3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,184–2,186 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 06:05
2,186
+2
7 Aug 2026, 14:47
2,184
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:35
2,184
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 9 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
151 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
65
43.0%
🔥
44
29.1%
👍
25
16.6%
❤🔥
15
9.93%
👀
1
0.662%
💩
1
0.662%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 151reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2025 to 24 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📘 В свежем номере журнала «Клиническая микробиология и антимикробная химиотерапия» читайте:
📌Распространенность инфекций в ОРИТ: результаты исследования РИОРИТа-II
📌Cеротипы S. pneumoniae при инвазивной пневмококковой инфекции в России
📌Терапия инвазивного аспергиллеза у реципиентов трансплантатов почки
📌Острая печеночная недостаточность
📌Микробиота конъюнктивы детей до 1 года
📌Правила выбора оптимального пробиотика
…
Если вы выбрали ответ «да», то возникают ли трудности с выбором эффективной терапии?
Да, выбор эффективной терапии всегда проблема18%
Да, приходится применять комбинации препаратов33%
Нет, стандартная комбинированная терапия чаще всего эффективна24%
Нет, даже в монотерапии чаще всего достигаем хорошего эффекта29%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
📌 Несмотря на широкое применение цефазолина, его эффективность при терапии бактериемии, вызванной метициллин-чувствительным Staphylococcus aureus, до сих пор не изучалась в рандомизированных КИ
📌 Цель исследования — сравнить эффективность и безопасность цефазолина и клоксациллина у пациентов с бактериемией, вызванной MSSA
📌 Открытое non-inferiority (граница 12%) РКИ в 21 клинике Франции у взрослых (≥18 лет) пациентов…
➖ Государственный реестр лекарственных средств (ГРЛС) Но на текущий момент, как сказали мне наши ординаторы – минус вайб! И я с ними полностью согласен! Почему? Если опустить тот момент, что он довольно часто периодически подлагивет.
Потому что постепенно там всё меньше и меньше инструкций и больше листков вкладышей (для пациентов).
⁉️А зачем - возникает резонный вопрос. В 2015 РФ вступила в ЕАЭС и согласно новому р…
Научно-образовательный институт ММЦ приглашает вас принять участие в научно-практической конференции, посвященной актуальным вопросам пульмонологии в условиях многопрофильного стационара.
https://university.groupmmc.ru/conferences/voprosy-pulmonologii-v-mnogoprofilnom-statsionare/
Планируется он-лайн трансляция, регистрация по ссылке ☝️
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @AMT_AMR. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Если вы выбрали ответ «да», то возникают ли трудности с выбором эффективной терапии?
Да, выбор эффективной терапии всегда проблема18%
Да, приходится применять комбинации препаратов33%
Нет, стандартная комбинированная терапия чаще всего эффективна24%
Нет, даже в монотерапии чаще всего достигаем хорошего эффекта29%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Часто ли в своей практике вы сталкиваетесь с тяжелой стафилококковой инфекцией, обусловленной MSSA (метициллин-чувствительным S. aureus)?
Да30%
Нет70%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2025 to 24 October 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Антимикробная терапия” (@AMT_AMR), 2,186 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AMT_AMR.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
