чему приведут такие перемены. Чего нам еще ждать от матушки природы.
❤1💯1
Мои три профессиональных канала не вмещают одну важную часть моей жизни — декоративную косметику. Если честно, у меня её много. Очень много. И при этом я не визажист и никогда им не была. Всё началось неожиданно: был период, когда я сильно заболела и почти две недели жила в режиме «лежать, спать и смотреть в потолок». Единственное, на что хватало сил — YouTube. И именно там я случайно попала в мир визажа. До этого мо…
❤1
🥹
Открытая репетиция БМЦ
Video, posted without a caption
❤🔥2🔥1
Девочки, я уверена, что сейчас здесь в основном именно вы. И у нас с вами похожие мечты. Мы любим сцену. Мы любим быть видимыми. Любим быть красивыми, яркими, замеченными. И давайте честно — у многих из нас внутри живёт желание: петь как Whitney Houston, танцевать как Jennifer Lopez. С пением у меня не особо складывается. Хотя не скажу, что у меня нет голоса. С танцами чуть легче… но с учётом возраста и того, что …
Недавно мне попалась статья, где многодетная мама сказала фразу, которая меня зацепила: она — «продюсер своих детей». И вот это «продюсер» прямо развернуло для меня многое. Потому что правда — мы не знаем, какие знания пригодятся нашим детям, какие навыки «выстрелят», кем они станут и какую роль займут в жизни. И тогда вопрос уже не в том, чтобы ребёнок учился на одни пятёрки и был окружён бесконечными репетиторами. …
Я работаю и на себя и беру проекты на проектирование и реализацию в московских компаниях. Я не постоянный работник в найма. Я, как и многие мечтаю работать меньше, получать больше и уметь делегировать создав хорошую команду. Как только я чувствую скачек в своем профессиональном росте, я перечитываю эту книгу.
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @ANASTASIIASTUDITSKAIA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ANASTASIIA STUDITSKAIA” (@ANASTASIIASTUDITSKAIA), 8 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ANASTASIIASTUDITSKAIA.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.